330561 replies to this topic

[TheDR]

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 22:38, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 22:05, said:

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 21:28, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 20:28, said:

I think what I'm trying to say is it's never going to be the same and that you should just enjoy the occasional indie game

I agree, in fact I'm loving all this indieness about. However, while some fantastic new titles have come out, a lot of old doors haven't been closed yet, and due to IP issues they can't be closed.

Just because you can make a squeal doesn't mean you should

Name an example in the list I posted earlier of a game of which you would say "wow, I really think it would be a bad thing if they made a true sequel to that" .

Yeah but a true squeal is basically just the same game

You want them to release the same game with new levels/content? Like a decade late expansion pack or something? Sounds good!

[Chyros]

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 22:49, said:

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 22:38, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 22:05, said:

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 21:28, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 20:28, said:

I think what I'm trying to say is it's never going to be the same and that you should just enjoy the occasional indie game

I agree, in fact I'm loving all this indieness about. However, while some fantastic new titles have come out, a lot of old doors haven't been closed yet, and due to IP issues they can't be closed.

Just because you can make a squeal doesn't mean you should

Name an example in the list I posted earlier of a game of which you would say "wow, I really think it would be a bad thing if they made a true sequel to that" .

Yeah but a true squeal is basically just the same game

You want them to release the same game with new levels/content? Like a decade late expansion pack or something? Sounds good!

For some games, yeah, that's exactly what I want, actually .

[General]

CJ, on 20 November 2013 - 22:09, said:

Bob, on 20 November 2013 - 15:08, said:

WEN WESTWOOD 2.0!?

Oh you mean Petroglyph?

Seriously though, Empire at War was a good game. Too bad they ruined their record with Universe at War after that.

Universe at War had the potential of becoming a very good game but sadly they ruined it...

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 23:57, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 22:49, said:

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 22:38, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 22:05, said:

Chyros, on 20 November 2013 - 21:28, said:

TheDR, on 20 November 2013 - 20:28, said:

I think what I'm trying to say is it's never going to be the same and that you should just enjoy the occasional indie game

I agree, in fact I'm loving all this indieness about. However, while some fantastic new titles have come out, a lot of old doors haven't been closed yet, and due to IP issues they can't be closed.

Just because you can make a squeal doesn't mean you should

Name an example in the list I posted earlier of a game of which you would say "wow, I really think it would be a bad thing if they made a true sequel to that" .

Yeah but a true squeal is basically just the same game

You want them to release the same game with new levels/content? Like a decade late expansion pack or something? Sounds good!

For some games, yeah, that's exactly what I want, actually .

They did that with XCOM. Enemy Within is pretty good so far, just what I wanted. I wouldn't mind to pay 26 bucks to another cool dlc. Since they release utter shit game at 60$, I think such dlc content well worth it!

Edited by General, 21 November 2013 - 06:48.

[Wizard]

Space Balls!

[General]

Parody

Edited by General, 21 November 2013 - 09:10.

[Destiny]

PA is potential.

[General]

Destiny, on 21 November 2013 - 11:58, said:

PA is potential.

I have a feeling that it will not worth the hype, just hope it is not...

[Alias]

General, on 21 November 2013 - 12:42, said:

Destiny, on 21 November 2013 - 11:58, said:

PA is potential.

I have a feeling that it will not worth the hype, just hope it is not...

So far from what I've played, TA is better than it, although having an active community may entice me to play it more.

TA still plays a lot better though.

[Destiny]

Hmm

[Liten]

CJ, on 20 November 2013 - 22:09, said:

Bob, on 20 November 2013 - 15:08, said:

WEN WESTWOOD 2.0!?

Oh you mean Petroglyph?

Seriously though, Empire at War was a good game. Too bad they ruined their record with Universe at War after that.

The space battle in that game was amazing.

[TheDR]

The problem with PA is that it isn't balanced yet and doesn't run very well. When they sort it out, it should be good.

[General]

But problem is, will it be good enough!?

[TheDR]

Nothing will ever be 'good enough'. That is the fatal flaw of the word enough, it doesn't have a cut off point.

[General]

TheDR, on 21 November 2013 - 14:08, said:

Nothing will ever be 'good enough'. That is the fatal flaw of the word enough, it doesn't have a cut off point.

Thats right.

For a RTS game; Generals or C&C3 kind is enough to me.

[rage]WHY THE FUCK THEY STILL CAN'T DO A PROPER RTS WHICH I WILL BE ABLE TO PLAY FOR YEARS A FEW HOURS A DAY![/rage]

[Kaido]

Cause no company wants that money that you would provide for that game! They want to make F2P games only that are made for casuals!

[Destiny]

Yeah!

[General]

Drag#!, on 21 November 2013 - 14:43, said:

Cause no company wants that money that you would provide for that game! They want to make F2P games only that are made for casuals!

If Ghosts deserve to be sold at 69.99$, A new and proper RTS will worth 250$!

[Destiny]

Don't wanna

[Alias]

General, on 21 November 2013 - 14:50, said:

Drag#!, on 21 November 2013 - 14:43, said:

Cause no company wants that money that you would provide for that game! They want to make F2P games only that are made for casuals!

If Ghosts deserve to be sold at 69.99$, A new and proper RTS will worth 250$!

Don't be too loud, EA might listen.

[General]

Alias, on 21 November 2013 - 15:32, said:

General, on 21 November 2013 - 14:50, said:

Drag#!, on 21 November 2013 - 14:43, said:

Cause no company wants that money that you would provide for that game! They want to make F2P games only that are made for casuals!

If Ghosts deserve to be sold at 69.99$, A new and proper RTS will worth 250$!

Don't be too loud, EA might listen.

Don't worry, they can do new things but can't do them "properly"

[TheDR]

Tbh, with the DLC costs I wouldn't be surprised if a new RTS cost that much with all the content.

[Chyros]

Alias, on 21 November 2013 - 15:32, said:

General, on 21 November 2013 - 14:50, said:

Drag#!, on 21 November 2013 - 14:43, said:

Cause no company wants that money that you would provide for that game! They want to make F2P games only that are made for casuals!

If Ghosts deserve to be sold at 69.99$, A new and proper RTS will worth 250$!

Don't be too loud, EA might listen.

Hahaha, if EA make a new and proper RTS, I'll eat my hat AND pay them $250 . Chances of that are less than zero anyway .

[TheDR]

Generals 2: Zero Pounds Given

[Chyros]

Zica laser!

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

http://www.kodykoala...-monster-truck/