Enough with the big stuff, the real mind blowers are below the molecular scale.
0
planet sizes
Started By Warbz, Dec 29 2007 19:50
28 replies to this topic
#26
-
- Member
-
- 3831 posts
we dont need i to c
Posted 19 February 2008 - 02:52
Lifes a shit.. deal w/ it..its impossible to have a good day wow fuck this gay earth much??
Ask me questions about audio technical matters or DAWs!
Ask me questions about audio technical matters or DAWs!
#27
-
- Gold Member
-
- 11193 posts
<Custom title available>
Posted 19 February 2008 - 08:27
Quantum mechanics isn't mind blowing, after doing 4 courses in QM I'm quite happy with wavefunctions and operators.
#28
-
- Member
-
- 567 posts
I thought it's a box
-
Projects: Cnc: Untitled
Posted 19 February 2008 - 16:42
What you said, doesn't it only apply to that particular "light emission". We're trying to mess with the age of our universe and the first galaxies are the quasars, which mean we need to measure with their light. And maybe our sources were incorrect, but we were trying to say that our distance measuring has flaws in it, and we want to repair it basically.
Medve
Medve
#29
-
- Gold Member
-
- 11193 posts
<Custom title available>
Posted 19 February 2008 - 17:10
The method described is how we find a lot of distant galaxies, quasars are a pita to age since we don't know their original size or roatation period and how much energy they lose per rotation.
We have about 4 distance measures used in cosmology and each of these has weaknesses, but cosmology while interesting is not my strength.
We have about 4 distance measures used in cosmology and each of these has weaknesses, but cosmology while interesting is not my strength.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
