Rate teh Siggy!
Dr.Schwarzk0pf
13 Oct 2006
9/10 for co-leader sig
10/10 for Red ShW Army
Avg. 9.5/10
Edited by Dr.$chw4r2k06f, 13 October 2006 - 18:02.
10/10 for Red ShW Army
Avg. 9.5/10
Edited by Dr.$chw4r2k06f, 13 October 2006 - 18:02.
Whitey
14 Oct 2006
6, Shockwave banner = just dead, dead and buried.
The mappers guild sig is just a bit boring.
The mappers guild sig is just a bit boring.
Whitey
14 Oct 2006
5, too ... I don't know I just hate the style.
And your captions ain't much better now.
And your captions ain't much better now.
ngm_zh
22 Oct 2006
9/10
because I like Tekken , I like that ninja . + Matrix is one of my fav. Movi&Game .
==\ Now I just here to see what the next person will give my sigh out of 10 , I just mad it yesterday
because I like Tekken , I like that ninja . + Matrix is one of my fav. Movi&Game .
==\ Now I just here to see what the next person will give my sigh out of 10 , I just mad it yesterday

ngm_zh
22 Oct 2006
Fix It little ,
10/10
I like the TV animation , the back ground fit the sigh and the supject like your avatar + Bob mad it
, Extra Point for Bob's sigh
10/10
I like the TV animation , the back ground fit the sigh and the supject like your avatar + Bob mad it


Mathias
22 Oct 2006
6/10, 7/10 if those white letters hadn't disappeared. Also try adding a stroke or a simple border.
Nexolate
22 Oct 2006
8/10
There's a need for colour, but when it gets towards a rainbow-state it turns me off. =/
There's a need for colour, but when it gets towards a rainbow-state it turns me off. =/
Mathias
22 Oct 2006
8/10
I really can't make any sense out of your post. You say it needs color, then you say you're turned off by all the color?
I really can't make any sense out of your post. You say it needs color, then you say you're turned off by all the color?
Nexolate
22 Oct 2006
Cycerin, on 22 Oct 2006, 22:24, said:
I really can't make any sense out of your post. You say it needs color, then you say you're turned off by all the color?
I meant in general.
If a sig's totally black and white, it's bland and boring to look at.
If a sig's rainbow-tastic, it doesn't flow and seems odd. (This is where yours is.)
9/10
Awesome sig by Bob. =D
Mathias
23 Oct 2006
7/10. Refreshing caption but the direction looks a bit vague to me.
I meant in general.
If a sig's totally black and white, it's bland and boring to look at.
If a sig's rainbow-tastic, it doesn't flow and seems odd. (This is where yours is.)
Rainbow-tastic? Look, my choice of using lots of colors is entirely intentional. You make it sound like I screwed up and created something ridicolous. And that pisses me off...
Edited by Cycerin, 23 October 2006 - 00:33.
No-Skillz, on 22 Oct 2006, 23:52, said:
Cycerin, on 22 Oct 2006, 22:24, said:
I really can't make any sense out of your post. You say it needs color, then you say you're turned off by all the color?
I meant in general.
If a sig's totally black and white, it's bland and boring to look at.
If a sig's rainbow-tastic, it doesn't flow and seems odd. (This is where yours is.)
Rainbow-tastic? Look, my choice of using lots of colors is entirely intentional. You make it sound like I screwed up and created something ridicolous. And that pisses me off...
Edited by Cycerin, 23 October 2006 - 00:33.
AllStarZ
23 Oct 2006
9/10 for managing to own a SW team sig with cool SFX.
7.8/10 for the sig below. Colours don't look right for some reason. Green, purple, orange, etc.
Edited by AllStarZ, 23 October 2006 - 00:59.
7.8/10 for the sig below. Colours don't look right for some reason. Green, purple, orange, etc.
Edited by AllStarZ, 23 October 2006 - 00:59.
Areze
23 Oct 2006
I kinda like it. The ship is cool, and the colors seem to match up to me 
I cant find a proper photoshop link, so i made mine via MS paint and two screenies. If some one could give me a link that would be cool
Edited by Qaman123, 23 October 2006 - 02:58.

I cant find a proper photoshop link, so i made mine via MS paint and two screenies. If some one could give me a link that would be cool

Edited by Qaman123, 23 October 2006 - 02:58.
Nexolate
23 Oct 2006
Cycerin, on 23 Oct 2006, 01:19, said:
Rainbow-tastic? Look, my choice of using lots of colors is entirely intentional. You make it sound like I screwed up and created something ridicolous. And that pisses me off...
Again I was referring to in general. Now while it's obvious your sig isn't "rainbow-tastic" it's kind of hard to see the "flow" of the sig because of the use of more than 4 colours. (In My Opinion.)
I'm sorry if I offended you, I don't mean to offend anyone without making it blatantly obvious. I suppose I exaggerated with my use of the term for "Lots of colours" and for that, I apologise.
4/10
It's not exactly the best sig I've seen. =/
EDIT: There is no link. You either Buy it full from Adobe or you download it through Filesharers/Torrents.
Edited by No-Skillz, 23 October 2006 - 05:35.
Nexolate
23 Oct 2006
What? No one wants to rate Billy's Sig? o_O
Fine, I will.
8/10
Nice and Simple, one of your best my friend. *Thumbs up.*
Fine, I will.
8/10
Nice and Simple, one of your best my friend. *Thumbs up.*
Mathias
25 Oct 2006
8/10, 9/10 if there was some sliiiight color on the background, maybe if you slapped on a red lighting effect, a subtle one. I love how the scope breaks with the shape of the border.
