329485 replies to this topic

[General]

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 13:34, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 11:46, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 11:05, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:17, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 10:04, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 09:02, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 09:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 08:23, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 08:20, said:

Terror bike spam! Worst enemy of terror bike spam was choppers. Anyone who played a game with me should recall endless waves of terror bikes

Oh come on . That would never have worked .

There were a few units that could deal with Comanches, but they were very rare. The Tiger and the balloon pretty much.

I know, but terror bike spam is very useful if your enemy forgot to build choppers Or simply build dozens of quad tanks to secure the area, choppers will either deal with bikes or quads, a hard choice

Not a hard choice .

It actually is. If you choose to destroy Quad tanks; terror bikes will enter the base and blow up everything around them. If you choose to destroy terror bike spam; quads will destroy choppers and enter the base anyway

You have much to learn, young padawan .

Oh of course there will be other units around, but people who does the spamming almost always ignore to build other units so my tactic works on most matches. Though any good player will know how to counter it. Thats what I love about Generals much, you can counter any situation, and yes, even mass super weapon usage.

If you think mass super weapon usage is a tactic, you don't know how to play the game, sorry .

Well, it is. I've played a game with a dude(don't remember whom now) which turns out we both were turtling.

See what I mean?

Turtling is good, it takes around 10-15 minutes if both sides rush, sometimes less...

[Destiny]

General, on 31 October 2013 - 13:35, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 13:34, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 11:46, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 11:05, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:17, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 10:04, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 09:02, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 09:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 08:23, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 08:20, said:

Terror bike spam! Worst enemy of terror bike spam was choppers. Anyone who played a game with me should recall endless waves of terror bikes

Oh come on . That would never have worked . There were a few units that could deal with Comanches, but they were very rare. The Tiger and the balloon pretty much.

I know, but terror bike spam is very useful if your enemy forgot to build choppers Or simply build dozens of quad tanks to secure the area, choppers will either deal with bikes or quads, a hard choice

Not a hard choice .

It actually is. If you choose to destroy Quad tanks; terror bikes will enter the base and blow up everything around them. If you choose to destroy terror bike spam; quads will destroy choppers and enter the base anyway

You have much to learn, young padawan .

Oh of course there will be other units around, but people who does the spamming almost always ignore to build other units so my tactic works on most matches. Though any good player will know how to counter it. Thats what I love about Generals much, you can counter any situation, and yes, even mass super weapon usage.

If you think mass super weapon usage is a tactic, you don't know how to play the game, sorry .

Well, it is. I've played a game with a dude(don't remember whom now) which turns out we both were turtling.

See what I mean?

Turtling is good, it takes around 10-15 minutes if both sides rush, sometimes less...

Hahaha, I still remember that one game of ShW, where we fought in some defense map called GLA forest or something. When I took up defensive position right up front, Doc was like 'Seriously? AFG?' or something like that. Then when the AI units came along...


Well, there was that flanking bunch of Emperors that came from the left, but a single Kingmanche took care of them all. To the middle there was a little canyon someone was defending with Ironside, but it got broken and...well, I can only remember so much but we won in the end :3

[General]

Destiny, on 31 October 2013 - 15:15, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 13:35, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 13:34, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 11:46, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 11:05, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:17, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 10:04, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 09:02, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 09:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 08:23, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 08:20, said:

Terror bike spam! Worst enemy of terror bike spam was choppers. Anyone who played a game with me should recall endless waves of terror bikes

Oh come on . That would never have worked . There were a few units that could deal with Comanches, but they were very rare. The Tiger and the balloon pretty much.

I know, but terror bike spam is very useful if your enemy forgot to build choppers Or simply build dozens of quad tanks to secure the area, choppers will either deal with bikes or quads, a hard choice

Not a hard choice .

It actually is. If you choose to destroy Quad tanks; terror bikes will enter the base and blow up everything around them. If you choose to destroy terror bike spam; quads will destroy choppers and enter the base anyway

You have much to learn, young padawan .

Oh of course there will be other units around, but people who does the spamming almost always ignore to build other units so my tactic works on most matches. Though any good player will know how to counter it. Thats what I love about Generals much, you can counter any situation, and yes, even mass super weapon usage.

If you think mass super weapon usage is a tactic, you don't know how to play the game, sorry .

Well, it is. I've played a game with a dude(don't remember whom now) which turns out we both were turtling.

See what I mean?

Turtling is good, it takes around 10-15 minutes if both sides rush, sometimes less...

Hahaha, I still remember that one game of ShW, where we fought in some defense map called GLA forest or something. When I took up defensive position right up front, Doc was like 'Seriously? AFG?' or something like that. Then when the AI units came along...


