

Boycotting Red Alert 3
#51
Posted 28 February 2008 - 01:12

#52
Posted 28 February 2008 - 01:16
{LP}Admiral-(NL), on 28 Feb 2008, 0:37, said:
I'll believe it when I see it in official lettering.
Getting a bit sick of these rumours now, TBH. If you are going to say something, then at least back it up with some links, guys.
#53
Posted 28 February 2008 - 01:53
#54
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:00
I still refuse to believe they would remove an iconic superweapon from the Soviets.
#55
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:01
~SLG
#56
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:03
*edit*
Maybe it'll have bolts that travel from unit to unit like those water fountains at Epcot.

Edited by thinimus, 28 February 2008 - 02:04.
#57
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:05
That's totally ridiculous, Admiral.

Sensors

Weapons systems

All Systems Nominal.
#58
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:12
Yes, there were morons who actually believed Red Alert 3 wasn't a C&C because EA announced it simply as "Red Alert 3". Sad, but people who are taken in by information like that are the fools who fall for pyramid schemes and send their credit card details via email.
The glass is half empty.
#60
Posted 28 February 2008 - 02:45

Sensors

Weapons systems

All Systems Nominal.
#61
Posted 28 February 2008 - 03:52
KiraSama, on 26 Feb 2008, 17:46, said:
Quote
actually as far i can see, half of the new units are old units with a new model, and the actually real original units are beging droped, last i hear is they wanted to drop the Thor, to me as far as i know starcraft 2 looks more a expansion pack
The only gripe I have with SC 2 is the Banshee and the Viking.
#65
#66
#67
Posted 28 February 2008 - 15:31
#69
Posted 28 February 2008 - 17:58

Hopefully, if there is no nuke, there shall be an anti matter bomb...
#70
Posted 28 February 2008 - 19:21
#71
Posted 28 February 2008 - 20:38
Fun fact: The nuke was in every game except Tiberian Sun (and sole survivor?)
Edited by Huntez, 28 February 2008 - 20:38.
#72
Posted 29 February 2008 - 00:27
Edited by nova, 29 February 2008 - 00:28.
#73
Posted 29 February 2008 - 00:31
http://forum.cncreneclips.com/index.php?sh...st&p=405574
It's a shame to lose the nuke but if it wasn't done I'm sure people would complain EA are being lazy and re-using old ideas.
#74
Posted 29 February 2008 - 01:47

#75
Posted 29 February 2008 - 02:52
I dont see why there is a big problem with Japan as the third faction? They put Yuri in as the third one in RA2. And RA2 had a couple of big issues in my opinion that could have been avoided.


1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users