

Wow, Empire Earth II really does suck...
#26
Posted 02 August 2007 - 18:32
#27
Posted 02 August 2007 - 19:03
Rayburn, on 2 Aug 2007, 14:21, said:
Actually, that was lacking in Empire Earth 1 as well. It went from the Atomic Age (Modern) to immediately the digital age with radial differences. And EE2 has a modern epoch. 13, or whichever one when the Assault Rifleman comes in.

@Stategia:
Yeah, they got rid of the redundant and frankly useless Prehistoric age and made them make a little more sense.
@All:
How about you stop saying "IT SUCKS BALLS LOL". Because not everybody hates it, and your making yourself look stupid. I am not a fan of the AOE series, yet I don't parade or whore out dislike like that.
#28
Posted 02 August 2007 - 19:23
Nightshadow, on 2 Aug 2007, 21:03, said:
Rayburn, on 2 Aug 2007, 14:21, said:
Actually, that was lacking in Empire Earth 1 as well. It went from the Atomic Age (Modern) to immediately the digital age with radial differences. And EE2 has a modern epoch. 13, or whichever one when the Assault Rifleman comes in.

Then what do you call the Cybers, in the Digital/Nano/Space Age? The Modern Atomic Age is the time we live in, the Digital Age is ~2050-2100, the way I see it, and the Nano and Space Ages after that.
Quote
Yeah, they got rid of the redundant and frankly useless Prehistoric age and made them make a little more sense.
Yeah, OK, the prehistoric epoch was kinda strange and superfluous, but still. How do they make sense if they're just a number? At least in EEI you fought in the Middle Ages or the Atomic Age - WW1, not in "Epoch 4" or "Epoch 11". How would you react if they didn't call it the Renaissance after 1492, but Epoch 6 or something? It's just stupid.
#29
Posted 02 August 2007 - 20:34
Alias, on 2 Aug 2007, 0:59, said:
Grim Reaper, on 2 Aug 2007, 14:08, said:
Two games almost exactly like it:
Age of Empires III
Empire: Dawn of the Modern World
Apart from the fact Empires: DotMW is tenfold better than EE2.
The gameplay is almost exactly the same. I'll admit, it was fun for awhile until I realized how many other games were almost just like it.
#30
Posted 02 August 2007 - 22:00
Strategia, on 2 Aug 2007, 15:23, said:
Nightshadow, on 2 Aug 2007, 21:03, said:
Rayburn, on 2 Aug 2007, 14:21, said:
Actually, that was lacking in Empire Earth 1 as well. It went from the Atomic Age (Modern) to immediately the digital age with radial differences. And EE2 has a modern epoch. 13, or whichever one when the Assault Rifleman comes in.

Then what do you call the Cybers, in the Digital/Nano/Space Age? The Modern Atomic Age is the time we live in, the Digital Age is ~2050-2100, the way I see it, and the Nano and Space Ages after that.
Quote
Yeah, they got rid of the redundant and frankly useless Prehistoric age and made them make a little more sense.
Yeah, OK, the prehistoric epoch was kinda strange and superfluous, but still. How do they make sense if they're just a number? At least in EEI you fought in the Middle Ages or the Atomic Age - WW1, not in "Epoch 4" or "Epoch 11". How would you react if they didn't call it the Renaissance after 1492, but Epoch 6 or something? It's just stupid.
In the expansion they marked the names in the skirmish menu, also where it has the epoch's number (Roman Numeral) for a little bit it says what the epoch is (Synthetic age, Age of Enlightenment, Copper Age..)
He said near-future, cybers and big zappy things don't look like recent future last I checked. *Looks out window* nope, no 3 story robots with sound guns.
In neither games where there something bridging the Modern-Age, and the future, at least in EE2 that's what the 5th age did with the old age, and the middle-ages/renaissance. EE1 had some bridges as well, but not the modern/future.
Another thing, civilization differences was utterly non-existent in EE1, Greece and China looked exactly alike. At least in EE2 they separate the looks by region, which is another plus.
#31
Posted 02 August 2007 - 23:02
Well anyway, I long since gave up on anything similar to Age of Empires. The last one of those I tried was AoE3 demo, it looked a lot nicer than any of its predecessors but it was so similar and sucked, IMO, so I stopped even trying things, I wouldn't be surprise if EE 3 was bad aswell.

Quote
#32
Posted 03 August 2007 - 01:19




Clicking on the picture will bring you to the latest part of the stories.
The Terran Invasions: A New Threat Part 5 is now up!
MOF: Lost and Found Epilogue is now up!
Red Storm, TI-Prologue, TI-Chapter 1, MOF #1, MOF #2, MOF # 3, MOF # 4, MOF # 5, MOF # 6
#33
Posted 03 August 2007 - 06:08

What I'm looking forward to though is AoE4. Going by images in the AoE3 special edition booklet, it will be 20th/21st century combat and since I was not greatly disappointed by AoE3 - though it was unfamiliar - I have no reason to dislike this one.
#35
Posted 03 August 2007 - 06:48
#36
Posted 03 August 2007 - 12:21
To be honest I never really understood EE1 editor. I never figured out the triggers. One last thing, is it me or does EE2's editor look a lot like the World Builder for generals.

#37
Posted 03 August 2007 - 12:28
Edited by Rayburn, 03 August 2007 - 12:38.
#38
Posted 03 August 2007 - 15:05
EDIT:
It's somewhere on this site.
http://ee.heavengame...e2h/index.shtml
Edited by Nightshadow, 03 August 2007 - 15:15.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users