warbz's visuals
Warbz 31 Jan 2007
with the first sig i was having trouble cutting the image out of the original picture and so i think it looks blocky at the edges.
with the third one i was trying to get an eery feel to it.
thx for comments i will try to add another element to the third one if i can think of something relevant to add to it.
with the third one i was trying to get an eery feel to it.
thx for comments i will try to add another element to the third one if i can think of something relevant to add to it.
Sgt. Nuker 03 Mar 2007
It's not bad, but IMHO, it could use a bit more work.
For starters, I think it would be really cool if the text could have a ghost image of the NOD logo behind it (in the negative space between the lines).
Secondly, and lastly, the NOD logo being blackened out on the right hand corner isn't as flowing as it could be. It would look better if it was burned out of existance gradually, rather than all at once like it is.
My best,
Nuker
For starters, I think it would be really cool if the text could have a ghost image of the NOD logo behind it (in the negative space between the lines).
Secondly, and lastly, the NOD logo being blackened out on the right hand corner isn't as flowing as it could be. It would look better if it was burned out of existance gradually, rather than all at once like it is.
My best,
Nuker
E.V.E. 03 Mar 2007
I like the colors, but the Nod Logo should be able to see completely in my Opinon.
- E.V.E.
- E.V.E.
Sic 03 Mar 2007
Very nice, but as the above persons, I think you should let the Nod logo be seen, just shoot up some scratch brushes on it .
Warbz 15 Mar 2007
a moment of inspiration:
plain yet classy:
one of my previous ones improved:
Edited by Warbz, 29 March 2007 - 21:40.
plain yet classy:
one of my previous ones improved:
Edited by Warbz, 29 March 2007 - 21:40.
Athena 16 Mar 2007
Is the last one supposed to be partially transparent? Because here it's blueish, but a slightly different blue than the Estudios skin.
Maybe a bit more could be done with the border. Other than that, I like it .
The Crazykenny one is nice. Much too large for a sig, but just as imagine it is nice.
The simplicity in the second one I like.
Maybe a bit more could be done with the border. Other than that, I like it .
The Crazykenny one is nice. Much too large for a sig, but just as imagine it is nice.
The simplicity in the second one I like.
Warbz 16 Mar 2007
1st isnt so much a sig as just something i made cos i was bored n when i finished, i just though of ken.
the third one the top right isnt actually an image apart from the few pixels i forgot to remove, its a PNG file so i dont no why u see it as a diff blue.
the third one the top right isnt actually an image apart from the few pixels i forgot to remove, its a PNG file so i dont no why u see it as a diff blue.
Athena 17 Mar 2007
I don't see it as different here in Windows 2000, when I used Linux I did see it as different :S. Odd. It looks better here in Windows2000 .
Warbz 17 Mar 2007
joy. i must be so good at this whole sig thing as u r the only who seems to have bothered lookin ¬_¬.
no offence blat.
no offence blat.
Sgt. Nuker 17 Mar 2007
Warbz, on 15 Mar 2007, 16:07, said:
a moment of inspiration:
plain yet classy:
one of my previous ones improved:
plain yet classy:
one of my previous ones improved:
To the first one, although I absolutely adore the nuclear theme, it is far too large to be a sig. Maybe if you scaled it down, and gave it some kind of appropriate border it would be as Austin Powers says "dead sexy".
The second one does have a classic and simplistic feel to it, which is sometimes all you need. Something simple can say much more than something fancy. While the font isn't a bad choice, personally I'd use something a bit more elegant, or one that looks like caligraphy.
Last, but not least, your updated NOD sig. The NOD logo, although it belongs to the pruposed "bad guys", does deserve to be seen as a whole. The torn off corner technique is good, but because of its location, sort of detracts from the sig because part of the logo was torn off.
In order of appearance:
8.5/10
9/10
8/10
My best,
Nuker
Warbz 18 Mar 2007
thx.
but as i said the nuke pic isnt s'possed to be a sig.
i just made it cos i was bored
im well chuffed with this one.
but as i said the nuke pic isnt s'possed to be a sig.
i just made it cos i was bored
im well chuffed with this one.
Warbz 18 Mar 2007
background was from a harvester concept pic. the mammoth from another concept pic and the men from the BG of yet another concept pic.
thens i added a bit of blur and lens flare etc.
thens i added a bit of blur and lens flare etc.
E.V.E. 18 Mar 2007
It maybe looks a bit simple, but I sure like it, especially the Mammoth.
- E.V.E.
- E.V.E.
Warbz 18 Mar 2007
thx.
i was quite surprised how well i managed to blend the images into each other
i was quite surprised how well i managed to blend the images into each other
Sgt. Nuker 19 Mar 2007
Simple yet very satisfying I should think. Well done. (8/10)
My best,
Nuker
My best,
Nuker
Warbz 26 Mar 2007
a hover tank i made.
my 3rd attempt at 3ds max.
most of u saw my 1st and my 2nd got lost (virus :( )
i see no-one cared about my last post. :(
Edited by Warbz, 26 March 2007 - 21:12.
Sic 26 Mar 2007
That's got a little too much polies I think .
Looks nice nonetheless. I suggest making the chassis more realistic though. But, the barrel is awesome.
Looks nice nonetheless. I suggest making the chassis more realistic though. But, the barrel is awesome.
Warbz 26 Mar 2007
thx.
current poly's= just over 3000. i think cnc3 units can have over 4000... i think
current poly's= just over 3000. i think cnc3 units can have over 4000... i think
Warbz 27 Mar 2007
tank render
ever seen the film 300?
well this was like that.
all the units below plus some archers that legged it b4 the the 1st wave of attacks.
the stats:
Edited by Warbz, 27 March 2007 - 17:36.