Here is a video of the guardian tank reciving missile fire from the rear and from the face. Though, with exagerated values.
So what would you think about tanks and vehicles taking more damage from the rear than from the front and side?
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=1W3uOI5a7i8
0
Again the damage areas discussion: Yay or nay?
Started By Sgt. Rho, Jun 16 2008 12:57
35 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
#2
-
- Administrator
-
- 5852 posts
Whispery Wizard
Posted 16 June 2008 - 13:06
All i can say is if it works without bugs it would be a cool addition.
F O R T H E N S
#3
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
#4
-
- Project Team
-
- 3504 posts
The X General
-
Projects: Deep Impact (formerly EC)
#5
-
- Project Team
-
- 4073 posts
[Pantsu-Dan]
-
Projects: Commanding the ECA 33rd Ground Assault Team.
Posted 16 June 2008 - 13:35
Postcunt+ 1 for Yay
Black Lagoon OST
#7
-
- Member
-
- 488 posts
Veteran
Posted 17 June 2008 - 11:00
Realism? Oh shi- Yay!
Quote
It's well known fact that a vital ingredient of success is not knowing what what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a brickwall on the path of history.
Many thanks to Comrade KamuiK, is credit to team
#8
-
- Member
-
- 3154 posts
Mwuahahahahahahah
-
Projects: Minecraft, TCMM, sleep
Posted 17 June 2008 - 21:24
Yea/Yay. I love it when games do this. This way, flanking/surrounding actually means something 
#9
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
Posted 17 June 2008 - 21:30
I previously said, ambushing a few tanks with AT infantry means death to the tanks, this is what I meant 
#10
-
- Gold Member
-
- 5114 posts
Formerly known as Scopejim
-
Projects: Life
Posted 17 June 2008 - 21:35
Sounds interesting to say the least. This mod is for Kane's Wrath or Red Alert 3?
#11
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
#12
-
- Member
-
- 1870 posts
America's Rage Leader
-
Projects: Americas Rage
Posted 03 July 2008 - 14:34
Ai Sai Yai
#13
-
- Project Team
-
- 3825 posts
<Custom title available>
Posted 04 July 2008 - 00:02
Master_Chief, on 18 Jun 2008, 5:43, said:
RA3
Wat?
Also, Go ahead with it. Looks nifty.
EDIT: HOLY CRAP, Didn't knew how old was this thread X_X!
Edited by Chris, 04 July 2008 - 00:03.
#14
-
- Project Team
-
- 1252 posts
Your worst nightmare
-
Projects: EC Co-Leader and NLS Beta Tester
Posted 05 July 2008 - 16:31
I say YAY! 
#15
-
- Member
-
- 1749 posts
The very model of a modern major general...
-
Projects: MOF book!
Posted 03 March 2009 - 01:36
Yay, most military vehicles have more armour forward, since thats where they will be taking "heat" if its doable, and the thread suggests that it is, go for it!
Holy shit I necroed a topic, please don't kill me, I hadn't even realized EA released an SDK for RA3...
So thus I award myself;
Which comes with a neat ribbon'
Holy shit I necroed a topic, please don't kill me, I hadn't even realized EA released an SDK for RA3...
So thus I award myself;
Which comes with a neat ribbon'
Edited by General Kirkov, 03 March 2009 - 01:41.
All Proud Canadians put this Mapple Leaf Ribbon in your Signature! 
Clicking on the picture will bring you to the latest part of the stories.
The Terran Invasions: A New Threat Part 5 is now up!
MOF: Lost and Found Epilogue is now up!
Red Storm, TI-Prologue, TI-Chapter 1, MOF #1, MOF #2, MOF # 3, MOF # 4, MOF # 5, MOF # 6
Clicking on the picture will bring you to the latest part of the stories.
The Terran Invasions: A New Threat Part 5 is now up!
MOF: Lost and Found Epilogue is now up!
Red Storm, TI-Prologue, TI-Chapter 1, MOF #1, MOF #2, MOF # 3, MOF # 4, MOF # 5, MOF # 6
#16
-
- Gold Member
-
- 4950 posts
Light up life.
Posted 03 March 2009 - 01:48
They haven't released the SDK yet, hence it's impossible to know if this is possible, as the system is not implemented to any degree in RA3.
For there can be no death without life.
#17
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
Posted 03 March 2009 - 10:57
Actually, yes, RA3 has that system, I've seen some units take more damage from behind than from in front.
#18
-
- Member Test
-
- 2150 posts
Rocket soldier
-
Projects: Nothing yet
Posted 03 March 2009 - 14:13
Sgt. Rho, on 3 Mar 2009, 11:57, said:
Actually, yes, RA3 has that system, I've seen some units take more damage from behind than from in front.
+1
The pacifier for example : when he uses his shield, he takes the same damage as when he doesn't have the shield if hit from behind
Chyros, on 11 November 2013 - 18:21, said:
I bet I could program an internet
#19
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
Posted 03 March 2009 - 22:44
What was the pacifier again? 
#20
-
- Gold Member
-
- 4950 posts
Light up life.
Posted 03 March 2009 - 22:46
Basic Allied infantryman. I was under the impression that he took less damage from all sides, as I've seen no noticeable difference depending on where he is shot from.
For there can be no death without life.
#21
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
Posted 03 March 2009 - 23:17
Oh, right....yes, he takes a lot more damage from behind than from in front while using the shield.
#22
-
- Member
-
- 1136 posts
Man, myth, and legend
-
Projects: diji
Posted 03 March 2009 - 23:18
yay, it would b cool
#23
-
- Gold Member
-
- 4950 posts
Light up life.
Posted 03 March 2009 - 23:25
Sgt. Rho, on 3 Mar 2009, 23:17, said:
Oh, right....yes, he takes a lot more damage from behind than from in front while using the shield.
In that case, it would prove to be highly successful to implement this across the whole range of units. Best of luck with it - I am in no doubt it will be quite some endeavor.
For there can be no death without life.
#24
-
- Project Leader
-
- 6870 posts
Kerbal Rocket Scientist
-
Projects: Scaring Jebediah.
Posted 04 March 2009 - 01:16
That is an, a bit exagerated, test in CnC3.
#25
-
- Member
-
- 1293 posts
Needled 24/7
Posted 04 March 2009 - 03:40
I think that this is a good idea, to make rear armor way more vulnerable than front/side armor, as the engine is usually located in the rear of the tank, thus being more vulnerable.
You got my thumbs up on this.
You got my thumbs up on this.
Edited by Ascendancy, 04 March 2009 - 03:40.
Thanks to that awesome signature maker, Cattman2236.
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users
