Imperial Measurement: To Metric?
#76
Posted 08 June 2006 - 21:49
#77
Posted 08 June 2006 - 22:21
Moosy Crisp!, on 8 Jun 2006, 22:42, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Never heard of mistakes? I meant that 240 are metric and 3 are non-metric.
And here's the proof to back that up: http://en.wikipedia....iki/Metrication
Go dtiomsaítear do chód gan earráidí, is go gcríochnaítear do chláir go réidh. -Old Irish proverb
#78
Posted 08 June 2006 - 22:22
#79
Posted 08 June 2006 - 22:26
Go dtiomsaítear do chód gan earráidí, is go gcríochnaítear do chláir go réidh. -Old Irish proverb
#80
Posted 08 June 2006 - 22:52
#81
Posted 08 June 2006 - 23:07
#83
Posted 18 June 2006 - 12:31
Rumpullpus, on 29 Apr 2006, 07:45, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
1. Apple pies suck
2. American football sucks - it's a primitive form of football used before the rules that made the sport so popular and beautiful to watch were implemented. It shouldn't even be called football as mostly the hands are used.
3. In case you haven't noticed, most democracies use the metric system
I vote for the metric system because:
1. It's very simple
2. Saves time and money
3. A standardised world measuring system is preferrable for better understanding and not looking like an underdeveloped race that can't agree on how to measure by the time we establish diplomatic relations with alien species.
And the Imperial; system is a pile of jumbled outdated measuring units that started to exist during biblical times, although most of them are more recent.
Edited by Crush3r, 18 June 2006 - 12:34.
#84
Posted 19 June 2006 - 19:45
Back to the topic at hand: It would not save money for the countries using the Imperial system, but it would provide a global system of measure. This would make relations at least a bit easier.
Oh and apple pies are great
Edited by Switchblade, 19 June 2006 - 19:46.
#85
Posted 19 June 2006 - 19:48
And I like Shepherd Pie.
#87
Posted 20 June 2006 - 22:49
#88
Posted 29 July 2006 - 22:46
The dead do not suffer the living to pass.
The way is shut. It was made by those who are dead. And the dead keep it.
#89
Posted 08 August 2006 - 16:45
Switchblade, on 19 Jun 2006, 21:45, said:
I think you have never watched a game played by some major teams; and i mean European teams coming from the best leagues of the world ( Seria A, Bundesliga, etc. ). They DO try to hurt each other. Hurt badly i might add. Personally i like to look the Superball everys now and then, but i do'nt find Football more interesting then Soccer and Basket.
Back to Topic:
Implementing the Metric system in the US ( or in other countries who adopt it ) is kinda impossible. As an example you can take the change of the pressure measurement system in the EU: Its A LONG time now since it passed from BAR to Hectopascal, over 20 years if i'm not wrong, but still i don't know a single person who uses it. And it would not cost THAT muich money to change some pressure signs as it would cost to change all the road signs of a country.
Hell, in italy they still calculate with their old money ( example: wow, today i speant 30 €, thats 60 000 Lire! *rant* *rant* )
I don't know if you got my point as somehow today i can't get those damn english words in my head to create an entire sentence, but i tried somehow.....
#90
Posted 22 August 2006 - 23:00
ive listed other as due to the fun backwards educaation system of the midlands of england. I spent 4 years learning imperial before the school converted to metirc so i can understand both (am a little fuzzy on fliud measure and the name for 220 yards i think its a furlong).
As for who invented it they system has been around since the greeks but ahs been refined by various "intelligent" people over the years, i believe it was Queen Victoria who gave the mile its length of 1760 yeards (8 furlongs)
Im also a student of theoritical physics and would be crippled if i has to calculate all my work in imperial, it would seem im being stereotypically English in wants to hold onto a defective and outdated sysetm.
Bonus points will be awarded if anyone can tell me why the british aswell as i think 50 other countires is 4ft 8 1/2 inches wide. and im not putting it in metric for you either. jk its 1435mm
#91
Posted 08 September 2006 - 22:33
edit:SP
Edited by Dauth, 08 September 2006 - 22:34.
#92
Posted 14 November 2006 - 16:48
1 litre: 1 kg
0 degrees Celcius: water freezes
100 degrees Celcius: water boils
This sick sig was made by da man, Cattman2236. Yeeh boii!
Check da myspace @ Spiderspag's Myspace
You killed my entire family... and I don't like that sort of thing...
Technocracy- it's our only hope.
#93
Posted 15 November 2006 - 00:14
16oz. = 1lb?
#94
Posted 15 November 2006 - 10:00
Metric helps scientists but is irrelevent for the general public, we dont want kilometres, who knows in the UK what a km is? If your on the forum you probably have some computing knowledge and therefore can do maths. but your basic pleb is out in the cold when it comes to conversion
#96
Posted 15 November 2006 - 13:21
walk in to bar "Pint of ********" or "500ml of *******" the pint must stay
#97
Posted 16 November 2006 - 05:12
#98
Posted 16 November 2006 - 08:28
#99
Posted 16 November 2006 - 10:25
speed of light =1
hbar =1
#100
Posted 16 November 2006 - 11:16
Edited by Aquastorm, 16 November 2006 - 11:17.
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users