963 replies to this topic

[Wizard]

I'd only consider BF:BC2 if you have 3 other friends who you play with often (i.e., 9/10 times). Campaign isn't worth the game alone and MP is much better with a decent squad.

[Chyros]

Wizard, on 23 Dec 2010, 0:34, said:

I'd only consider BF:BC2 if you have 3 other friends who you play with often (i.e., 9/10 times). Campaign isn't worth the game alone and MP is much better with a decent squad.

Yes, indeed. Moreso than most games, BC2 is very dependent on playing it with friends.

[Admiral FCS]

As Chyros and Wizard said, BC2 is heavily team-dependent. One of the main reasons I stopped playing is because of lack of a effective squad, which can sometimes turn the tide alone.

[AllStarZ]

So... why don't we make our own team then?

[Chyros]

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 10:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

Because everyone's already abandoned it?

[Wizard]

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

I am theoretically always up for a game if there are others who fancy playing. Haven't had a decent game on a decent server for a while now though :sadface:

[TheDR]

Chyros, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:44, said:

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 10:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

Because everyone's already abandoned it?

I play it with my mates all the time. I would play it with FS guys if anyone wanted a game but we need to work as a team, none of this running off

Wizard, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:48, said:

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

I am theoretically always up for a game if there are others who fancy playing. Haven't had a decent game on a decent server for a while now though :sadface:

I'd love a game but we would need to be on Skype and one of us would need to be the squad leader (we could rotate the job). In our squad we would need one of each class, every class being as important as each other. We could even have our recon as a sniper, they would just need a good position.

[Wizard]

You know where I am

[Stinger]

Warning: Rant incoming...

So regarding Modern Warfare, Satan, Beezelbub, The Beast, President of Hell - just one of his many aliases - the CEO of Activision, Bobby Kotick, had this to say:

Quote

“Multiplayer has been largely developed by Treyarch,” even in games like Modern Warfare, which were credited to Infinity Ward,” Kotick said. “I don’t think Treyarch got their due for how much they contributed in the production and polish to the multiplayer.”

http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/act...xting/?news=123

Someone put some friggin' duct tape across Mister Kotick's mouth and shut him up. He is trolling everyone who worked and continues to work for Infinity Ward with that statement. And how come he is only saying this now? Wouldn't have anything to do with the Treyhards being the new flavour of the fiscal year, would it?

No, sorry, dickhead, not buying it. Treyarch ripped weapon reload animations, gun stats, and perk and killstreak ideas from Infinity Ward. They used the engine that Infinity Ward upgraded in CoD 4 to develop World at War and Black Ops because they are incapable of doing so on their own with their 250 "strong" studio. Forgetting that little detail, are we?

Gun Game and all that other "new" stuff that Treyarch brought to the franchise was already present in MW2 - MW2 "modders" found a way to unlock it. Perks defining how your character looks? MW2's One Man Army did it first. No originalty whatsoever.

Now I wonder how many more years they can keep this cash cow going?

[Kalo]

Chyros, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:44, said:

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 10:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

Because everyone's already abandoned it?

TheDR, on 23 Dec 2010, 10:15, said:

Chyros, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:44, said:

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 10:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

Because everyone's already abandoned it?

I play it with my mates all the time. I would play it with FS guys if anyone wanted a game but we need to work as a team, none of this running off

Wizard, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:48, said:

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 8:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

I am theoretically always up for a game if there are others who fancy playing. Haven't had a decent game on a decent server for a while now though :sadface:

I'd love a game but we would need to be on Skype and one of us would need to be the squad leader (we could rotate the job). In our squad we would need one of each class, every class being as important as each other. We could even have our recon as a sniper, they would just need a good position.

@Chyros That's not true, I've always kept my offer to play open and so has Dr.Nick.<3.

@TheDr Actually, this isn't always the case, you don't always need one of each class. It's pretty map dependent. But if you gents want a Ventrilo to play on, the offer is always open.

Edited by Kalo, 23 December 2010 - 19:38.

[Admiral FCS]

AllStarZ, on 23 Dec 2010, 0:24, said:

So... why don't we make our own team then?

Wat platform?

PS3 owner BTW.

Edited by Admiral FCS, 30 December 2010 - 03:03.

[Alias]

Almost everyone here will be PC players.

[Zhao]

Im a xbox360 owner

[-=ViCtOr=-]

Xbox Owner here!

This game sucks on sóóóóó many levels except from NAZI Zombies!
I also kinda liked the Campaign...