CJ, on 09 April 2013 - 15:01, said:
General, on 09 April 2013 - 06:12, said:
CJ, on 09 April 2013 - 05:53, said:
Krieger22, on 08 April 2013 - 12:26, said:
General, on 08 April 2013 - 12:14, said:
10 children and 2 woman bombarded by NATO plane, not a single fuck given. ( with all due respect attached ) an old fart British pm dies, it covers half of the page even in my country which have nothing to do with her...
Fucks were given here. Interestingly the 7 killed Taliban don't count
TBH, I don't get all this bullshit about killing women and children being different from killing men, all are human, and all are equal. Does that mean every man who was killed by that bombing was, without any doubt, a Taliban terrorist?
No of course there is doubts, this is why I hate bombing an entire street for the sake of a few possible terrorists, there is special ops units for a reason, and wtf they are doing if not involved in such take offs anyway ?
In other cases you may be right, but in this case thing is a bit different. Their husband and childrens' father probably a member of terror group, Taliban or Al Qaeda, but that doesn't make them guilty. This is why we don't give a shit if " man " of Al Qaeda dies.
It's not the bombing I'm talking about. I'm just saying that killing a man is no different than killing a woman or a child, no matter the situation.
AFAIK, women are capable of doing the same things than men, yet for some reason there's still this notion of "all men are evil, all women are innocent".
And I am saying, its like % 99 of Al Qaeda members are man, I don't say %100 because even though it is rare, they sometimes use woman as suicide bombers, but we can never know that truly since idiot divided into his/her atoms and only his/her footage with burka left...
And if we go with statistics, history have seen a lot more evil man than woman
And of course that doesn't make all womans innocent or all man evil but still woman tend to be more docile than her rageful partners
Edited by General, 09 April 2013 - 17:01.