warbz's visuals
Lord Atlantis
17 Jan 2007
IMO the transition between the different user bars is pretty choppy. Would it be possible to smothen out the transitions?
-Lord_Atlantis
-Lord_Atlantis
Warbz
17 Jan 2007
i made this one for me.
90!! different frames. 1 and 1/2 hrs!!
thats as smooth as i can make it without spending ridiculous amounts of time on it,
Sic
18 Jan 2007
Don't use the dissolve blending mode for text, it sucks. Other than that, good.
Whitey
18 Jan 2007
I like the dissolved blended text.
It's a nice signature, I've seen that picture before though.
It's a nice signature, I've seen that picture before though.
E.V.E.
18 Jan 2007
It´s okay, I dont just like the Type of Tank...
7 / 10
oh, and btw. 90 Images is quite alot!
- E.V.E.
7 / 10
oh, and btw. 90 Images is quite alot!
- E.V.E.
Nexolate
18 Jan 2007
It's not just the images; your fonts, backgrounds and borders also look highly pixelated.
Edited by No-Skillz, 18 January 2007 - 21:03.
Edited by No-Skillz, 18 January 2007 - 21:03.
Alias
18 Jan 2007
No-Skillz, on 19 Jan 2007, 08:03, said:
It's not just the images; your fonts, backgrounds and borders also look highly pixelated.
Because he saves it as low-quality Jpeg. He needs to save it high quality.
Slightly Wonky Robob
18 Jan 2007
no jpg or png are the most common, if you save as jpg, then make sure you turn the quality up
Lord Atlantis
31 Jan 2007
The third one seems... more subtle than the others. Almost like it is missing something. An experiment perhaps?
-Lord_Atlantis
-Lord_Atlantis
Sic
31 Jan 2007
Aside from the BG being bland in the third one, it looks good.
EDIT : First sig is the best.
Edited by Sic, 31 January 2007 - 14:41.
EDIT : First sig is the best.
Edited by Sic, 31 January 2007 - 14:41.
Sgt. Nuker
31 Jan 2007
I do agree that the third sig seems to be lacking a certain something. Other than that, the other two sigs look and feel like they have a higher quality.
My best,
Nuker
My best,
Nuker
