Again the damage areas discussion: Yay or...
Sgt. Rho
16 Jun 2008
Here is a video of the guardian tank reciving missile fire from the rear and from the face. Though, with exagerated values.
So what would you think about tanks and vehicles taking more damage from the rear than from the front and side?
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=1W3uOI5a7i8
So what would you think about tanks and vehicles taking more damage from the rear than from the front and side?
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=1W3uOI5a7i8
Strategia
17 Jun 2008
Yea/Yay. I love it when games do this. This way, flanking/surrounding actually means something 
Sgt. Rho
17 Jun 2008
I previously said, ambushing a few tanks with AT infantry means death to the tanks, this is what I meant 
BeefJeRKy
17 Jun 2008
Sounds interesting to say the least. This mod is for Kane's Wrath or Red Alert 3?
Kris
04 Jul 2008
Master_Chief, on 18 Jun 2008, 5:43, said:
RA3
Wat?
Also, Go ahead with it. Looks nifty.
EDIT: HOLY CRAP, Didn't knew how old was this thread X_X!
Edited by Chris, 04 July 2008 - 00:03.
General Kirkov
03 Mar 2009
Yay, most military vehicles have more armour forward, since thats where they will be taking "heat" if its doable, and the thread suggests that it is, go for it!
Holy shit I necroed a topic, please don't kill me, I hadn't even realized EA released an SDK for RA3...
So thus I award myself;
Which comes with a neat ribbon'
Edited by General Kirkov, 03 March 2009 - 01:41.
Holy shit I necroed a topic, please don't kill me, I hadn't even realized EA released an SDK for RA3...
So thus I award myself;
Which comes with a neat ribbon'
Edited by General Kirkov, 03 March 2009 - 01:41.
Libains
03 Mar 2009
They haven't released the SDK yet, hence it's impossible to know if this is possible, as the system is not implemented to any degree in RA3.
Sgt. Rho
03 Mar 2009
Actually, yes, RA3 has that system, I've seen some units take more damage from behind than from in front.
CJ
03 Mar 2009
Sgt. Rho, on 3 Mar 2009, 11:57, said:
Actually, yes, RA3 has that system, I've seen some units take more damage from behind than from in front.
+1
The pacifier for example : when he uses his shield, he takes the same damage as when he doesn't have the shield if hit from behind
Libains
03 Mar 2009
Basic Allied infantryman. I was under the impression that he took less damage from all sides, as I've seen no noticeable difference depending on where he is shot from.
Sgt. Rho
03 Mar 2009
Oh, right....yes, he takes a lot more damage from behind than from in front while using the shield.
Libains
03 Mar 2009
Sgt. Rho, on 3 Mar 2009, 23:17, said:
Oh, right....yes, he takes a lot more damage from behind than from in front while using the shield.
In that case, it would prove to be highly successful to implement this across the whole range of units. Best of luck with it - I am in no doubt it will be quite some endeavor.
Ascendancy
04 Mar 2009
I think that this is a good idea, to make rear armor way more vulnerable than front/side armor, as the engine is usually located in the rear of the tank, thus being more vulnerable.
You got my thumbs up on this.
Edited by Ascendancy, 04 March 2009 - 03:40.
You got my thumbs up on this.
Edited by Ascendancy, 04 March 2009 - 03:40.
