16 replies to this topic

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

Sig of the Week #85 Voting

Theme: Heroes
Voting Deadline: Sunday, 19th April 2009. Midnight GMT
Original Topic: SotW #85

Entries

Gen.Kenobi Source


Ragman


Pav3d

[WNxMastrefubu]

ragman paved kenobi /my vote

[Alias]

While Ragman's is visually superior, it's just "general standard C4D signature", Pav3d's has so much more style. I'm loving the font (especially the III) on it, unique is better than the same thing 300 times.

Pav3d
Ragman
Gen Kenobi

[NergiZed]

same as TPAM

Pav3d
Ragman
Gen Kenobi

[ΓΛPTΘΓ]

Same as above. Uniqueness is the key.

[partyzanpaulzy]

Pav3d is the first in my opinion (uniqueness, style),
Ragman's sig is also pretty nice, but the letters are hard to read
Gen Kenobi, this is just one step from MS Paint.

BTW, what was used in the Cinema 4D on Ragman's sig?

I think I will participate on some of these sig competitions when I have some free time (so not this nor next month).

[ΓΛPTΘΓ]

Well, I am not being mean or anything like that. But I think Gen.Kenobi's sig do not deserve a medal for sig of the week. The quality of work is in a different league compare to other entries.

I suggest if there is only 3 entering, it doesn't not make everyone antomatically have a medal.

e.g. 3 entering, only top 2 get the medal.

[Alias]

If you are so opposed to him getting a medal and think that it is so 'terrible' compared to everything else, why didn't you enter and as such 'supposedly' displace him from a medal.

[ΓΛPTΘΓ]

I would if I am not in Hong Kong lacking any photo editing capabilities.

[Wizard]

The level of technical skill involved in a sig doesn't determine the winner. And there is no reason someone who has a high level of photoshopping skills shouldn't win a medal if he wins through the popular vote. I personally love Pav3d's sig for its style over Ragman, although I know exactly the level of skill that goes into making his. This is art and there is no reason that Monet should beat a Banksey.

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

 ΓΛPΤΘΓ, on 19 Apr 2009, 11:27, said:

Well, I am not being mean or anything like that. But I think Gen.Kenobi's sig do not deserve a medal for sig of the week. The quality of work is in a different league compare to other entries.

I suggest if there is only 3 entering, it doesn't not make everyone antomatically have a medal.

e.g. 3 entering, only top 2 get the medal.

No way am I doing that, that is completely unfair. The sig may not be the best, but unlike a lot of other people he actually took the time to enter the competition.

[Ion Cannon!]

 ΓΛPΤΘΓ, on 19 Apr 2009, 11:27, said:

Well, I am not being mean or anything like that. But I think Gen.Kenobi's sig do not deserve a medal for sig of the week. The quality of work is in a different league compare to other entries.

I suggest if there is only 3 entering, it doesn't not make everyone antomatically have a medal.

e.g. 3 entering, only top 2 get the medal.

How would you feel back in your "New to sig making days" if someone had decided you didn't deserve a medal? Everyone has to start somewhere. And despite you stating otherwise, you are actually being mean.

[ΓΛPTΘΓ]

My bad, I take that back. However, the only point I want to make is when there is only 3 who enters, does not automatically earn you a medal no matter how good or bad the sigs are, when there is only three entering, only two should gets the medal.

EDIT: I really don't mean to hurt anyone, but just to make the point that when there is only three entering does not earn you a medal right away.

Edited by ΓΛPΤΘΓ, 19 April 2009 - 12:45.

[Alias]

For what reason though? I don't see anything wrong with someone getting a third place medal if there is only three people.

[Pav:3d]

Oh cmon Raptor its just a bit of fun.

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

Gen.Kenobi	 0 +  0 + 11 = 11
Ragman		15 + 12 +  0 = 27
Pav3d		 18 + 10 +  0 = 28

I don't have the correct fonts on my laptop to make the medals, so I will get them to you as soon as possible.

[Slightly Wonky Robob]