

Flood Control
#26
Posted 17 December 2007 - 00:54

#27
Posted 17 December 2007 - 01:26

#28
Posted 17 December 2007 - 02:40
#30
Posted 17 December 2007 - 20:06
#31
Posted 17 December 2007 - 20:12
#32
Posted 17 December 2007 - 20:48
seriously, i haven't heard one real reason to change the current set up other than its "annoying".. just wait a minute... read another thread, watch something on youtube, boil an egg, there are many things that you can do in a minute :-)
#33
Posted 17 December 2007 - 21:10


#34
Posted 17 December 2007 - 21:37
#35
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:00
#36
Posted 18 December 2007 - 14:46
Boidy, on 17 Dec 2007, 21:37, said:
*votes boidy* But to be an american president you need to invent your own words... work on that

How exactly does flood control stop double posting? Surely a double post stoppper like on some forums would be better

anyway 2000 + posts (+ teh smoodar:p) should be okay

Edited by smooder, 18 December 2007 - 14:48.
#37
Posted 18 December 2007 - 18:15
I am merely stating that waiting 1 minute is hardly a bad thing to stop spaming.
We can't make affect people with certain post counts (apart from as stated by potp it may not be possible anyway) but also post count isn't an indication about the maturity of that specific member. For example, look at kacen, he had 2000+ post, which just proves anyone can spam. Similarly you cant go by member group, because project leaders have been banned/warned/demoted in the past, once again proving that member groups don't show maturity.
The only real way of doing this would be to individually decide for each member if they deserve it or not. This would be very very time consuming... and apart from that would cause yet again more tension on the forum. "why has he not got it, and i do!?!"
I still have yet to hear a good reason why it should be lifted anyway... What is wrong with waiting a minute?
Edited by Bob, 18 December 2007 - 18:15.
#38
Posted 18 December 2007 - 20:05
#39
Posted 18 December 2007 - 20:13
If you only have 2 minutes read a thread, then there is no problem, because you have to post once and then the flood control will kick in and no matter how fast you read, you can't read 2 threads and make a considered reply to both all within 2 minutes, flood control or no flood control.
#40
Posted 18 December 2007 - 22:54
#41
Posted 18 December 2007 - 22:59
smooder, on 18 Dec 2007, 8:46, said:
Because when you press the reply button a second time the flood control pops up.
Oh and just a notification: I had to stop myself from insulting you for being a $^#% aswell, stop trying to be happy and witty while pointing out people's flaws. It doesn't work for you.
Edited by Lλmbda, 18 December 2007 - 23:00.
#42
Posted 18 December 2007 - 23:14
Boidy, on 18 Dec 2007, 22:54, said:
Boidy, on 17 Dec 2007, 21:37, said:

#43
Posted 19 December 2007 - 00:34
#44
Posted 19 December 2007 - 10:15
Lλmbda, on 18 Dec 2007, 22:59, said:
smooder, on 18 Dec 2007, 8:46, said:
Because when you press the reply button a second time the flood control pops up.
Oh and just a notification: I had to stop myself from insulting you for being a $^#% aswell, stop trying to be happy and witty while pointing out people's flaws. It doesn't work for you.
I hope you were not talking about me.
I was pointing out something on the board, not insulting anyone. It isnt just me that thinks this.
And if this is something to do with the reason yayo and zeke now hate me stay the fuck out of it.
Also I'm agreeing with Switch. It is fucking annoying.
EDIT: Also a double post blocker would be better than a long flood control? If doubkle posts is what you want to stop?
Edited by smooder, 19 December 2007 - 10:19.
#46
Posted 19 December 2007 - 14:36
Take it as the "life insurance" of the forums. You don't want us to be bombed with constant shock images (yes, it DOES happen and a double-post "blocker" can't fix this). Sure, these occasions may only happen once or twice a year - but without flood control, this would be 10 times the hell it is already for the staff to remove it.
I'd much rather wait a minute to post than open a thread to find a new post that is full of shock images.
My two cents.
~A.

#47
Posted 19 December 2007 - 17:00
#48
#50
Posted 20 December 2007 - 03:09
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users