nuke cannons actually exist?
Waris 11 May 2008
Is it because photographers are placed from a H-bomb detonation further away than they would a fission bomb detonation?
CodeCat 11 May 2008
That would likely be it. Depending on the yield of the weapon, a few km can be a safe distance, or well over 30 km or more. But pressure waves still go at the same speed.
Dr. Strangelove 12 May 2008
Waris, on 11 May 2008, 10:45, said:
Is it because photographers are placed from a H-bomb detonation further away than they would a fission bomb detonation?
Yes. You wouldn't want to get them mixed up
I gues it must be because they stood closer than 20 clicks from the test because 1 minute just doesn't sound right.
AllStarZ 12 May 2008
Do you know why we hear a sound when an explosion occurs? The "explosive sound"?
Dr. Strangelove 12 May 2008
AllStarZ 12 May 2008
Zero 12 May 2008
Actually the nuke cannon wouldn't of killed itself, that was the nuke rifle they were building for the jetpack, hoverjeep, and jeep (the radiation would've kiled them or at least harmed them) but the nuke cannon worked perfectly but was cancelled, it was impractical when you think about it, it would've killed any infantry it was supporting. Also, it was HEAVY, SLOW, EXPENSIVE, VULNERABLE, and having nuclear shells on it, if it would've been hit it could've leaked or worse.......
CodeCat 12 May 2008
AllStarZ, on 12 May 2008, 10:33, said:
Yes, but why don't we instead hear a swish? Instead of that ripping throaty sort of noise?
A real-life nuke would sound more like thunder. Because of the distance, the sound is scattered and spread apart, and it is reflected from many directions. It would sound like a loud deep rumbling, not like a bang.
blacknapalm 14 May 2008
"If You Liked That...Youre Gunna LOVE This"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett...clear_device%29
Nuke Mortar [recoiless rifle actually] SICKEST WEAPON EVER bar none
Ive always been amazed that Hunter never gave these to Tao! But then..Nuke Mortarmen... about as OP as it gets!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett...clear_device%29
Nuke Mortar [recoiless rifle actually] SICKEST WEAPON EVER bar none
Ive always been amazed that Hunter never gave these to Tao! But then..Nuke Mortarmen... about as OP as it gets!
Zaho 14 May 2008
Hi! It's the first time I am writing. About the discussion of tactical nuclear arnament. Nuke cannons were first developed in USSR in the mid 1960's, they had a range of up to 60 km and were designated for defensive operations. Radiation prevents any chances of infantry to advance, as well as support vehicles. Only T-55 (the first tank for nuclear warfare) was able to do it. This may explain the reason why nearly 65 000 were built which is the most produced tank of all times. The second one was T-34/85 35 000 units.
As for modern warfare, tactical nukes are still in use, Russian battleships have tactical nuclear missles and shells. I think mig-35 is able to carry two tactical nuclear warheads as well.
As for modern warfare, tactical nukes are still in use, Russian battleships have tactical nuclear missles and shells. I think mig-35 is able to carry two tactical nuclear warheads as well.