Your Religion
Libains
24 Apr 2009
Golan, on 24 Apr 2009, 17:46, said:
CodeCat, on 23 Apr 2009, 21:57, said:
An outcome that you like.
WNxMastrefubu, on 23 Apr 2009, 22:49, said:
a) What makes you think that God would apply your own moral standards?
b) Why the hell should she see humanity as her children?
I believe that it is mentioned in the Bible multiple times that we are God's children, as we were created by him in his own image. However, God does have no need to apply our morales in how he deals with us. Much in the same way that a Photographer will not interfere with Nature that he is photographing, God will not interfere with his creation here on Earth. I like to think that God has a hand in a few things - if not to necessarily cure an affliction the second it appears, but to alter something in a tiny way (Butterflies and wings anyone) so as to help humanity in the future.
BeefJeRKy
24 Apr 2009
ultimentra
24 Apr 2009
Good, the opposite of evil
Evil, the opposite of good
(these aren't really definitions but it gets my point around)
Take evil out of the equation
Good, the opposite of....what?
I think this explains my point.
SorataZ
24 Apr 2009
CommanderJB
25 Apr 2009
ultimentra, on 25 Apr 2009, 9:08, said:
Good, the opposite of evil
Evil, the opposite of good
(these aren't really definitions but it gets my point around)
Take evil out of the equation
Good, the opposite of....what?
I think this explains my point.
Edited by CommanderJB, 25 April 2009 - 02:35.
ultimentra
25 Apr 2009
Dauth
25 Apr 2009
CommanderJB
25 Apr 2009
Libains
25 Apr 2009
Dauth, on 25 Apr 2009, 14:32, said:
Not everybody reacts in the same way though - more people are likely to react negatively to something like that than positively. I'd rather have a stable childhood over one that has been distorted by others - I can't ever see it as a good thing personally.
CommanderJB, on 25 Apr 2009, 16:02, said:
JB has it spot on here - why would a God choose to make people suffer after having sent his own son to die to prevent them from being punished for their mistakes? Something very wrong there. Plus, look at third world countries - while us privileged souls are living mostly good lives, with the occasional bad thing happening, what do you say to those that live their lives in misery and pain - all it does is make them suffer - not make them appreciate good things as they are so damn rare it makes no difference.
Chyros
25 Apr 2009
AJ, on 25 Apr 2009, 17:10, said:
In before "God works in mysterious ways."
BeefJeRKy
25 Apr 2009
AJ, on 25 Apr 2009, 11:10, said:
CommanderJB, on 25 Apr 2009, 16:02, said:
JB has it spot on here - why would a God choose to make people suffer after having sent his own son to die to prevent them from being punished for their mistakes? Something very wrong there. Plus, look at third world countries - while us privileged souls are living mostly good lives, with the occasional bad thing happening, what do you say to those that live their lives in misery and pain - all it does is make them suffer - not make them appreciate good things as they are so damn rare it makes no difference.
Well as far as I know, it's not that God sends evil to us. God allows us to fall to temptation to test us and then tries to rescue because that is the path humanity chose after the fall in the Garden of Eden. Between the two testaments of the Bible, God goes from an almighty being who punishes the human race while leaving them a sliver of hope to an all-loving father figure who wishes to save us all. It is fairly confusing though. I think it's just that evil exists and God gives us the choice between it and good, and hopes that we choose the good.
TehKiller
25 Apr 2009
Chyros, on 25 Apr 2009, 16:12, said:
AJ, on 25 Apr 2009, 17:10, said:
IIRC the Bible says he sacrificed his son so that our sins should be forgiven (including the people who were dead before the arrival of the 2nd messiah) but still didnt wanted to remove the freedom of choice (as previously said would you like to impose your way on someones life or let him follow your way on his own will?)
nip
25 Apr 2009
Scope, on 25 Apr 2009, 18:57, said:
Well as far as I know, it's not that God sends evil to us. God allows us to fall to temptation to test us and then tries to rescue because that is the path humanity chose after the fall in the Garden of Eden. Between the two testaments of the Bible, God goes from an almighty being who punishes the human race while leaving them a sliver of hope to an all-loving father figure who wishes to save us all. It is fairly confusing though. I think it's just that evil exists and God gives us the choice between it and good, and hopes that we choose the good.
---------------------------o00o---°(_)°--o00o---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasn't it 'God' who was responsible for the great deluge that killed all life on earth except the creatures on the ark just because 'God' was a bit fed up with us humans? What an adorable saviour... is this (his) moral really worth copying? No, because 'God' is evil.
BeefJeRKy
25 Apr 2009
TehKiller
25 Apr 2009
"God" is the only thing keeping us as human beings not that organ called brain. If it were only atheists on earth trust me you would even live another second to see it
BeefJeRKy
25 Apr 2009
Golan
25 Apr 2009
KamuiK, on 25 Apr 2009, 0:31, said:
Having a feature as restraining as a fixed gender (or more precisely, the possibility of there being a "female" and "male" god) attributed to God does not coincide with any possible concept God that I find viable. No matter what, God doesn't get laid, so applying a sex to him is futile - it's like asking whether your neighbor's dog is running on a V8 engine. Describing her as female (instead of neutral) is more of a tribute to a friend of mine.
CodeCat, on 25 Apr 2009, 14:30, said:
They certainly helped me become the person I am today. Then again, some might argue that's not actually a good thing...
CommanderJB, on 25 Apr 2009, 16:02, said:
Our live is just a transition anyways, so the pain we have to endure is well worth the lessons we learn for the next step of our journey.
Edited by Golan, 25 April 2009 - 20:05.
SorataZ
25 Apr 2009
Golan, on 25 Apr 2009, 22:04, said:
Says a book several hundrets of years old and being translated at least 2 dozen times while the original speaking of Jesus, the arameian scrolls found at the red see back in 1945, is claimed heresy by the vatican...
Golan
25 Apr 2009
Edited by Golan, 25 April 2009 - 20:26.
Alias
25 Apr 2009
KamuiK, on 26 Apr 2009, 6:16, said:
Golan, on 25 Apr 2009, 22:04, said:
Says a book several hundrets of years old and being translated at least 2 dozen times while the original speaking of Jesus, the arameian scrolls found at the red see back in 1945, is claimed heresy by the vatican...
ultimentra
26 Apr 2009
CommanderJB
26 Apr 2009
Golan, on 26 Apr 2009, 6:04, said:
ultimentra, on 26 Apr 2009, 11:27, said: