37 replies to this topic

[CJ]

Damn, Dauth should be the one to wear the Angry Marine title instaed of Wizard, he's always raging and complaining

[SquigPie]

He'd feel home at /v/ or /tg/. Those guys thrive on RAGE.

Anyway. To answer your question, Dauth. I don't know about other people, but to me, a sig is...An expression, something that shows abit about yourself, kinda like avatars. I can see why MEGALARGE sigs get annoying as hell after a while, I completely agree with you on that.

Edited by SquigPie, 27 March 2011 - 19:48.

[Dauth]

 CJ, on 27 Mar 2011, 19:45, said:

Damn, Dauth should be the one to wear the Angry Marine title instaed of Wizard, he's always raging and complaining

You forget I was an admin once, I know how FS works (to a greater or lesser extent) and as such I generally expect the best out of people.

[SquigPie]

 Dauth, on 27 Mar 2011, 21:52, said:

 CJ, on 27 Mar 2011, 19:45, said:

Damn, Dauth should be the one to wear the Angry Marine title instaed of Wizard, he's always raging and complaining

You forget I was an admin once, I know how FS works (to a greater or lesser extent) and as such I generally expect the best out of people.

Or maybe because admins are a bunch of angry elitist gits

[Dutchygamer]

Even though I don't really care about the increase here, I still want my signatures to be compatible with other forums, so they won't be bigger

[Dauth]

I should also point out, its not anger. FS isn't a big enough part of my life to make me angry now. Its mainly disappointment.

[Chyros]

Tbh it also vexes me. I don't usually use the whole screen for FS but the upper half because a movie plays in the lower half whenever I am at home.

Edited by Chyros, 28 March 2011 - 19:49.

[SquigPie]

 Dauth, on 28 Mar 2011, 20:08, said:

I should also point out, its not anger. FS isn't a big enough part of my life to make me angry now. Its mainly disappointment.

This isn't a school class or a bunch of army rookies, this is an internet forum(s). I'm sorry that we disappoint you, but we are after all, just people sharing stuff and talking/writing.

And if large pimped up sigs is all it takes to make you disappointed then...well, then what?

Edited by SquigPie, 28 March 2011 - 19:51.

[TheDR]

SquigPie, please stop taking it personally, Dauth is just expressing his opinion.

[SquigPie]

I am stating my opinion on the current subject. I have every right to do so.

And no, I'm not taking it personally

Edited by SquigPie, 28 March 2011 - 20:04.

[BeefJeRKy]

Yeah but your tone is somewhat provocative. It's almost as if you're looking for a response from Dauth. I know you're not being serious, so please lay off.

[SquigPie]

I AM being serious.

No, I am not trolling, I'm just provocative by nature.

EDIT: Damnit! Missed my 1000th post :(

Edited by SquigPie, 28 March 2011 - 20:39.

[Golan]

 Wizard, on 27 Mar 2011, 15:27, said:

There is no facility to turn off the user description text without actually turning it off entirely. At this stage I am particularly loathe to go looking for and install an addon for something that has been a feature for donkeys years and is no worse than the signatures we've had for ages.

It's both playing together though that makes it all look bloated. Signatures grow and in return the side panel grows, which allows signatures to grow again, then avatars, then sigs again, then the side panel...
Now, shutting down one doesn't do much as the other will force a certain post height. With so many people just writing one-liners, it's really quite irritating how much space is wasted. Yet the only thing that can be toggled off in the side panel is avatars, but if I'd had to decide between random messages or individual visual identifiers, Avatars win every day - only I can't choose.

 SquigPie, on 28 Mar 2011, 19:47, said:

This isn't a school class or a bunch of army rookies, this is an internet forum(s). I'm sorry that we disappoint you, but we are after all, just people sharing stuff and talking/writing.

More like sigging with the current sig/text ratio.