

Aftermath of the battle of Kurmuk!!!
#26
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:03

#27
Posted 01 February 2009 - 13:02
Massey, on 1 Feb 2009, 20:58, said:

Next time I'd suggest you make the remaining insignia ('marks' are something you get on a test) actually at a high enough resolution to be discerned from the rest of the unit. The one on the Supply Wartruck door is so ridiculously blurry if you didn't know it was already there you'd never pick it as one, and relying on poor image quality to test people's observation skills is something of a cop-out.
Quote


#28
Posted 01 February 2009 - 16:19
FiReFTW, on 1 Feb 2009, 12:03, said:
Those aren't exactly the kind words of encouragement now, are they?
How would you feel after spending x amount of time creating something to receive a comment like that?
Just think about that for a second, please.
Not very nice, is it?
#30
Posted 01 February 2009 - 16:42
CommanderJB, on 1 Feb 2009, 17:49, said:
Also, moved to Writings as it has little relevance to mod news, questions or information; Red Storm was in Writings, and so shall this be too.
well....
Let me first start with. Any base any nation around the world has a perimeter. Thats a given.
to quote the lore...
"The Russians, unknown to the newly titled Pacific Peace Alliance had intercepted intelligence relating to the planned attack. Once every technician and scientist was evacuated, Colonel Rostov informed his troops that the base should be held at all costs."
these just a few points, i want to make clear. Why i sead what i sead.
1. the word "Relating" makes you think. Did the Russians get a genaral China and US attack plan or US focus only attak plan or China focus only attack plan?
2. Col. Rostov telling his man, the base should be held at all costs.
makes you think if he did get word of the US attack (or attack on 2 sides) he would of put a much stronger defence. I know ur thinking he needed all hes troop at the south but he had tanks siting at the southeast of the base. (i might add got destroyed, with a few others doing nothing)
3. He had a HUGE defence at the south. So it makes you think the "intercepted intelligence relating to the planned attack" was about the China attack plan
well all of this is realy comes down to IMO but hey i had fun making it! ^.^ if u still think im wrong about this i will remove it! FREE OF CHARGE!
oh i was hoping (but i understand why u put there) can you move it back to RotR fourm plz. if not, all good! ^.^
i might add JB wins and gets to be asign to the field!!! congratz!
Edited by Massey, 01 February 2009 - 17:09.
#31
Posted 01 February 2009 - 18:09
Massey, on 1 Feb 2009, 17:42, said:
Please calm down my friend.
I did have a big smile the time i read your story.
Like Stinger already said "Well done, Massey. I am sure the Dev Team find it endearing to see they have such dedicated fans".
I like to say the same.
Best regards.
Wi-Ta
Edited by wi-ta, 01 February 2009 - 18:10.
#32
Posted 01 February 2009 - 19:01
on a other note i updated the grammer alittle and if these any thing else that needs updating, plz tell me and ill fix it! ^.^
still waiting to see what Comr4de thinks
a few post back i sead "all that hard work reading maps, back story and RotR manual and u dont believe i did it :( i have FAIL ='("
i might add to that i did a little reaseach for the correct ranks of each army.
Edited by Massey, 01 February 2009 - 19:12.
#34
Posted 01 February 2009 - 19:53
#35
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:06
Stinger, on 1 Feb 2009, 17:19, said:
FiReFTW, on 1 Feb 2009, 12:03, said:
Those aren't exactly the kind words of encouragement now, are they?
How would you feel after spending x amount of time creating something to receive a comment like that?
Just think about that for a second, please.
Not very nice, is it?
I don't mind him doing this ,fine its a nice gesture , the thing is he is doing things like this for the past 2 months non stop , opening threads that have no real meaning , writting 10 pages of something all the time , and quite frankly its a bit annoying and im wondering if he has no other more important thing too do than write on a forum all day long?

#36
Posted 01 February 2009 - 21:38
Quote
Every member has the right to say what he thinks. You should respect other peoples' views, no matter how much you might disagree with them. Posts that are clearly inflammatory or aggressive in nature are not allowed however. Respect goes both ways. You show us your respect, and we will return the gesture.
#37
Posted 01 February 2009 - 23:03
Nice little thing man, If you get better, I'm sure the ROTR Team could use an extra writer

Good Stuff!
Edited by Sobek, 01 February 2009 - 23:03.
#38
Posted 01 February 2009 - 23:30
Sobek, on 1 Feb 2009, 23:03, said:
Nice little thing man, If you get better, I'm sure the ROTR Team could use an extra writer

Good Stuff!
Tbh, with OD and Dauth, with JB and Kirkov backing them up if it all goes utterly pearshaped, the ROTR team has undoubtedly got the forum's finest creative minds behind it's writing already.
Nonetheless, while a little... lengthy/fanboyish... for my tastes, impressive to see you spend so much time dedicated to a single project Massey. Nice stuff

Edited by AJ, 01 February 2009 - 23:30.
#39
Posted 01 February 2009 - 23:38
#40
Posted 02 February 2009 - 00:35
Massey, on 1 Feb 2009, 9:50, said:
Papaya Master Rai, on 1 Feb 2009, 19:33, said:
NergiZed, on 1 Feb 2009, 15:45, said:
Papaya Master Rai, on 1 Feb 2009, 5:32, said:
Ja, after I actually read the piece, I honestly couldn't beleive that Massey wrote it; I was fairly impressed.
I hope he writes like this more. Well... I hope he writes in the fashion, but with more brevity in coloquial posts.
Come to think of it you're right about that. Massey did drastically improved in his grammar and made an excellent story about ROTR and you really can not believe that he actually wrote it...that's how good he is in writing this exotic story.
@CommanderJB: Oh and CommanderJB don't forget to tell Massey about capitalizing the word I.

