Jump to content


Best Chopper and tank


72 replies to this topic

#26 Foxhound

    Ain't no rest for the wicked.

  • Gold Member
  • 2027 posts

Posted 07 June 2006 - 05:33

Helicopter: MI-35 Gunship.
Tank: Abrams. though the Challanger 2, Leopard, and T-80 (I think) come close, that Abrams is one tough SOB.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image

#27 Kris

    <Custom title available>

  • Project Team
  • 3825 posts

Posted 07 June 2006 - 17:59

Tanks: Every goddamn German tanks in WWII, They were ahead of there time back then :wtf:

Heli: NONE (muahahaha)







#28 General

    Insufficient Title

  • Member Test
  • 3869 posts

Posted 07 June 2006 - 18:45

Those things :wtf:

Posted Image

Posted Image

#29 Foxhound

    Ain't no rest for the wicked.

  • Gold Member
  • 2027 posts

Posted 07 June 2006 - 21:33

exactly, general
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image

#30 Sgt. Nuker

    Greenskin Inside

  • Global Moderator
  • 13457 posts
  • Projects: Shoot. Chop. Smash. Stomp.

Posted 07 June 2006 - 23:35

Tank: Merkava Mk. III/IV This tank deserves a little more recognition, and the IDF have given it some pretty slick innovations, not to mention it looks pretty sweet.

Helicopter: Mi-24 Hind. Not because everyone else is saying it's the best, but because it can do multiple things, and do those things well. It's a true gunship, and it's awesome to look at.


Regards,

Major Nuker
Posted Image

#31 DerKrieger

    Hillbilly Gun Nut

  • Member
  • 1758 posts

Posted 09 June 2006 - 18:24

Tank:
WWII:
T-34/85
PzKpW VI Panther
Modern:
M1A2 Abrams (fast and powerful)
Leopard 2A6
T-80UM-2 Black Eagle
Merkava
Attack Helicopter:
AH-64D Apache Longbow
Mi-24D Hind
Ka-52 Werewolf

Edited by Gen. Patton, 09 June 2006 - 19:06.

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."-- George S. Patton
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

#32 Sic

    Veteran

  • Project Team
  • 5507 posts
  • Projects: NLS 2D Artist, Code 13 Cameo Artist

Posted 14 June 2006 - 20:10

Commanche apache are good choppers, and i don't know about tanks.
Posted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image

#33 AllStarZ

    Pretentious Prick

  • Member
  • 7083 posts
  • Projects: Pricking around Pretentiously

Posted 14 June 2006 - 21:39

Yayo01, on 7 Jun 2006, 13:59, said:

Tanks: Every goddamn German tanks in WWII, They were ahead of there time back then :P
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Not really. In fact German armour was always inferior to those of other major nations in the early years of WWII. Its only till they introduced the Panther and the Tiger as well as super heavy armoured vehicles that they really had superiority in armour.

They won their great early victories because of Blitzkrieg.

Edited by AllStarZ, 14 June 2006 - 21:40.


#34 Crush3r

    Veteran

  • Member
  • 438 posts

Posted 18 June 2006 - 11:41

Tanks:
WWII:
German: Panzer VII King Tiger - The Overlord of WWII
Allies: Churchill Mk III - It's last incarnation proved to be effective
Soviet: T-34 - Mass produced & effective
Overall: Panzer VIII

Modern:
US: M1A2 Abrams - Fast, good weaponry and overheats like no othe in the desert
Russian: T90 - The latest in the T series is it's best
Europe: Leopard 2 - Fast, powerful and easy to drive
Middle East: Merkava II - High survivability rate
Overall: Leopard 2

Greatest Tank Of All Time: Leopard 2

Heli's:
US: AH-64D Apache
Russian: Mi-24D Hind

Greatest Heli Of All Time: Mi-24D

Greatest Weapon Of All Time: The Human Mind

#35 Mr. Mylo

    The Transporter

  • Project Team
  • 2334 posts
  • Projects: CnC Unleashed; CnC The Rise of the Reds

Posted 18 June 2006 - 12:37

tank: leopard2

chopper: PAH-2 Tiger
Posted Image
sig by the_Dr - you are the best
Posted Image
here look at my artwork: KLICK ME
Posted Image

#36 Moosy Crisp

    GHERUG!

  • Banned
  • 1529 posts

Posted 18 June 2006 - 20:58

Yayo01, on 7 Jun 2006, 11:59, said:

Tanks: Every goddamn German tanks in WWII, They were ahead of there time back then :lol:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I believe the Ruskies kicked their asses with the T-27 or 72 I can't remember the name but they owned all.

#37 Whitey

    <Custom title available>

  • Member
  • 8743 posts

Posted 18 June 2006 - 21:19

72? :lol: wrong era my friend.

#38 Moosy Crisp

    GHERUG!

  • Banned
  • 1529 posts

Posted 19 June 2006 - 00:03

Like I said, it had a T in front of it but I can't remember exactly, so nanner nanner boo boo. Oh, it hit me, It's a T-32!

#39 AllStarZ

    Pretentious Prick

  • Member
  • 7083 posts
  • Projects: Pricking around Pretentiously

Posted 19 June 2006 - 00:59

The overall best tank of World War II must be the T-34, no question about it. It had a clean balance between speed, firepower, and protection, as well as a reliability record and ruggedness that beat the hell out of any German tank, period.

