76 replies to this topic

[ToushirouNL]

LOL! i wonna see the reaper tank in real life

[winterlord]

It kinda makes sense, as in Generals, Chinese forces get massively owned in the opening sequence of almost every mission.
1st mission: Parades gets totaled
2nd mission: 90% of the attack force on the bridge is wiped out
3rd mission: Chinese base is overrun
(i forget these missions)
final mission: Attack force is mostly wiped out

[fjsgdfsdjgbsgkjfg]

ill love to see an overlord in real life with only people with deep voices commanding

Edited by Major Zero, 17 March 2007 - 03:23.

[Shirou]

Just imagine...how NOT feasible that would be

[Kris]

Behold! The Generals MiG !! Which in real life is owned by the Russians!



.....

And heres The Tank we all hated and love! The Chinese battlemaster




AND heres the overpowered when armed with scorpion missiles, The Scorpion Tank!

Edited by Chris, 17 March 2007 - 17:02.

[Razven]

Wow, some nice pictures there. (Let's give the T-82 to the Chinese since it's realism )

[Shirou]

The Missile upgrade is actually what makes scorpions useful...

Anyway, that battlemaster looks so friggin inferior to say, a german Leopard. But hey.. who can blame them inferiors. They need the numbers .

[Kris]

So....In reality, Soviet Russia plays too much Generals because China banned Generals

[Kris]

The Soviets plays too much Generals

And here, we have the soviet microwave tank

[Axel of Sweden]

The Battlemaster is a Type 59 MBT With added armor side skirts




Never seen that before ey?

Can you tell the differnce?


The helix actually comes with a gun, like ZH, but not a bunker ,speaker or miniguns

Chinese version

Hmm, that realy worth a reskin



INSTAL DA RADAR

Hmm thats the cockpit design that EA chosed,

Helix realism mod anyone?



USA Armor division, the crusader tank is real and american, but not a real tank


The paladin is also artillery

The closest to a Generals crusader is the The M8 "Thunderbolt" AGS.



Medium airborne tank meant to replace the Sheridan, im unsure about it,s current status



The F16XL from Shockwawe is also real

Edited by Axel of Sweden, 28 April 2007 - 08:01.

[Strategia]

Battlemaster = T-59 good.
Battlemaster = Ch'onma-ho better. http://upload.wikime...c/c0/Render.png (complete with reactive armour! seriously. ZERO DIFFERENCE!)

Edited by Strategia, 01 May 2007 - 22:20.

[Rumpullpus]

the crusader tank from generals is actually a britsh tank its their version of an abrams

Edited by Rumpullpus, 02 May 2007 - 00:26.

[Axel of Sweden]

The crusader is a mix between, Leopard 2A4 and Abrams basicly

[LCPL Carrow]

Mmmm I think it looks like an Abrams without the machine guns on top. The Crusader looks nothing like the Challenger 2 or the Leopard. It looks like a...M1 Abrams, not the -A1 with the 120mm gun (the in-game model's barrel looks too long and thin to be the new 120mm gun) or the -A2 with the improved optical equipment (the top of the turret has absolutely nothing on it). It doesn't have the M240G machine guns on top, either, which IMO it should, since the Battlemaster gets IT'S machine guns...

But this is why I have to laugh at n00bs that say "OMG ABRAMS OWNZ0RZ PUT IT IN MOD PLZ!" It already is! Play Vanilla for once and you'll see!

And I don't think the Paladin looks anything like the M8, and at any rate, the Paladin is supposed to be the USA heavy tank, and the M8 is a light tank. I think the Paladin is just an EA concept, and think that it would be much better if it were the RL M108 Paladin Self-propelled howitzer

[TehKiller]

Huh id doenst look even 90% Abrams...those noobs want it because its implented in most of the mods

[Jazzie Spurs]

Chris, on 19 Mar 2007, 14:20, said:

The Soviets plays too much Generals

And here, we have the soviet microwave tank

its a rl unit!!!!!!!!!!

[Kris]

LCPL Carrow, on 4 May 2007, 04:56, said:

Mmmm I think it looks like an Abrams without the machine guns on top. The Crusader looks nothing like the Challenger 2 or the Leopard. It looks like a...M1 Abrams, not the -A1 with the 120mm gun (the in-game model's barrel looks too long and thin to be the new 120mm gun) or the -A2 with the improved optical equipment (the top of the turret has absolutely nothing on it). It doesn't have the M240G machine guns on top, either, which IMO it should, since the Battlemaster gets IT'S machine guns...

