Wizard, on 17 July 2012 - 13:14, said:
#219126
Posted 17 July 2012 - 13:15
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#219127
Posted 17 July 2012 - 13:34
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
Sareen said:
#219128
Posted 17 July 2012 - 13:45
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
#219130
Posted 17 July 2012 - 16:43
#219132
Posted 17 July 2012 - 17:12
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 13:45, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
#219134
Posted 17 July 2012 - 17:34
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 17:12, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 13:45, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
That goes without saying. I'm even running Android 4 on this beast :o
#219135
Posted 17 July 2012 - 18:09
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 17:34, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 17:12, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 13:45, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
That goes without saying. I'm even running Android 4 on this beast :o
#219136
Posted 17 July 2012 - 18:41
F O R T H E N S
#219137
Posted 17 July 2012 - 18:46
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 18:09, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 17:34, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 17:12, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 13:45, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
That goes without saying. I'm even running Android 4 on this beast :o
Duh? Did you ever have a look at the Android Market?
What kinda apps do you think are iOS exclusive?
#219138
Posted 17 July 2012 - 18:59
F O R T H E N S
#219139
Posted 17 July 2012 - 19:10
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 18:46, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 18:09, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 17:34, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 17:12, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 13:45, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
That goes without saying. I'm even running Android 4 on this beast :o
Duh? Did you ever have a look at the Android Market?
What kinda apps do you think are iOS exclusive?
Android apps are on average several orders of magnitude lower quality than iOS apps. The designers and developers who know what they are doing all congregate and will initially develop on iOS because the platform is far more friendly for developers. Most of the higher-quality Android apps are made months after the iOS app is made, case in point Flipboard.
It's the same reason why third-party apps on OSX are, on average, of a higher standard as well.
Edited by Alias, 17 July 2012 - 19:11.
#219142
Posted 17 July 2012 - 20:59
#219143
Posted 17 July 2012 - 21:20
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 20:59, said:
#219144
Posted 17 July 2012 - 21:40
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 19:10, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 18:46, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 18:09, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 17:34, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 17:12, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 13:45, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 13:34, said:
CJ, on 17 July 2012 - 09:36, said:
Krieger22, on 17 July 2012 - 08:26, said:
My LG P500 is overclocked from 650Mhz to 850 (if I recall the numbers correctly)
That's what makes it superior to an iPhone 3 yet still cost 150€ :3
That goes without saying. I'm even running Android 4 on this beast :o
Duh? Did you ever have a look at the Android Market?
What kinda apps do you think are iOS exclusive?
Android apps are on average several orders of magnitude lower quality than iOS apps. The designers and developers who know what they are doing all congregate and will initially develop on iOS because the platform is far more friendly for developers. Most of the higher-quality Android apps are made months after the iOS app is made, case in point Flipboard.
It's the same reason why third-party apps on OSX are, on average, of a higher standard as well.
lolwat.
It is most definitely not more friendly for developers.
People primarily develop for iOS because "everyone has an iPhone / iPad" and I guess another reason is there are far less versions / screen sizes to design for, so in that sense it's easier.
#219145
Posted 17 July 2012 - 21:44
Kyle Carter said:
#219146
Posted 17 July 2012 - 21:55
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 21:20, said:
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 20:59, said:
Nope, IT Risk and Cyber Security role, London office, £30k a year...
#219147
Posted 17 July 2012 - 21:58
Bob, on 17 July 2012 - 21:40, said:
It is most definitely not more friendly for developers.
People primarily develop for iOS because "everyone has an iPhone / iPad" and I guess another reason is there are far less versions / screen sizes to design for, so in that sense it's easier.
In terms of design – having to deal with only two aspect ratios as well as only a specific set of devices makes everything a whole lot easier.
At one of my previous jobs I did design and a small amount of development for a multi-platform app. Android was easily the biggest pain in the arse to work with, not just because of Eclipse but because we needed to have about 9 different Android test phones and each of them had specific bugs relating not just to the platform itself, but the version and even a couple were only present on a certain brand.
That brings up the issue of fragmentation – with iOS around 90% of the ecosystem uses the same version and within a month or two most of the user base migrates to the latest version. With Android the vast majority still uses 2.x. Then of course there's the issue of vastly different hardware, from different resolutions to vastly different processing power.
The principles behind Android are nice, but they just don't work in a commercial world.
#219148
Posted 17 July 2012 - 22:30
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 21:55, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 21:20, said:
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 20:59, said:
Nope, IT Risk and Cyber Security role, London office, £30k a year...
I'm going to be in poverty for yours to come .
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#219149
Posted 17 July 2012 - 23:14
Chyros, on 17 July 2012 - 22:30, said:
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 21:55, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 21:20, said:
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 20:59, said:
Nope, IT Risk and Cyber Security role, London office, £30k a year...
I'm going to be in poverty for yours to come .
Good money, good hours, good job.
Plus, I'll be living in London, I'll be destitute
#219150
Posted 17 July 2012 - 23:41
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 23:14, said:
Chyros, on 17 July 2012 - 22:30, said:
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 21:55, said:
Alias, on 17 July 2012 - 21:20, said:
AJ, on 17 July 2012 - 20:59, said:
Nope, IT Risk and Cyber Security role, London office, £30k a year...
I'm going to be in poverty for yours to come .
Good money, good hours, good job.
Plus, I'll be living in London, I'll be destitute
wat
43 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 43 guests, 0 anonymous users