Fallout Studios Forums

Source in cech language: Cech site
Some text in english: ...
Im really bad with english so this links... maybe after some time i would to a translate the cech text
Edited by Hax, 23 August 2007 - 08:13.

This is for real?

 Overdose, on 23 Aug 2007, 7:48, said:

i dont now but in cold war soviets has a project for invisible plane but has been oficialy closed for absence of much energy for this project. Some people speaking rumors about his unoficialy opening in 50. years - it was haves nuclear reactor on it (i dont now how to past time, shit, shit). It was based on strong electromagnetic field that makes fotons bend on that field - like air in wind channel on the surface of car. Fotons has carriers of beam/light energy...

please, someone help me with english
Edited by Hax, 23 August 2007 - 08:03.

Its bullshit. The most advance project that Russia currently has is the Pak-FA. Invisible jets are not gonna happen. The klingons still haven't accepted our earthling bid on the cloaking device.

lol this is just stupid...
what next light speed shoes?

i think Mig-1337 Has that capability.

Leave that to F1337

pproblem is that the F1337 will cost 1337Billion $$$ too.

I digress.

I herd that the new MiG would handle up to 1337 G of stress, huh

 Waris, on 23 Aug 2007, 13:38, said:

product: new particle efect

 Hax, on 23 Aug 2007, 3:02, said:

Both the US and Russia experimented with nuclear powered bombers at one point, but neither of them went anywhere with it for the obvious reasons.
http://www.aviation-...uke-bombers.htm
http://www.aviation-...ke-american.htm

As for optic camouflage, the the rumor is that the Boeing Bird of Prey experimented with it, so I would be surprised if Russia wasn't working along the same lines.

 SaintPsycho, on 23 Aug 2007, 8:13, said:

*tucks away his prototype shoes*

MiG-1's, MiG-3's, MiG-17's and 15's and 9's and 29's and 27's and 25's and 23's

Why 56? I'm fairly certain there are no even-number production model MiGs out there.

Total bullshit if you ask me.

You're right Boidy. Odd numbers are for the fighter planes. Even numbers were for the bombers IIRC.

As for the "photo", I think it's been PS'd.


Regards,

Nuker

There are even numbered fighters. Those are the prototypes, like the T-50, Mig-2000, or Mig 1.42/44.


edited because I wrote odd instead of even
Edited by narboza22, 24 August 2007 - 04:02.

 Prophet of the Pimps, on 23 Aug 2007, 4:58, said:

PAK-FA, Russias very late and still in prototype stage response to the raptor lol...


Anyways, i'm personally more interested in plasma stealth (go google it and look on wiki) from russia. but unfortunately, as it looks right now, the chances of russia making a top quality fighter competetive with the new generation (rafale, EF, gripen (not really the gripen lol), raptor) are almost none., THey are simply too poor. They had a nmber of very promising designs from Mikoyan Gurevich and Sukhoi, those being the Mig-29M/K, Mig 1.42/1.44 and the Su-37. But they were simply too poor to afford them, the 37 and 29 are simply upgrades of existing fighters, and the new mig ain't that expensive (comparitively to the raptor), ithe chances of russia being able to pay for something better than those is not likely at all.

Seems like even if a plane were to be invisible it wouldn't be that much help since vapor trails and radar would just give its position away anyways.

 narboza22, on 23 Aug 2007, 19:16, said:

The "T" as in Type designator is reserved for tanks in Russia and in China and probably a few other countries that Russia sold tanks to. :stickattack3:

T-34, T-55, T-72, T-80, T-88, T-90, T99, ect...

 Capt. Kirkov, on 24 Aug 2007, 8:02, said:

No.

Speaking of invisible planes:

That must be fun to wash a Plane like that.

- E.V.E.

The plane doesn't exist :\ Shame on that evil guy who posted this fantasy.

Quote

The problem of such camo is that it's physically impossible. There are only two ways - to make the whole plane from something transparent (which is unimaginable) and the second to cover all of the plane with camera-video projectors. The first one mean that you must make everything from glass\plastic, the second one means that this plane will cost as an air-craft factory and will eat energy as a little village. Although, the plane's detectability in the range of electronic devices grows in times.
This mean that even if USA will manage to build it, it will 1 craft with attached nuclear reactor, unvisible for eyes of guys, but superb-visional for all radars, SAMs and planes around. Saying shortly - total bullshit


However, we DID created a plane with nuclear reactor that even flown, he-he :drunk:

Tu-95LL - "Flying laboratory"



But, however, a crash of such plane could be quite ecologically unhealthy...
Edited by AL_Hassan, 12 September 2007 - 20:17.

You're a little off there. It is very possible to bend light around an object. That's the idea behind optic camouflage.

Like CNC Nod stealth technology. Makes a "Bubble" around object that bends light.
If you wanted it to be invisible, just cover it in mirrors.

Wasn't there a camo under development for soldiers in the US? I read about in NatGeo and the theory sounds quite possible. Basically, it's just light refraction. Sure, it's not entirely invisible, but on a plane, who would notice that piece of sky that looks a tad different to the rest?