Balance is important in tanks. Think about it this way:

If you had a tank which emphasized armour and firepower, then it would be a sitting duck for aircraft, expensive and difficult to produce, as well as not there when you need it, as it would keep breaking down, and have limited fuel range and speed due to its weight. (As with the Jagdtiger, King Tiger, and Tiger tanks).

If you had a tank which emphasized speed and firepower, then it would be able to take out a ton of tanks, but would ultimately get its ass kicked because as fast as a tank can be, it isn't faster than a tank shell (The best example is the Hellcat)

If it plain emphasized speed, it would dart around before someone puts a big fat tank shell in its turret to stop it (A13 Cruiser).

If you had a tank which emphasized armour, then its armament would be completely ineffective at longer ranges against most tanks, and would therefore have to go closer to deal damage and therefore nullify the advantages in armor. (as happened with the British Matilda II). Same would go if it emphasized speed as well.

If it simply emphasized armour, then it would be nothing more than a mobile lead weight, barely able to do anything.

Moosy Crisp!, on 18 Jun 2006, 20:03, said:

Like I said, it had a T in front of it but I can't remember exactly, so nanner nanner boo boo. Oh, it hit me, It's a T-32!
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

And no, you still fail. Its T-34.

Edited by AllStarZ, 19 June 2006 - 01:00.


#40 DEATH584

    Professional

  • Member
  • 381 posts

Posted 22 June 2006 - 22:35

Tank: Leopard 2

Heli: Apache


I don't see why poeple like the mi-24 so much, the afgans wiped the floor with that thing. Plus its so big that it dosnt even seem practical in modern warfare.

Urban combat + stinger = dead mi-24.

#41 AllStarZ

    Pretentious Prick

  • Member
  • 7083 posts
  • Projects: Pricking around Pretentiously

Posted 22 June 2006 - 22:37

DEATH584, on 22 Jun 2006, 18:35, said:

I don't see why poeple like the mi-24 so much, the afgans wiped the floor with that thing. Plus its so big that it dosnt even seem practical in modern warfare.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It's heavily armed, armored, and can carry troops. Think Apache but less high-tech, bigger, and mixed with a huey.

#42 DEATH584

    Professional

  • Member
  • 381 posts

Posted 22 June 2006 - 22:57

I under stand that, but if you lose one to some wise ass with a stinger and its like, "OMG I just lost my huge expensive choper to an inexpenive stinger missile."
And as history has shown us, this choper is no match for USA backed gurrilas.

#43 AllStarZ

    Pretentious Prick

  • Member
  • 7083 posts
  • Projects: Pricking around Pretentiously

Posted 22 June 2006 - 23:06

No, the Taliban could've handled them on their own.

Besides, you backed South Vietnamese and French guerilla soldiers, and they failed miserably.

Edited by AllStarZ, 22 June 2006 - 23:07.


#44 DEATH584

    Professional

  • Member
  • 381 posts

Posted 23 June 2006 - 02:14

Dosn't matter, your still insulting the mi-24. But any way the French were doomed to lose and if the US really wanted to win in veitnam(as in the public) they could have.

#45 AllStarZ

    Pretentious Prick

  • Member
  • 7083 posts
  • Projects: Pricking around Pretentiously

Posted 23 June 2006 - 02:31

The thing is that they didn't. And the FFI in WWII failed too.

Edited by AllStarZ, 23 June 2006 - 02:32.


#46 Alie

    I want to Poop, Back and Forth. Forever

  • Member
  • 643 posts

Posted 23 June 2006 - 05:53

i don't realy check up on modern military technology but meh

tank : M1A1 Abrams since I guess it's reliable(please remember that i have limated knowledge about military)
helicopter: Hokum : thoush, i never seen it in action, it looks like it could kick some major arse =)
Posted Image

#47 IDF Godzilla

    No more a HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT!!!

  • Member
  • 558 posts

Posted 28 June 2006 - 18:11

People forget that the T-90 is just another T-72 upgrade...
Its basicly the same tank, with new turret armour and thats it.

I don't like to arange "best of" by modern/old.

Best tank, by all times: T-34
Best hely: Hind
Posted Image
Thanks 'try
--------------------
MSN: yboy_man@walla.co.il
ICQ: 321188691[/color]

#48 AllStarZ

    Pretentious Prick

  • Member
  • 7083 posts
  • Projects: Pricking around Pretentiously

Posted 28 June 2006 - 20:38

What makes a weapon great, is versatility, just as an FYI.

#49 Tirak

    Casual

  • Member
  • 85 posts

Posted 02 July 2006 - 01:33

Helicopter: Apache Longbow
Tank: Abrams

#50 smooder

    America's Rage Leader

  • Member
  • 1870 posts
  • Projects: Americas Rage

Posted 03 July 2006 - 18:06

Airete Tank

Posted Image

Centauro Tank Destroyer

Posted Image

Dardo APC

Posted Image

Eurofighter Typhoon (best thing ever!)

Posted Image


Agusta A129 Mangusta Helibopter

Posted Image



NHI NH90 Transport Helibopter

Posted Image


Harrier Jet- Its cooooool

Posted Image




That pretty much sums it allll up



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users