Bob, you'll like that. It's a parody of 90s fight em' up cartoons
#236526
Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:34
Bob, you'll like that. It's a parody of 90s fight em' up cartoons

F O R T H E N S
#236527
Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:49
Major Fuckup, on 20 November 2013 - 12:14, said:
General, on 20 November 2013 - 11:49, said:
Your hand would be vaporized if it got too close to a manly subject such as my self!
Yeah, such as you self!
#236528
Posted 20 November 2013 - 12:58
#236531
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:06
#236532
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:11

F O R T H E N S
#236533
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:16
Drag#!, on 20 November 2013 - 07:57, said:
Major Fuckup, on 20 November 2013 - 12:14, said:
General, on 20 November 2013 - 11:49, said:
Your hand would be vaporized if it got too close to a manly subject such as my self!
CJ, on 20 November 2013 - 13:27, said:
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm

#236534
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:26
#236535
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:28
Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 14:16, said:
You know, it raise some expectations for EA after they saw Activision earned a billion from a shitty game like Ghosts. So they probably thinking if they advertise well, no need to scratch it, hell they may even earn hundreds of millions of bucks from a shitty game, just like they do all the time!
Take note; they will release it by changing some things over here and there but it will be basically the same thing as the beta.
Edited by General, 20 November 2013 - 14:28.
#236536
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:39
#236537
Posted 20 November 2013 - 14:59
#236539
Posted 20 November 2013 - 15:16
#236540
Posted 20 November 2013 - 15:24
#236541
Posted 20 November 2013 - 18:51
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm

#236542
Posted 20 November 2013 - 19:12
#236543
Posted 20 November 2013 - 20:23
General, on 20 November 2013 - 19:12, said:
Examples of just how wrong it could go:
http://cinemassacre....n/avgnepisodes/
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm

#236544
Posted 20 November 2013 - 20:28
If you want to find new games with interesting concepts, just play indie games as most of the time they are working to similar constraints of the 90s game dev teams. As in small teams, low budget, simple (retro) graphics ect.
Big game studios can't risk putting a lot of money (and it is a lot of money, even more than it costs to make films or any other entertainment medium) on something that could flop. They have to stick to safe concepts that work every time, introducing small changes and just generally being a bit boring.
My point is game developers haven't changed, if Westwood were still around (it's more than likely most of them are actually still making games for other companies) they'd be exactly the same as EA Victory (or whatever it was called) because EA is calling the shots. Double Fine (an independent studio) has tried creating innovative games, but because of the lack of limitations (hardware allows you to do anything, but in the 90s there was a limit) nearly every game they have created is lacking something, or is filled with too many ideas. It's like they are the opposite of the controlling EA, but they've gone too far and their projects always feel like they are missing something. Maybe the 90s and early 2000s had an unique period of were games were just becoming popular and the hardware and software limitations meant developers had to be creative and they didn't need to spend months creating one concept, it could be done in days.
I think what I'm trying to say is it's never going to be the same and that you should just enjoy the occasional indie game

F O R T H E N S
#236545
Posted 20 November 2013 - 21:28
TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 20:28, said:
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm

#236546
Posted 20 November 2013 - 21:56
Any fps they do now will look like something already done. It is so hard to come up with an original piece but not extreme.
Monster Hunter, Dawn of War, XCOM, these are all very original and good games for their genre. But they tend to fuck them up for the reason Dr stated.
Hundreds of people work in game companies and they are actually taking a risk when creating a game.
It is easy to please hardcore fans of a genre, but hard to please everyone. Thats why current gen games sucks - to us. All you had to do for hardcore fans of a game is just to improve it, make a good dlc and there, they will enjoy it again. But others will not.
#236548
Posted 20 November 2013 - 22:05
Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 21:28, said:
TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 20:28, said:
Just because you can make a squeal doesn't mean you should

F O R T H E N S
#236549
#236550
Posted 20 November 2013 - 22:38
TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 22:05, said:
Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 21:28, said:
TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 20:28, said:
Just because you can make a squeal doesn't mean you should
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm






