warbz's visuals
#76
Posted 31 January 2007 - 14:45
with the third one i was trying to get an eery feel to it.
thx for comments i will try to add another element to the third one if i can think of something relevant to add to it.
#77
Posted 02 March 2007 - 22:09
i thought i would get back on ps for a bit today
#78
Posted 03 March 2007 - 04:12
For starters, I think it would be really cool if the text could have a ghost image of the NOD logo behind it (in the negative space between the lines).
Secondly, and lastly, the NOD logo being blackened out on the right hand corner isn't as flowing as it could be. It would look better if it was burned out of existance gradually, rather than all at once like it is.
My best,
Nuker
#79
Posted 03 March 2007 - 04:56
- E.V.E.
#80
Posted 03 March 2007 - 08:54
#81
Posted 15 March 2007 - 20:07
plain yet classy:
one of my previous ones improved:
Edited by Warbz, 29 March 2007 - 21:40.
#82
Posted 16 March 2007 - 08:51
Maybe a bit more could be done with the border. Other than that, I like it .
The Crazykenny one is nice. Much too large for a sig, but just as imagine it is nice.
The simplicity in the second one I like.
#83
Posted 16 March 2007 - 19:32
the third one the top right isnt actually an image apart from the few pixels i forgot to remove, its a PNG file so i dont no why u see it as a diff blue.
#84
Posted 17 March 2007 - 16:56
#85
Posted 17 March 2007 - 21:04
no offence blat.
#86
Posted 17 March 2007 - 21:55
Warbz, on 15 Mar 2007, 16:07, said:
plain yet classy:
one of my previous ones improved:
To the first one, although I absolutely adore the nuclear theme, it is far too large to be a sig. Maybe if you scaled it down, and gave it some kind of appropriate border it would be as Austin Powers says "dead sexy".
The second one does have a classic and simplistic feel to it, which is sometimes all you need. Something simple can say much more than something fancy. While the font isn't a bad choice, personally I'd use something a bit more elegant, or one that looks like caligraphy.
Last, but not least, your updated NOD sig. The NOD logo, although it belongs to the pruposed "bad guys", does deserve to be seen as a whole. The torn off corner technique is good, but because of its location, sort of detracts from the sig because part of the logo was torn off.
In order of appearance:
8.5/10
9/10
8/10
My best,
Nuker
#87
Posted 18 March 2007 - 13:52
but as i said the nuke pic isnt s'possed to be a sig.
i just made it cos i was bored
im well chuffed with this one.
#89
Posted 18 March 2007 - 14:10
thens i added a bit of blur and lens flare etc.
#90
Posted 18 March 2007 - 14:36
- E.V.E.
#91
Posted 18 March 2007 - 14:44
i was quite surprised how well i managed to blend the images into each other
#92
Posted 19 March 2007 - 15:45
My best,
Nuker
#93
Posted 20 March 2007 - 22:10
#94
Posted 26 March 2007 - 21:11
a hover tank i made.
my 3rd attempt at 3ds max.
most of u saw my 1st and my 2nd got lost (virus :( )
i see no-one cared about my last post. :(
Edited by Warbz, 26 March 2007 - 21:12.
#95
Posted 26 March 2007 - 21:14
Looks nice nonetheless. I suggest making the chassis more realistic though. But, the barrel is awesome.
#96
Posted 26 March 2007 - 21:21
current poly's= just over 3000. i think cnc3 units can have over 4000... i think
#97
Posted 27 March 2007 - 17:35
tank render
ever seen the film 300?
well this was like that.
all the units below plus some archers that legged it b4 the the 1st wave of attacks.
the stats:
Edited by Warbz, 27 March 2007 - 17:36.
#98
Posted 27 March 2007 - 18:43
anyway the tank looks great
#99
Posted 28 March 2007 - 21:17
#100
Posted 29 March 2007 - 20:51
anyway
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users