RaiDK, on 21 May 2009, 10:27, said:
Golan, on 21 May 2009, 20:17, said:
RaiDK, on 21 May 2009, 10:06, said:
Next time, please do at least read my posts before insulting me by ignoring my argumentation or dismissing it as irrelevant. Thank you.
I'm re-reading now and I'm still seeing "Aliens shouldn't be in Fallout". You don't think Aliens should be in Fallout because they're not in the spirit of the game, yet others apparently do.
You wouldn't say that an analysis of Fallout's setting, as Dr.Strangelove did too, would qualify as a lil' bit more than a simple "it wasn't there, it shouldn't be there, because I say so"? Sure it's always coming down to saying "Aliens shouldn't be in Fallout" - because that is what I'm trying to argue for.
If you want me to go in depth on anything, just tell me to.
RaiDK, on 21 May 2009, 10:27, said:
Golan, on 21 May 2009, 20:17, said:
RaiDK, on 21 May 2009, 10:06, said:
Why would I want to have the Fallout franchise only to make a game that is not Fallout-ish?

That's bullshit, if I want to create a different game then I do so with a new name and don't stick to some ancient, antiquated franchise restrictions.
What I meant by that is that what you consider to be in the vein of Fallout, others wouldn't. Hence why we're having this discussion now I suppose.
Well then let's have a discussion instead of saying "you're a fanboy so you're WRONG!".
RaiDK, on 21 May 2009, 10:27, said:
Golan, on 21 May 2009, 20:17, said:
RaiDK, on 21 May 2009, 10:06, said:
Quote
I always thought the whole point of playing games was to have fun.
Fun is very subjective. Which is why I was talking about senseless fun - again, please do at least read my posts. Thank you.
Since the Fallout games are pretty well centered around killing things (Yes, and talking your way out of things in some cases, I have played Fallout) it's debatable at which point it becomes 'senseless'. Seems all pretty senseless to me.
Killing in post-apocalyptic world (read: constant struggle for survival) doesn't seem very senseless to me.