But this is why I have to laugh at n00bs that say "OMG ABRAMS OWNZ0RZ PUT IT IN MOD PLZ!" It already is! Play Vanilla for once and you'll see!

And I don't think the Paladin looks anything like the M8, and at any rate, the Paladin is supposed to be the USA heavy tank, and the M8 is a light tank. I think the Paladin is just an EA concept, and think that it would be much better if it were the RL M108 Paladin Self-propelled howitzer

The Paladin tank is actually a uber modern M1A2 Abrams, Look at its turret....the front of the turret screams Abrams but the overall look was changed so maybe they trolled the internet and found the paladin's name fitting for the new abrams.

And the Crusader tank is actually a Leopard Tank back in the early days of Generals, The Crusader is a completely different tank back then....Now after EA dumped the original Generals system, They salvaged the leopard and made it the crusader we have today.

The crusader we have today sounds like a real life Leopard tank except the engine sound but the look of the tank is completely different.

[Razven]

I still maintain that the Battlemaster looks old, obsolete and cartoonish. The turret or the gun needs to look smaller.

[LCPL Carrow]

I don't recall if the ShW model for the Crusader is different from the regular ZH model, but the one in ShW looks almost exactly like an M1 Abrams. The Leopard has armor that slopes in on the bottom half of the turret and out on the upper half. The Abrams turret armor just slopes out the entire way, and is (or at least looks, due to the outward armor slope) closer to the hull than the Leopard 2's turret. In addition to the armor slant, the Abrams' turret is longer and covers more of the vehicle than does the Leopard 2's. Also, the Abrams' turret is situated further aft than the Leopard's.

In short, dude, the current Crusader model in ShW looks nothing at all like a Leopard and everything like a dumbed-down Abrams.

The Paladin doesn't look that much like an Abrams, IMO. A little, yeah, but not much.




Thought just occured to me, what if the name really was the M1A2 Crusader instead of the M1A2 Abrams? How much do you think the Islomofacists would like that name?

Agreed on the BM's machine gun. The turret looks rather T-54ish, though, which I'm pretty sure it's supposed to. The BM is a T-54.

Edited by LCPL Carrow, 07 May 2007 - 17:58.

[Kris]

Thats imagination for yah mister

[Razven]

If the M1 were calle Crusaders, then the guys back at Gulf War I would not have been permitted to land them in Kuwait.

0311 <- Rifleman, lol.

[Razven]

Re: Battlemasters

Battlemasters are pretty generic, they might be anywhere between the Type 59/62 to the Type 80/85/88 series. But which one is the most commonly acepted Real Tank that the Battlemaster is referred to?

[LCPL Carrow]

People's Liberation Army, on 8 May 2007, 01:34, said:

If the M1 were calle Crusaders, then the guys back at Gulf War I would not have been permitted to land them in Kuwait.

This is true...Crusaders in the land of the guardians of the two Holy Mosques! *gasp!*

Quote

0311 <- Rifleman, lol.

Huh? I don't get what you were talking about with the Rifleman MOS...like were you referring to me? Mine is 0811 Cannon Crewman, not 0311 Rifleman...

[Judgement]

Im pretty sure that was the point of the Battlemaster. Make it look like it belongs there but dont make it look like an actual weapon so that way no one is offended by China using a SPECIFIC tank.
As for the Crusader, I dont know what EA was smoking when they made it. I personally dont like how it looks. No modern tank would look like that. And in 2010 or whenever ZH is set(i forgot by now), Im pretty sure that there would be better tanks than that(design wise).
At the topic at hand, ya thats a pretty cool find. Most of the things(almost all) is based off real life weapons, only modified and made to fit into the sides. Just like how the Nuke Cannon is reminiscent of the Nuke Shell launching Cannon test they did in Nevada with gun#9 (aka Atomic Annie). And(just found this) maybe inspired by this.

Edited by Judgement, 15 May 2007 - 22:16.

[Rumpullpus]

yea the nuke cannon is a real american arty peice from like back in the 60s. if i remember correctly didnt the USSR build their own nuke cannon too?