Fallout Studios Forums

Here is the missile system that brought Russia to the war.
See you soon

What role does it play in-game? Artillery? Superweapon?

This is air shield system

Hey, THAAD! Awesome, glad to see it gets a day in the sun, and looking lovely at that. What types of aerial targets can it engage - I'm assuming aircraft and ballistic missiles? And if so to the latter, can it defend against a Topol?
My only problem would remain the same from the Beam Truck weapon, but we've already gone over that one.
Edited by CommanderJB, 21 February 2009 - 13:37.

Yes your windows problem
No this system can't stop Topol or iskander but will be very effective against other ballistic missiles.
Also it will be and anti aircraft

Excelent model and skin ... although i think the launcher needs a few more details on. It is way to simple and look rather boring. But overall a good update.
Edited by Anubis, 21 February 2009 - 15:45.

Is brilliant, it is the equivalent to the S-300?

Thats certainly a very nice unit!

I modeled this baby a long time ago for some other thing that I don't remember. Always wanted to see the THAAD ingame.

Great work, but it really is a bit symmetrical.

-Rorschach

It has style.

awesome unit dude. does it do one missle at a time then reload?

sweet.. looks cool.. did you design it?

Rorschach, on 22 Feb 2009, 16:02, said:

Naughty Boidy!

On topic: great work as always, Alexei. I look forward to more.
Edited by Alias, 22 February 2009 - 05:10.

Pretty cool. Although the texture is a little bit bland. But it is nice to see the THAAD in a game. =)

It is mostly anti missile system. But it will be good against aircrafts too.

Throw that in another topic man. It deserves it. Awesome.

And I agree that on the missile launcher of the above unit, it needs some more details.

Like this:



If you'd make the launcher like that it would really look better.
Edited by Aftershock, 22 February 2009 - 13:04.

I can add more details to the missile pod elevator but to chassis I think I don't need

it's for the US, right?

Yep...probably. The way Alex said it in the first topic would usually mean that it was the system that Russia utilized to enter the war...


...instead of the system that forced Russia to go to war due to its existence threatening the Russian blablablas.


Might be wrong though.

I think everyone who knows about the USA missile shield plans understood me

Alexei_Stukov, on 22 Feb 2009, 15:14, said:

It's not the elevator that needs more details. It's the missile launcher system itself. It has absolutly no texture detail on it except for the color. I think adding something else would make it alot less boring ... .

Boring? No texture detail????
How are you with the eyes
I think for game like generals is good if you don't like it, I can't help you my friend. Or if you wish you can make better one

What they mean is, the missile launcher, uses a texture that have not details. Not the chassis, just the weapons module.

My eyes work verry well tks for the question. But you must also try to learn to accept critissism from time to time ( don't take it personaly but you really don't enjoy it when someone says that something can be improved about your models ). I simply said that the launcher has a big lack of details, because except for the shape lines there is absolutly no other detail. Like me others said the same things. If you like it the way it is right now say it like that, but do not deny something that is rather obvios. As i said the model and texture is verry good, the launcher simply has no detail on it ( launcher = just the missile pods not the whole model ). If you don't like critissism at all ( because this is not the first time you behave like this when someone says something about your work ) just say it and we won't ( at least i will not ) say anything critiq again.