Dating age differences
#1
Posted 18 October 2008 - 04:34
As for me, I got no idea. I seriously can't make up my mind.
Masonicon, on 17 Oct 2009, 13:44, said:
#2
Posted 18 October 2008 - 04:47
#3
Posted 18 October 2008 - 04:52
19681107
#4
Posted 18 October 2008 - 05:02
-Rorschach
#5
Posted 18 October 2008 - 05:07
I have dated women aged:
1. 18-20 (too feisty for me though)
2. 25
3. 36
4. 42 (Yes, she's a single mother. And she had proven me that a woman's age is like the age of brandy. The longer the age, the better it tastes. LOL )
Deduction?
1. If you're 21, do not date women whose age falls below 18. What if one morning Ms. Nymphomaniac wakes up and suddenly decide to sue you after that night of carnal pleasure? Well, that's an automatic Statutory Rape for you.). I repeat, do not go for below-eighteen young feisty ones, even if they're the ones who are itching to get their <obscene term> entered (sorry for the term, but I'm quite cynical about it).
2. Since you have mentioned dating in the workplace, I view this as unacceptable. A workplace should be treated as a workplace, promoting professional growth and not of "sensual" one. Dating should never occur in the workplace. It instigates conflicts of interests (the same reaosn why teachers should never date their students, or doctors date their patients, or lawyers date their clients.)
What if your co-worker dates outside the office hours? Depends, if he'll be discreet about it (and no, he was not, since the workplace knew about it). Having a relationship with a minor (provided that the workplace knew) only gives a negative impression in the workplace that you are not a professional, and unprofessional conduct is very untolerable in any case presented. Professionalism is professionalism. Business is business. Leave your personal agendas at the door.
Some lists of sexual unprofessionalism:
a. dating minors
b. dating first graders
c. transvesitism
d. sexual harrasment (Sexual harrasment is not about sex, it's about the abuse of power through sexual means.)
Overall, just keep it clean.
I guess that's it.
P.S. I was born almost sixty-five (65) years after the Russian Bolshevik Revolution.
Edited by The Wandering Jew, 18 October 2008 - 05:11.
"Once upon a time in 1700's, Imperial Britain had its share of terrorists...And they were called Americans."
#7
Posted 18 October 2008 - 06:47
But if it were outside of the workplace, its kinda has to be evaluated on a case by case basis. If it is working for them, then no reason why you should try and invent/point out where it is wrong or shouldn't happen.
#9
Posted 18 October 2008 - 10:29
Minimum partner age = (your age/2) + 7
Maximum partner age = (your age - 7) * 2
So for 21 he has the range of 17.5 (18 really) to 28 so it is creepy.
#10
Posted 18 October 2008 - 12:37
#12
Posted 18 October 2008 - 14:09
#13
Posted 24 October 2008 - 09:46
Being 21 year old male, dating a 28 year old woman, really, that's way beyond your league.
As an 18 year old that formula would bring me at a minimum of 16, which I can kind of support since 15 sounds superbly childish to me for some time now...
#14
Posted 27 October 2008 - 04:41
#15
Posted 28 October 2008 - 04:25
Dauth, on 18 Oct 2008, 22:09, said:
Ah, yes. College days. I remember. (rubs hands and smiles devilishly)
"Once upon a time in 1700's, Imperial Britain had its share of terrorists...And they were called Americans."
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users