←  Warfare Technology

Fallout Studios Forums

»

About Cutting Edge War Machines

This topic is locked

CommanderJB's Photo CommanderJB 26 Jun 2009

If you can't be bothered to read the responses even in your own thread then I wouldn't bother coming on the forums at all. But because I'm feeling friendly I'll restate my argument in simple terms in the hope it will penetrate.
We do not have nanotechnology available for military application at the moment. By the time we do, none of those vehicles or weapons will be in existence, because they will be decades at the minimum out of date. The one exception to this is the 'hovertank' because they don't exist, but I doubt you'll ever see a conventional fictional hovertank either nanotech or no because they're impossible or impractical to make and will remain so for the foreseeable future.
Quote

Rayburn's Photo Rayburn 26 Jun 2009

^ I think he's still suffering from the illusion that Hollywood nanotech = real life nanotech.
He'd probably like to pretend that F-22s carry nano-payload Sidewinders which engulf the target
plane in a grey blob and transform it into a fridge filled with meatloaf made of pilot or something.
Edited by Rayburn, 26 June 2009 - 05:52.
Quote

tank50us's Photo tank50us 26 Jun 2009

or he thinks that nano machines replenish the missiles in Ace Combat, but last I checked, it's a GAME which means it is NOT real. yes it would be interesting to see those vehicles equipped with it, but that can just sit in the part of you mind labeled "Not gonna happen in my lifetime" None of us will be around when that technology becomes available, and when it does, the aircraft/tanks/weapons equipped will easily kick the snot out of anything today. Period. Finished. END OF STORY. Now, please, leave us in peace.
Quote

Rich19's Photo Rich19 26 Jun 2009

Hey Everyone What Would Happen If You Upgraded The F-22 Raptor, RAH-66 Comanche, F-35 Lightning II, Stryker, Hovertank, RQ-4 Global Hawk, V-22 Osprey, Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS, SR-X Aurora, RQ-1 Predator, etc With METAL? Or Maybe Try Upgrading The F-22 Raptor, RAH-66 Comanche, F-35 Lightning II, Stryker, Hovertank, RQ-4 Global Hawk, V-22 Osprey, Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS, SR-X Aurora, RQ-1 Predator, etc With COMPUTERS. What About Upgrading The F-22 Raptor, RAH-66 Comanche, F-35 Lightning II, Stryker, Hovertank, RQ-4 Global Hawk, V-22 Osprey, Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS, SR-X Aurora, RQ-1 Predator, etc With WEAPONS?

Honestly, your question is the same. If you're just going to keep repeating the same bloody list of things like a broken record instead of actually engaging with people and responding to what they say, kindly bugger off and do your trolling on another forum.
Edited by Rich19, 26 June 2009 - 09:59.
Quote

tank50us's Photo tank50us 26 Jun 2009

before any us get so pissed that we lock this guys coords for a Kenetic Strike, or start saying things that can get us banned, someone close this thread, PLEASE.
Quote

Warbz's Photo Warbz 26 Jun 2009

View PostCommanderJB, on 24 Jun 2009, 10:15, said:

View PostDauth, on 24 Jun 2009, 17:30, said:

View PostRayburn, on 24 Jun 2009, 8:00, said:

Why are you posting the same enumeration of military vehicles for the third time, buddy? (twice here, once on SWR)
CmdrJB put it best: By the time nanotechnology will have any serious impact, all the Raptors, Lightnings and Strykers will be museum pieces.


Maybe did a tl:dr on JB?

Though JB is right in this case. Also more bot like behaviour will see me treat you like a bot.
While I wouldn't blame him if that was right, Dauth, I rather suspect that he found the list somewhere and is using it because he thinks it makes him look like he knows a lot about military technology.


It doesn't look like he knows a lot about anything. Especially communication.
Quote

Dauth's Photo Dauth 26 Jun 2009

I'm not going to lock it, if you want to ignore this guy then you can. Just discuss the topic at hand.
Quote

Masonicon's Photo Masonicon 27 Jun 2009

What Happen if Those Fighting Machines like F-22 Raptor, RAH-66 Comanche, F-35 Lightning II, Stryker, M1A2 Abrams, RQ-4 Global Hawk, V-22 Osprey, Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS, SR-X Aurora, RQ-1 Predator, B-2 Spirit, etc goes online with Crew's Nanosuit?
Quote

Zeke's Photo Zeke 27 Jun 2009

I like where this thread is going / Sarcasm
Quote

Rayburn's Photo Rayburn 27 Jun 2009

View PostMasonicon, on 27 Jun 2009, 11:09, said:

What Happen if Those Fighting Machines like F-22 Raptor, RAH-66 Comanche, F-35 Lightning II, Stryker, M1A2 Abrams, RQ-4 Global Hawk, V-22 Osprey, Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS, SR-X Aurora, RQ-1 Predator, B-2 Spirit, etc goes online with Crew's Nanosuit?


They'll wonder why they have to use the same vehicles as their grandfathers.
Edited by Rayburn, 27 June 2009 - 10:15.
Quote

Camille's Photo Camille 27 Jun 2009

that is some disturbingly funny shit right there :D

is this guy for real? like, ain't he a bot?
Quote

Rich19's Photo Rich19 27 Jun 2009

View PostMasonicon, on 27 Jun 2009, 10:09, said:

What Happen if Those Fighting Machines like F-22 Raptor, RAH-66 Comanche, F-35 Lightning II, Stryker, M1A2 Abrams, RQ-4 Global Hawk, V-22 Osprey, Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS, SR-X Aurora, RQ-1 Predator, B-2 Spirit, etc goes online with Crew's Nanosuit?


The crew will realise they are in the FICTIONAL game Crysis and go nuts as a result.

Spoiler
Quote

CommanderJB's Photo CommanderJB 27 Jun 2009

Enough of this. Masonicon, you are spamming and bordering on trolling. If you post about these machines again there will be consequences.
Quote
This topic is locked