Jump to content


Minecraft Server


54 replies to this topic

Poll: To server or not to server? (20 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you play on a FS MC server?

  1. Yes (17 votes [85.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 85.00%

  2. Nope (3 votes [15.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 TheDR

    Whispery Wizard

  • Administrator
  • 5845 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 11:22

Me and Wiz have been wondering if it would be worth getting a FS Minecraft server.

Do the poll and then post in here if you are interested.
Posted Image
F O R T H E N S
Posted Image

#2 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 11:26

I'm still quite new to Minecraft, but I think this could be a laugh |8

The alternative to renting is that we use my comp, but that could be far more complicated than I am prepared to bothered with tbh.

#3 Slye_Fox

    FOXTec Leader

  • Project Leader
  • 2351 posts
  • Projects: CnC: Condition Red, Sigma Invasion, Armoured Sky: Ethereal Dawn

Posted 20 April 2011 - 11:31

Da.
Posted Image

#4 Sgt. Rho

    Kerbal Rocket Scientist

  • Project Leader
  • 6870 posts
  • Projects: Scaring Jebediah.

Posted 20 April 2011 - 11:34

Sí Señor |8

#5 CJ

    Rocket soldier

  • Member Test
  • 2150 posts
  • Projects: Nothing yet

Posted 20 April 2011 - 12:28

A small server would be fun indeed, I finally got me the game so I can join BTW |8

View PostChyros, on 11 November 2013 - 18:21, said:

I bet I could program an internet


#6 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 13:00

Who votes "Nope" and doesn't post?

#7 CJ

    Rocket soldier

  • Member Test
  • 2150 posts
  • Projects: Nothing yet

Posted 20 April 2011 - 13:21

Someone who doesn't even have the game, I presume.
There should be an option for don't own the game btw D:

View PostChyros, on 11 November 2013 - 18:21, said:

I bet I could program an internet


#8 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 13:22

View PostCJ, on 20 Apr 2011, 14:21, said:

Someone who doesn't even have the game, I presume.
There should be an option for don't own the game btw D:

Not everyone on the forum has to post or vote in this topic. If they don't own the game they don't get involved.

#9 Libains

    Light up life.

  • Gold Member
  • 4950 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 13:54

I haven't got the game, nor am I even slightly interested in doing so, however, I don't doubt that a server could be handy if we have enough players.
For there can be no death without life.

#10 Alias

    Member Title Goes Here

  • Member
  • 11705 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 14:19

I think the main opposition to this would be efficiency rather than anything else. Like most games of its kind Minecraft requires a lot less bandwidth/throughput than other games so it is quite likely to be more cost-effective to just have someone with decent internet host a server considering how small this community is.

Posted Image

#11 Dutchygamer

    Shyborg Commander

  • Member Test
  • 1899 posts
  • Projects: Frontline Chaos creator and leader, Invasion Confirmed co-leader

Posted 20 April 2011 - 17:25

I would say yes if I already didn't have a server which a friend hosts |8
Posted Image

#12 Vision#

    Visitor

  • Member
  • 27 posts

Posted 20 April 2011 - 19:24

Agreed, minecraft server would be nice. If the connection would be any way bareable would be playing there.
Posted Image
Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent.
Personified in this case by an 'orrible cunt... me.

#13 Hobbesy

    Discount White Person

  • Gold Member
  • 3752 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 00:25

I'll sprite us up some skins if we get one.

#14 Amdrial

    Naval Wrenchineer

  • Project Leader
  • 3047 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 13:12

I definitely would like an FS Minecraft server!
Posted Image
The above signature was made by TheDR.
Posted Image

#15 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 22:06

13 potential players. That sounds like a reason to invest in a server. I think that given timezones, a 10 player server seems about right methinks. Further comments welcome, but when I get the time I'll look into this for us |8

#16 Slye_Fox

    FOXTec Leader

  • Project Leader
  • 2351 posts
  • Projects: CnC: Condition Red, Sigma Invasion, Armoured Sky: Ethereal Dawn

Posted 24 April 2011 - 22:20

Err... Minecraft servers don't have slots.
They use ram or memory (from some quick research) as the basis of the monthly cost.
Posted Image

#17 Sgt. Rho

    Kerbal Rocket Scientist

  • Project Leader
  • 6870 posts
  • Projects: Scaring Jebediah.

Posted 24 April 2011 - 22:28

Also there's the option to use a Hamachi-based server. But that would take a powerful PC.

#18 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 22:31

View PostSlye_Fox, on 24 Apr 2011, 23:20, said:

Err... Minecraft servers don't have slots.
They use ram or memory (from some quick research) as the basis of the monthly cost.

The ones I've seen do.... |8

View PostSgt. Rho, on 24 Apr 2011, 23:28, said:

Also there's the option to use a Hamachi-based server. But that would take a powerful PC.

How powerful are we talking?

Would an i7 965 with 12gb do you?

#19 Sgt. Rho

    Kerbal Rocket Scientist

  • Project Leader
  • 6870 posts
  • Projects: Scaring Jebediah.

Posted 24 April 2011 - 22:38

Well, my PC does for 4 players (including myself), and it's 2 GB ram and 2.61ghz. So I think it might just do.

#20 Slye_Fox

    FOXTec Leader

  • Project Leader
  • 2351 posts
  • Projects: CnC: Condition Red, Sigma Invasion, Armoured Sky: Ethereal Dawn

Posted 25 April 2011 - 00:46

View PostWizard, on 24 Apr 2011, 23:31, said:

View PostSlye_Fox, on 24 Apr 2011, 23:20, said:

Err... Minecraft servers don't have slots.
They use ram or memory (from some quick research) as the basis of the monthly cost.

The ones I've seen do.... |8


I only did a quick search.

I suggest getting 15-20 players then for 2 reason;
1. Those rare occupations when all regulars will be online at the same time.
2. Random Joiners (it does happen).
Posted Image

#21 TheDR

    Whispery Wizard

  • Administrator
  • 5845 posts

Posted 25 April 2011 - 09:34

View PostSlye_Fox, on 25 Apr 2011, 1:46, said:

2. Random Joiners (it does happen).

From my experience it would be better to keep the server locked out to FS members only (or people who have requested to join and we can trust) so we can avoid getting griefers.
Posted Image
F O R T H E N S
Posted Image

#22 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 25 April 2011 - 11:17

I'll keep it to 10 for the time being, primarily due to cost. If it becomes worth increasing the player capacity we can do that later. Not sure when I am going to be able to get this ready though. Things are pretty busy. Doc, if you get time, would you take a look around for me? Or anyone else for that matter.

#23 TheDR

    Whispery Wizard

  • Administrator
  • 5845 posts

Posted 25 April 2011 - 11:21

View PostWizard, on 25 Apr 2011, 12:17, said:

I'll keep it to 10 for the time being, primarily due to cost. If it becomes worth increasing the player capacity we can do that later. Not sure when I am going to be able to get this ready though. Things are pretty busy. Doc, if you get time, would you take a look around for me? Or anyone else for that matter.

Sure. Hobbesy had a few server ideas, I will talk to him when he gets on and have a look around myself.
Posted Image
F O R T H E N S
Posted Image

#24 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 25 April 2011 - 11:30

Cheers |8

#25 Wizard

    [...beep...]

  • Administrator
  • 9627 posts

Posted 27 April 2011 - 10:56

For those of you who wish to have some further input into our potential MC server, would you be able to join me in the IRC tonight at approximately 2100-2200 (BMT)? Or between now and about 1700 if you can't make that.



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users