Edited by Rayburn, 01 December 2007 - 08:40.


Call of Duty 4
#26
Posted 01 December 2007 - 08:40
#27
Posted 01 December 2007 - 13:40
The only Reason I used the RPG some time was because of the Challenge.
You get Experience Points when you are able to kill 2 People with one Single RPG. That may sound a bit complicated but ... there exists a identic Challenge, just with Claymores. And thats something I don't know how to realize.
Has anyone ever killed 2 Peoples with one Claymore? If yes, could you please tell me the best way to do it?
Im quite frustrated about it, because all other Challenges I did with nearly no sweat.
- E.V.E.

#28
Posted 01 December 2007 - 13:48
Regarding the specific example of the Claymore-challenge, just use them to cover certain places like you always do.
Sooner or later, it will be TWO people who run into it. It's all about chance here.
Edited by Rayburn, 01 December 2007 - 13:52.
#29
Posted 02 December 2007 - 00:45

Do you already have the Overkill Perk, Rayburn?
If yes, what is you're Favourite Mix of Weapons? I use the G36 and the Auto Shot Gun, it's ownage and a good Combination.
Does anyone else have interessting Overkill Combos?
- E.V.E.

#30
Posted 02 December 2007 - 08:36
1. G36C+Grenadelauncher / W1200+Handle
2. M16+Silencer / M21+ACOG
3. M60+Handle / Uzi
4. MP5+Silencer / G3+Red-Dot-Sights
5. R700+AK74U
#1 is pretty cool so far. It's awesome for close-/mid-range and very flexible
#2 kicked arse without the M21 and now it's even deadlier
#3 The Uzi on this one is more of a gimmick as I usually don't last long enough to run out of mg-ammo but if I unlock the silencer, it might be of use too
#4 Originally, it was only the G3 but I added the MP5 for stealth and the ability to react on ambushes since the G3 is only semi-auto
#5 I can't say that I like the R700 with it's enormous recoil, bad ammo-supply and apparent inaccuracy but I'll stick to it till I get the 50. If that one is even worse for some incomprehensible reason, I'll get right back to my beloved M40. It's bland but I can bloody well rely on it unlike the R700
Edited by Rayburn, 02 December 2007 - 12:12.
#31
Posted 02 December 2007 - 12:07
Edited by Warbz, 02 December 2007 - 12:08.

#32
Posted 02 December 2007 - 12:11
#33
Posted 03 December 2007 - 00:17
The m14 is also very good as a medium range weapon. It almosts beats the M16 sniping wise, although i like the 3 round bursts with double tap.
#34
Posted 03 December 2007 - 13:21
T-34, on 3 Dec 2007, 1:17, said:
I'm starting to agree with that. The recoil is way too heavy and totally unjustified since the gun is minimally stronger than the M40 but also less accurate. Too many drawbacks for too little gain, especially since most sniper-rifles are 1-hit-kills anyway if you play hardcore mode like me. Even the M21 slaughters most people in one shot.
Speaking of which, I'm using it with an ACOG scope and wonder: does it really lose THAT much range because of the scope? Yesterday, I zeroed in on two targets in an alleyway. The first guy dropped dead after one shot but the other bloke just stood there firing at my whilst I fired my entire mag with zero effect. He was like one metre behind the guy I did shoot, so I wonder if it's really the scope that cuts my range that drastically. I SHOULD have hit him easily.
Edited by Rayburn, 03 December 2007 - 13:22.
#35
Posted 03 December 2007 - 15:50
but the single player is intense! the gameplay is great (throw a flashbang, run into the room, shotgun someone, knife the next guy, then pull out your m16 and mow down the guys who are retreating)
the story is great, although its kinda wierd that there has already been two levels where you dont do anything but die in the end. (the president level and the one after the nuke... the one after the nuke was really freaking creepy). Right now i am on the second Chernobyl level... the part where you take the shot was really fun.
what do you guys think of the SP
#36
Posted 03 December 2007 - 17:02
The story doesn't have any twists but I didn't expect it to be a Tom Clancy novel anyway. Zakhaev could have been designed differently though. He is very easy to hate - especially at the end - which is good for a villain but he isn't the scary kind antagonist since he looks more like a hobo from under a bridge than the malevolent Russian nationalist that he is supposed to be. His son also looks like the sniper-guy from the film Behind Enemy Lines.
Edited by Rayburn, 03 December 2007 - 17:03.
#37
Posted 07 December 2007 - 22:58
For anyone reading this who doesn't have it yet

The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm


#38
Posted 08 December 2007 - 04:12
everyone knows about that level, its near the beginning of the game, and has little relevence to the story, you dont really nned to censor it
Edited by Dachamp, 08 December 2007 - 04:22.
#39
Posted 08 December 2007 - 04:28
#40
Posted 08 December 2007 - 10:39
#41
Posted 09 December 2007 - 19:52
#42
Posted 09 December 2007 - 20:09
It's realy hard, but it's entertaining as hell, I promise.

- E.V.E.

#43
Posted 09 December 2007 - 20:25
Did anyone manage to hit the Hind with an RPG in the truck pursuit mission?
It's so bloody hard to hit the damn thing, perhaps there is a different ending to the game if one really does it? Who knows...?
Edited by Rayburn, 09 December 2007 - 20:25.
#44
Posted 09 December 2007 - 20:35
#45
Posted 12 December 2007 - 23:35


Gamertag: Mobza


Visit Mobzchester
Quote
#46
Posted 13 December 2007 - 15:26
#47
Posted 13 December 2007 - 15:34
#48
Posted 13 December 2007 - 15:54
Rayburn, on 13 Dec 2007, 16:26, said:
Well I haven't seen it yet, is it a multiplayer mode? If not, it doesn't exist for the PC.
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm


#49
Posted 14 December 2007 - 15:20
#50
Posted 15 December 2007 - 16:49
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users