Jump to content


What we Know thus far.


38 replies to this topic

#26 Alias

    Member Title Goes Here

  • Member
  • 11705 posts

Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:04

View PostGolan, on 3 Mar 2007, 22:45, said:

Have a look at buildings beeing repaired. You can clearly see the debris flying back on its position when the animation is played backwards as soon as damage-states shift. :P

Hahaha. Matrix style.

Posted Image

#27 Indigo

    Professional

  • Member
  • 352 posts
  • Projects: Ripping-off Counstrike1.6 player models for GenZH infantry.

Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:35

Debris flying back, gross
Posted Image

...and I don't know what to do...'cause I'll never be with you...

#28 Sgt. Rho

    Kerbal Rocket Scientist

  • Project Leader
  • 6870 posts
  • Projects: Scaring Jebediah.

Posted 04 March 2007 - 18:51

if i see it properly, there is a firestorm wall?

#29 Chrizz

    E-Studios™ 2012

  • Gold Member
  • 2012 posts
  • Projects: C&C3: Tiberium Icestorm

Posted 06 March 2007 - 23:40

Dunno but the firestorm technic whas used of tiber crystals and that shit whas from scrin.

yes the walls u see are from the Scrin / Aliens dunno what EA they call its more Scrin but nvm.

seems they use the Firestormwall Technic for there walls :)

#30 Kris

    <Custom title available>

  • Project Team
  • 3825 posts

Posted 07 March 2007 - 07:37

View PostGolan, on 3 Mar 2007, 21:45, said:

Have a look at buildings beeing repaired. You can clearly see the debris flying back on its position when the animation is played backwards as soon as damage-states shift. :D



EA sucks :) , They got a working Demolishion system In Generals and an awesome version of it in the BFME Series, But in C&C 3...They fucked up :)

Edited by Chris, 07 March 2007 - 15:54.








#31 Chrizz

    E-Studios™ 2012

  • Gold Member
  • 2012 posts
  • Projects: C&C3: Tiberium Icestorm

Posted 07 March 2007 - 12:11

its still a demo it may fixed in final build.

and if ya dont like the style and balance u can mod the game thats why EA is release ng a kit

#32 Judgement

    Demon of the Fall

  • Member
  • 2330 posts
  • Projects: Same old shit different pile.

Posted 08 March 2007 - 23:40

OH THANK YOU CHRIZZ!!! I always figure the vehicles couldnt be more than 1500 from the initial screenshots. I just hope they dont do a dramatic change to gameplay or look or anything in CNC3 when it hits store shelves like they did with Generals.
Posted Image
Posted Image

#33 Sgt. Rho

    Kerbal Rocket Scientist

  • Project Leader
  • 6870 posts
  • Projects: Scaring Jebediah.

Posted 24 August 2007 - 05:24

A few things I discovered while going through the SampleArts.zip:

-WW Skin modifiers still work.
-Turrets and Turretels, and so Barrels and more can be controlled via WW skin (so it shall be possible to make a soldier which actually can aim any high with its gun, and that without any Animation nor "ripping of his arms".
-Some models use skins from other unit too. For example, the Predator: When upgraded with Railguns, the predator Railgun uses the texture of the mammoth tank.
-Infantry can be very detailed. The Zonetroopers even have hands,
-Sub units (Like the invader aircrafts from the PACs) are parts of the main unit.
-The XML files are VERY similar to the Generals/BFME INI files.
-Indeed, w3x-format models.
-Housecolors work via alpha channels.
-Limited turret rotation angles are possible.
-The Avatar Comandeer ability is about a hundert lines long.
-For some reason, tanks have 2-3 threads, one over an other.

#34 ☆FreedoM_FighteR☆

    ☆I FighT For FreeDoM☆

  • Member
  • 1887 posts
  • Projects: C&C Renovatio

Posted 16 September 2007 - 08:20

some one know if navel units pussibal?

Posted Image
Posted Image

Dauth edit: One on top of the other or it breaks sig rules

#35 CodeCat

    It's a trap!

  • Gold Member
  • 6111 posts

Posted 16 September 2007 - 11:07

As far as I can see they are.

First of all, the ship locomotors must use Surfaces="WATER DEEP_WATER". Not sure what the difference between those is, but using them makes sense. Perhaps DEEP_WATER alone would work better.

Secondly, you need to find a way to build shipyards on water. The trick here is to make sure the spawn point of the objects it builds is on water, so that the units exit the building on the water. One possible way is to simply spread 'tech shipyards' around the edges of the water, for everyone to capture and use. But with C&C3's new 'build-on-existing-object' logic that the Scrin Growth Accelerator uses (it builds only on a Tiberium field) it's also possible to place various objects on a map, that allow a shipyard to be built on them. Not sure whether it's possible to build on an object despite it being on water, but it's worth a try.
CodeCat

Posted Image
Posted Image

Go dtiomsaítear do chód gan earráidí, is go gcríochnaítear do chláir go réidh. -Old Irish proverb

#36 Alias

    Member Title Goes Here

  • Member
  • 11705 posts

Posted 16 September 2007 - 11:32

I'm guessing WATER is any water location, and DEEP_WATER is Water below point x. I'm guessing they're different to allow both large ships that can't go up shore, and small boats that can.

Posted Image

#37 CodeCat

    It's a trap!

  • Gold Member
  • 6111 posts

Posted 16 September 2007 - 11:38

Well actually, I think it's more useful to distinguish between real ships and amphibious craft. The latter would be able to go on GROUND, WATER and DEEP_WATER, and the former on DEEP_WATER only.
CodeCat

Posted Image
Posted Image

Go dtiomsaítear do chód gan earráidí, is go gcríochnaítear do chláir go réidh. -Old Irish proverb

#38 Slye_Fox

    FOXTec Leader

  • Project Leader
  • 2351 posts
  • Projects: CnC: Condition Red, Sigma Invasion, Armoured Sky: Ethereal Dawn

Posted 16 September 2007 - 11:45

if you can build on top of structures, can't you just have a Civy basepoint on the water which you build your Neval yard onto?
Posted Image

#39 CodeCat

    It's a trap!

  • Gold Member
  • 6111 posts

Posted 16 September 2007 - 11:54

That's what I said. But I'm not sure if it'll work.
CodeCat

Posted Image
Posted Image

Go dtiomsaítear do chód gan earráidí, is go gcríochnaítear do chláir go réidh. -Old Irish proverb



2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users