

Wikipedia
#1
Posted 01 February 2009 - 20:54
Three hours and many many many topics later I emerged from wikipedia realizing I had stuff I needed to get done. I had also realized that I had read an incredibly broad amounts of topics, ranging from mass extinction to deep-sea giangantism to sexual dimorphism to small pox.
This has actually happened to me several times before as well, once I had delved into nuclear fusion and all relating topics, and another time into the history of kaliningrad and things relating to it.
So, has something like this ever happened to you? Have you ever just randomly dived into some topic on wikipedia out of curiosity, but then going spontaneously to any relating topic that sparked the smallest bit of interest, completely vaporizing several hours of your life?
Also, is there a specific term for this? Like 'wikistorm' or something equally catchy?
#3
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:06


Awesome radio
Quote
#6
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:21


Awesome radio
Quote
#8
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:27
Scope, on 1 Feb 2009, 21:16, said:

Me and my friends used to do it at college, i was the champion


F O R T H E N S

#10
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:35
Edited by Alias, 01 February 2009 - 21:35.

#11
#12
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:40
Pav3d, on 1 Feb 2009, 20:57, said:

Also for a term.... wikiwacking?
Sorry but I nearly fell of my chair at the thought of Pav3d having a wikiwack. Masturbation with a creative common license

Anyway back to topic, no I try and avoid going off tangent on wiki. It's bloody infuriating when you are trying to browse for something specific and you keep coming up against about 200 other articles, most of which are half baked and un-cited. I try and stick to the point. I can see the entertainment value though, more intellectual than My[whore]Space.
#14
Posted 01 February 2009 - 22:23
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm


#16
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:19
Those things are surprisingly similar. Ending up in hospital with your stomach being cleaned, or in bed with "bloody" eyes - feeling is same.

18.11.1991. REMEMBER VUKOVAR!
#17
Posted 02 February 2009 - 09:19
CodeCat, on 2 Feb 2009, 5:15, said:

Great minds...wiki alike

I'd admit, wiki is singlehandedly one of the most...useful/important thing...to me...that is in existence. I go from the Capella stars to Nuclear Fusion to Gadget to MOAB to Cows to Chickens to Harriers to Raptors to Gadflies to snails to love sticks and eventually those articles


#19
Posted 02 February 2009 - 19:44

#20
Posted 02 February 2009 - 19:52
As in, who can go from Domesticated Chimpanzees to Zero Hour in the fewest steps.

#21
Posted 02 February 2009 - 22:53
Alias, on 2 Feb 2009, 21:52, said:
As in, who can go from Domesticated Chimpanzees to Zero Hour in the fewest steps.

Chimpanzees -> television -> technology trends -> media violence research -> video game controversy -> Need for Speed: Most Wanted -> Electronic Arts -> List of Electronic Arts games -> Command & Conquer: Generals - Zero Hour.
8 steps.
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm


#22
Posted 03 February 2009 - 00:59
Destiny, on 2 Feb 2009, 9:19, said:
CodeCat, on 2 Feb 2009, 5:15, said:

I'd admit, wiki is singlehandedly one of the most...useful/important thing...to me...that is in existence. I go from the Capella stars to Nuclear Fusion to Gadget to MOAB to Cows to Chickens to Harriers to Raptors to Gadflies to snails to love sticks and eventually those articles

Yeah, I do that too, but usually MUCH more random.
Chyros, on 2 Feb 2009, 22:53, said:
Alias, on 2 Feb 2009, 21:52, said:
As in, who can go from Domesticated Chimpanzees to Zero Hour in the fewest steps.

Chimpanzees -> television -> technology trends -> media violence research -> video game controversy -> Need for Speed: Most Wanted -> Electronic Arts -> List of Electronic Arts games -> Command & Conquer: Generals - Zero Hour.
8 steps.
I believe you cannot use lists, so its a fail.
Oh, and as for what I look up. Usually it is science related until I get to complex calculations I cannot understand. Either that, or something religious. I'm with Chyros, pretty much anything...
One time I spent almost 17 hours on Wikipedia

Anyway, it IS like crack, almost like the forum. However, all I can say is cheers! Let's get drunk and sing some Danny Boy

......Oh, shit....give me a second to look up the lyrics first! *Wikis it*


[indent]Garrod "Newtype Killer" Ran[/indent]
#23
Posted 03 February 2009 - 01:20
Zero, on 2 Feb 2009, 19:59, said:

Well maybe with 17 hours it IS fair

Wikipedia is great for fun but its only use in research is to give me sources where I can find some more in depth knowledge.
#24
Posted 05 February 2009 - 05:54
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
--------------------
The name's Bond.
Covalent Bond.
#25
Posted 05 February 2009 - 08:04

Though I also praise it for guiding me through a few which I otherwise wouldn't've understood
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm


1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users