when i wrote this i was going to bring them out in a 3 part story. but after doing China and US (with spellcheck being my friend) and did Russia in a rush (without spell check) i just put it al together for the hell of it! (Q TRUMPETS! hehe)
all that hard work reading maps, back story and RotR manual and u dont believe i did it :( i have FAIL ='(
Combining them into one post was a great decision on your part. Because I can guarentee that they would've been combined by the mods afterrwards.
#42
Posted 02 February 2009 - 02:47
I wish people would stop putting emphasis on claiming he has too much time and putting more on how great of a job he did..

#43
Posted 02 February 2009 - 03:50
Pav3d, on 2 Feb 2009, 3:41, said:

Massey, on 2 Feb 2009, 3:42, said:
CommanderJB, on 1 Feb 2009, 17:49, said:
Also, moved to Writings as it has little relevance to mod news, questions or information; Red Storm was in Writings, and so shall this be too.
well....
Let me first start with. Any base any nation around the world has a perimeter. Thats a given.
to quote the lore...
"The Russians, unknown to the newly titled Pacific Peace Alliance had intercepted intelligence relating to the planned attack. Once every technician and scientist was evacuated, Colonel Rostov informed his troops that the base should be held at all costs."
these just a few points, i want to make clear. Why i sead what i sead.
1. the word "Relating" makes you think. Did the Russians get a genaral China and US attack plan or US focus only attak plan or China focus only attack plan?
2. Col. Rostov telling his man, the base should be held at all costs.
makes you think if he did get word of the US attack (or attack on 2 sides) he would of put a much stronger defence. I know ur thinking he needed all hes troop at the south but he had tanks siting at the southeast of the base. (i might add got destroyed, with a few others doing nothing)
3. He had a HUGE defence at the south. So it makes you think the "intercepted intelligence relating to the planned attack" was about the China attack plan
well all of this is realy comes down to IMO but hey i had fun making it! ^.^ if u still think im wrong about this i will remove it! FREE OF CHARGE!
oh i was hoping (but i understand why u put there) can you move it back to RotR fourm plz. if not, all good! ^.^
i might add JB wins and gets to be asign to the field!!! congratz!
You don't need to remove it as this is simply your work and the lack of exact clarity in the original document makes it into a case of my opinion versus yours, where you have every right to believe what you wish. I am simply stating why I believe otherwise.
And no, it will not be moved back to the Rise of the Reds forum as it is not official Rise of the Reds content, rather a piece of original writing which is based in the Rise of the Reds universe the same as General Kirkov's Red Storm (which you may like to check out).
Edited by CommanderJB, 02 February 2009 - 03:53.
Quote


#44
Posted 02 February 2009 - 16:25
i want to make this 99.99999999 close to lore as posable. (上校 梅西 Colonel-Massey breaks the 100% :( )
So i will up date it as soon as i get some time to do so!
#45
Posted 03 February 2009 - 00:29
Anyways, this is pretty good, I like it.
#46
Posted 03 February 2009 - 02:30
but the 梅西上校 is not the same as 上校 梅西
my one means in Chinese (Colonel-Massi )
(there no realy derect tranlation for massey :( )
your one means in Chinese (Colonel Lionel Messi)
Edited by Massey, 03 February 2009 - 02:52.
#47
Posted 03 February 2009 - 04:04
Massey, on 2 Feb 2009, 18:30, said:
2.上校 梅西
1's Definition(Colonel Massey )
2's Definition(Colonel

Oh yes they are the same, almost any translators f*** up when translating English -> Chinese, even if it's made by Chinese. (No sarcasm detected, really)
In Chinese, we always put a person's name ahead of his/her job/rank (ALWAYS), while in Western civilizations job/rank is always ahead of a person's name (To my knowledge), but, they means essentially the same thing. These are two types of grammar, I'm just pointing out that if it's to look more like a Chinese typed it (especially you typed their names in Chinese), you should change it to 梅西上校, rather than 上校 梅西. Same applies for the other guy.
#48
Posted 03 February 2009 - 05:41
FCS The General, on 3 Feb 2009, 14:04, said:
Massey, on 2 Feb 2009, 18:30, said:
2.上校 梅西
1's Definition(Colonel Massey )
2's Definition(Colonel

Oh yes they are the same, almost any translators f*** up when translating English -> Chinese, even if it's made by Chinese. (No sarcasm detected, really)
In Chinese, we always put a person's name ahead of his/her job/rank (ALWAYS), while in Western civilizations job/rank is always ahead of a person's name (To my knowledge), but, they means essentially the same thing. These are two types of grammar, I'm just pointing out that if it's to look more like a Chinese typed it (especially you typed their names in Chinese), you should change it to 梅西上校, rather than 上校 梅西. Same applies for the other guy.
You sir are correct!!! on all counts! the lionel thing was becuase i add a word in my translatta so sry about that. ^.^
and my tranlatta SUCKs its tranlates words. good and all. but not the grammer :(
on a other note im working on the US attack in the Russia emial (from work ^.^ it will take a day or two so just wait around)
Edited by Massey, 03 February 2009 - 05:44.
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users