#220476
Posted 18 August 2012 - 08:41
F O R T H E N S
#220477
Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:06
Kyle Carter said:
#220479
Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:15
F O R T H E N S
#220480
Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:25
Sareen said:
#220481
Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:00
Kyle Carter said:
#220482
Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:52
#220483
Posted 18 August 2012 - 13:07
Major Fuckup, on 18 August 2012 - 06:50, said:
Pretty much exactly that, yeah .Bob, on 18 August 2012 - 10:06, said:
That seriously did make me laugh out loud very hard .
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#220484
Posted 18 August 2012 - 13:09
Ninety-eight percent washout rate. Twenty-two percent fatality rate. Some tout this like it is supposed to be a good thing. Others use it to criticize the commando training program, saying it is a complete waste of good human life. Neither side knows the truth. Technically, yes, the program produces a twenty-two percent fatality rate before training is completed. The reason why is both simple and complex.
Simply put, the training produces a twenty-two percent average fatality rate, which is the exact same current fatality rate attributed to active duty commandos. The reason for that is because as far as the Commando Program is concerned, you never graduate. Every mission is a brutal learning experience, and the loss ratios are high, despite the advanced weapons, the strength-enhancing reactive polymer weaves beneath the reinforced armor plating. These are men and women who plunge into the most dangerous operations across the globe: reconnoiter into Nod-held cities, pursuit of mutant raiding parties, assaults on dangerous sites in the Red Zones. They die.
There is no graduation for a commando. You join, you learn, you fight, you kill, and if you don't wash out by going back to your old unit, you die in service. In "training."
Its brutal, but that's what the commando is all about. If you didn't have the mindset to commit yourself to the life of the commando, you can't handle the mental stresses of the job in the first place.
That's where the washout rate comes from. That's where the high fatalities in "training" come from. There are no bloody drills and bloodless battle; for a GDI commando, they are one and the same. Learn or die.
Sareen said:
#220485
Posted 18 August 2012 - 14:24
F O R T H E N S
#220486
Posted 18 August 2012 - 14:34
Kyle Carter said:
#220487
Posted 18 August 2012 - 14:41
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#220488
Posted 18 August 2012 - 14:57
Krieger22, on 18 August 2012 - 13:09, said:
Source?
#220489
Posted 18 August 2012 - 15:27
Krieger22, on 18 August 2012 - 13:09, said:
Intel - GDI Archives - Excerpt: A Concise Explanation of the GDI Commando Program - Colonel Jack Harper, GDI 22nd Special Operations Battalion
Ninety-eight percent washout rate. Twenty-two percent fatality rate. Some tout this like it is supposed to be a good thing. Others use it to criticize the commando training program, saying it is a complete waste of good human life. Neither side knows the truth. Technically, yes, the program produces a twenty-two percent fatality rate before training is completed. The reason why is both simple and complex.
Simply put, the training produces a twenty-two percent average fatality rate, which is the exact same current fatality rate attributed to active duty commandos. The reason for that is because as far as the Commando Program is concerned, you never graduate. Every mission is a brutal learning experience, and the loss ratios are high, despite the advanced weapons, the strength-enhancing reactive polymer weaves beneath the reinforced armor plating. These are men and women who plunge into the most dangerous operations across the globe: reconnoiter into Nod-held cities, pursuit of mutant raiding parties, assaults on dangerous sites in the Red Zones. They die.
There is no graduation for a commando. You join, you learn, you fight, you kill, and if you don't wash out by going back to your old unit, you die in service. In "training."
Its brutal, but that's what the commando is all about. If you didn't have the mindset to commit yourself to the life of the commando, you can't handle the mental stresses of the job in the first place.
That's where the washout rate comes from. That's where the high fatalities in "training" come from. There are no bloody drills and bloodless battle; for a GDI commando, they are one and the same. Learn or die.
Thats same for real life commandos. I got commando training but did not become one since my arm muscles too low for the job. Though commando title remains, they don't send you to missions.
#220490
Posted 18 August 2012 - 18:09
Chyros, on 18 August 2012 - 13:07, said:
Thought some one would get a kick out of that
I question the general assumption that i am inherently deficient in the area of grammar and sentence structure
#220491
Posted 18 August 2012 - 19:05
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#220493
Posted 18 August 2012 - 19:17
Chyros, on 18 August 2012 - 19:05, said:
The UK still has a fair amount of Imperial nonsense, the US of course doesn't even know how to use proper measurements and Canada has the usual corruption that seeps over the border.
#220494
Posted 18 August 2012 - 20:11
Alias, on 18 August 2012 - 19:17, said:
Chyros, on 18 August 2012 - 19:05, said:
The UK still has a fair amount of Imperial nonsense, the US of course doesn't even know how to use proper measurements and Canada has the usual corruption that seeps over the border.
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#220496
Posted 18 August 2012 - 22:29
F O R T H E N S
#220497
Posted 18 August 2012 - 22:54
#220499
Posted 18 August 2012 - 23:08
Its definitely worth a try though!
F O R T H E N S
#220500
Posted 18 August 2012 - 23:46
68 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 68 guests, 0 anonymous users