

Anime vs Real women
#26
Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:37
Secondly, "'To admire an inhuman figure over a human figure is to degrade the human figure.' a opinion "
Where on earth do you get this argument. If there are two boxes on two shelves that are vertically stacked, would not switching the boxes' placement cause one box to become less noticed and the other more? To position one above the other is to position the other under the one. That's just simple logic.
#27
Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:41
It's just the way our brain is wired up, man. And it's anyone's right to do whatever they want with their imagination.
Quote
Therefore: Some find human forms to be sexually appealing.
Almost everyone is capable of finding both "appealing". Do you even know what the initial premise for this discussion is? Obviously you do, because you set it for yourself when you started typing.

Edited by Mathias, 20 December 2007 - 08:42.

Ask me questions about audio technical matters or DAWs!
#28
Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:49
it does not degrade the value of the box since value is subjective so the overall value has not changed just the perception
to that individual and they have the right to think that way.
its not that i don't agree with that opinion its still a opinion I for one like true human form over fantasy any day its true so far i have yet to be able to experience it all. but i do know that fantasy is just that fantasy. and in my opinion its nothing someone should get so absorbed in that they loose sight of this world
Edited by cryptkeeper, 20 December 2007 - 08:51.
#29
Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:51
And to point to the above post: It is my view that fantasy causes more harm than good. Illusion versus reality, reality wins. It would take a series of essays of mine to back this one up, so do me a favor and just google it.
Edited by Boidy, 20 December 2007 - 08:53.
#30
Posted 20 December 2007 - 09:00
so its all in how you handle your fantasies
Edited by cryptkeeper, 20 December 2007 - 09:03.
#31
#32
Posted 20 December 2007 - 10:48
Boidy, on 20 Dec 2007, 9:51, said:
Does that say anything about the worth of your opinions?
Boidy, on 20 Dec 2007, 9:51, said:
I see, objectifying cartoon women is degrading to real women. That makes alot of sense, except for that it doesn't make sense in any possible way. I think you need to learn to separate reality from fantasy.
Boidy, on 20 Dec 2007, 9:51, said:
Be smart, now. To anyone, it would take a LOT of escapism to completely eschew reality in favor of fantasy. Of course reality weighs in heavier than fantasy. But that doesn't have as much to say regarding this topic as you seem to think.
Now, explain me why fantasy causes more harm than good, because I refuse to "just google it" in a heated discussion on a discussion forum.

Ask me questions about audio technical matters or DAWs!
#33
Posted 20 December 2007 - 13:43
Also i would like to show this painting from magritte:

If you don't know french, it says "this is not a pipe"
Now you may be thinking, what the hell? It has the proportions of a pipe, it has the colouring of a pipe.... but at the end of the day its just a representation of a pipe. It never has and never will be a pipe. Similarly to anime and photographs a like, they are just representations of objects (or in this argument women)
One could argue that photographs are at least of "real" women, but as i mentioned before, photographs are often photoshoped... yes they were orginally photos of a real women.. but at what point does it become not real? 1 inch of the waist? 2? No, before photoshoping has even taken place.
#35
Posted 20 December 2007 - 18:06
#36
Posted 20 December 2007 - 18:10
#37
Posted 20 December 2007 - 18:20
#38
Posted 20 December 2007 - 18:20
We are enjoying a virtual war simulation, and there are probably a lot of people in the world who would call that sick and weird, too.
As long as nobody is harmed, why do you want to generate hatred and declare a group of people unnormal or inferior?
#39
Posted 20 December 2007 - 18:30
like that picture that boidy showed thats unattractive to me
Edited by cryptkeeper, 20 December 2007 - 18:34.
#40
Posted 20 December 2007 - 18:56
cryptkeeper, on 20 Dec 2007, 18:30, said:
like that picture that boidy showed thats unattractive to me
Ah so its just like "theres something about it" sort of thing?
I dont ant to cause division i'm just wondering.
#41
Posted 20 December 2007 - 19:05
#42
Posted 09 January 2008 - 14:37
Bob, on 20 Dec 2007, 0:09, said:
Yes well, me too
just cos i find this nice to look at:

i prefer this to look at:

Bob, on 20 Dec 2007, 13:43, said:
Also i would like to show this painting from magritte:

If you don't know french, it says "this is not a pipe"
Now you may be thinking, what the hell? It has the proportions of a pipe, it has the colouring of a pipe.... but at the end of the day its just a representation of a pipe. It never has and never will be a pipe. Similarly to anime and photographs a like, they are just representations of objects (or in this argument women)
One could argue that photographs are at least of "real" women, but as i mentioned before, photographs are often photoshoped... yes they were orginally photos of a real women.. but at what point does it become not real? 1 inch of the waist? 2? No, before photoshoping has even taken place.
DUDE i am NEVER gonna argue w/ u
Edited by Rabid Dawg, 09 January 2008 - 14:41.
#43
Posted 09 January 2008 - 15:31
#46
Posted 09 January 2008 - 22:03
(I always wanted to do this.

Edited by Lλmbda, 09 January 2008 - 22:03.
#48
Posted 09 January 2008 - 22:06

- E.V.E.
EDIT: Crap, that went nowhere ...
Thread Closed by Comr4de
Edited by E.V.E., 09 January 2008 - 22:08.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users