2198 replies to this topic

[Whitey]

A 1.2? That's just cold mate.

3/10. Below average, I mean its a runescape(?) siggy and a studio banner that I should say needs redoing, though it's not "terrible" it's still bland.

[Dr.Schwarzk0pf]

still 10/10

[Soul]

9/10

[BillyChaka]

I think the "Soul" text on the first banner is kinda hard to read.

7.5/10

[Soul]

10/10

[Whitey]

5/10, first is too rusted looking, second is just too bright. The bob coin and whatnot text is rather bogus, as is the quote and the sloganizer thing. Rather unstructured in appearance.

[Dr.Schwarzk0pf]

still 10/10

[Nexolate]

8/10
Although it contains some nice effects, especially with the Inner Glow, the Sig feels very void and empty.
I can see there's a very light background, but that doesn't cut it for me personally.

8.5/10
Better, again making use of nice blending effects to stream the renders together.
Again, brought down by the same reason stated above.

[Vaughan]

5/10.. Same old' same old'. Same technique, same look, there's just nothing exciting about it.

~V.

[BillyChaka]

8/10

O.O

[Nexolate]

@Vaughan: Cold, considering the ammount of time and effort it takes to get such just right.

7.5/10.

For something not using brushes, it's quite impressive.
The Fade on the Right-Side corresponds with the arrow.
Not to mention the Render is pretty "woop-ass".

The only things I can criticise are the Background and Border.
Both are a bit simple for my taste, but I acknowledge that it suits the Sig more.

A well made Sig, but not really my style.

EDIT: Billy stole my post! =O

Edited by Nexolate, 18 July 2007 - 15:49.

[Strategia]

8/10. Cool gun, nice quote

[Vaughan]

6.5/10 for the ShW sig. It's not too complex, but it has that "Fun" feel to it.

@ Skillz

That's all I have to say, I won't change my bias on an account of how hard the individual worked/spent time on the given signature.. I don't rate like that. I rate on what I see.

OT:

+-->

A 1.2? That's just cold mate.[/quote]

Never call people "Mate" unless you're from Australia. xD


In good manner,

~V.

-Tha' rewf iz awn fiyah-

• Back to top

[Strategia]

8.5/10. Stylish, compact, nice.

Quote

QUOTE(Whatever the **** your bloody name is )

XD

[Nexolate]

7/10
A nice modification to an existing Sig.
Could do with a Border and some better effects, but it's still nice.

EDIT: Updated my Sig. More Red, Shorter/Better Quote.

[BillyChaka]

All of your sigs seem to... blend together. In a bad way.

7/10

[Vaughan]

Quote

All of your sigs seem to... blend together. In a bad way.

Yes, that's exactly it! They all seem the same.. :|

Anyways,

7/10, I could just use without the graininess..

~V.

[VertiGo-]

8/10...
i thought it was a monkey

[Jazzie Spurs]

Nice background The soldier blends with the background also the logo too but u use the shape in oder sig (nice shape btw) so i geve you a 9.5/10

[Nexolate]

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

7.5/10
An interesting take on the vBubble. Round is new, but the glow effects seem kind of 'wobbly'.
Again, the render doesn't really blend with the BG but I like the choice of font and Bullet-Hole.

[Vaughan]

^ Woah now, vBubble? Teh "v" is 4 Vaughan.

Quote

8/10...
i thought it was a monkey

It is a monkey, silly!

Anyways, same ratnks on Skillz' sig.

~V.

[Nexolate]

6.5/10
A unique look that's just not fresh anymore.
Glow, Bevel and Blur effects are simplistic and unappealing.

The render doesn't really blend with the background, which is very bleak and empty, at all.
Them font is default with Drop Shadow and Bevel, again simple effects.

It begins with an H and it's what you should have thought about before talking about "Same old'".

Edited by Nexolate, 19 July 2007 - 09:30.

[Dr.Schwarzk0pf]

9/10

[Jazzie Spurs]

first, 10/10 nice vector art
second, 10/10
nice girl and good brushes

[Vaughan]

6.9/10, Not my cup o' tea, but you're improving.