Well, there was that flanking bunch of Emperors that came from the left, but a single Kingmanche took care of them all. To the middle there was a little canyon someone was defending with Ironside, but it got broken and...well, I can only remember so much but we won in the end :3

Best defence is GLA's, you can fill the map with defence structures without worrying about the power, and if you make a proper network with tunnel networks to back up the stinger sites when needed; it becomes almost unpassable! And of course you must feed those tunnels with endless number of terror bikes. Yeah, thats my best strategy, unlimited terror bikes!

Edited by General, 31 October 2013 - 16:11.

[CJ]

Destiny, on 31 October 2013 - 15:15, said:

Hahaha, I still remember that one game of ShW, where we fought in some defense map called GLA forest or something. When I took up defensive position right up front, Doc was like 'Seriously? AFG?' or something like that. Then when the AI units came along...

Well, there was that flanking bunch of Emperors that came from the left, but a single Kingmanche took care of them all. To the middle there was a little canyon someone was defending with Ironside, but it got broken and...well, I can only remember so much but we won in the end :3

This is at least the 4th time I see you posting this same story

[General]

CJ, on 31 October 2013 - 16:44, said:

Destiny, on 31 October 2013 - 15:15, said:

Hahaha, I still remember that one game of ShW, where we fought in some defense map called GLA forest or something. When I took up defensive position right up front, Doc was like 'Seriously? AFG?' or something like that. Then when the AI units came along...

Well, there was that flanking bunch of Emperors that came from the left, but a single Kingmanche took care of them all. To the middle there was a little canyon someone was defending with Ironside, but it got broken and...well, I can only remember so much but we won in the end :3

This is at least the 4th time I see you posting this same story

You record how many times he did that? Who are you!? Working for NSA? All this time, we trusted you!

[Chyros]

General, on 31 October 2013 - 13:35, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 13:34, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 11:46, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 11:05, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:17, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 10:04, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 09:02, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 09:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 08:23, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 08:20, said:

Terror bike spam! Worst enemy of terror bike spam was choppers. Anyone who played a game with me should recall endless waves of terror bikes

Oh come on . That would never have worked .

There were a few units that could deal with Comanches, but they were very rare. The Tiger and the balloon pretty much.

I know, but terror bike spam is very useful if your enemy forgot to build choppers Or simply build dozens of quad tanks to secure the area, choppers will either deal with bikes or quads, a hard choice

Not a hard choice .

It actually is. If you choose to destroy Quad tanks; terror bikes will enter the base and blow up everything around them. If you choose to destroy terror bike spam; quads will destroy choppers and enter the base anyway

You have much to learn, young padawan .

Oh of course there will be other units around, but people who does the spamming almost always ignore to build other units so my tactic works on most matches. Though any good player will know how to counter it. Thats what I love about Generals much, you can counter any situation, and yes, even mass super weapon usage.

If you think mass super weapon usage is a tactic, you don't know how to play the game, sorry .

Well, it is. I've played a game with a dude(don't remember whom now) which turns out we both were turtling.

See what I mean?

Turtling is good, it takes around 10-15 minutes if both sides rush, sometimes less...

If you like turtling and do not like rushing, you honestly know absolutely nothing about online play .

[General]

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 19:04, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 13:35, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 13:34, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 11:46, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 11:05, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:17, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 10:04, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 10:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 09:02, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 09:00, said:

Chyros, on 31 October 2013 - 08:23, said:

General, on 31 October 2013 - 08:20, said:

Terror bike spam! Worst enemy of terror bike spam was choppers. Anyone who played a game with me should recall endless waves of terror bikes

Oh come on . That would never have worked .

There were a few units that could deal with Comanches, but they were very rare. The Tiger and the balloon pretty much.

I know, but terror bike spam is very useful if your enemy forgot to build choppers Or simply build dozens of quad tanks to secure the area, choppers will either deal with bikes or quads, a hard choice

Not a hard choice .

It actually is. If you choose to destroy Quad tanks; terror bikes will enter the base and blow up everything around them. If you choose to destroy terror bike spam; quads will destroy choppers and enter the base anyway

You have much to learn, young padawan .

Oh of course there will be other units around, but people who does the spamming almost always ignore to build other units so my tactic works on most matches. Though any good player will know how to counter it. Thats what I love about Generals much, you can counter any situation, and yes, even mass super weapon usage.

If you think mass super weapon usage is a tactic, you don't know how to play the game, sorry .

Well, it is. I've played a game with a dude(don't remember whom now) which turns out we both were turtling.

See what I mean?

Turtling is good, it takes around 10-15 minutes if both sides rush, sometimes less...

If you like turtling and do not like rushing, you honestly know absolutely nothing about online play .

I do know. But I always take my time. Only game I played completely for the win was DOW2 and I was doing very good at it.
For example, I use sniper most of the time at COD and attempt to shot from the head every single time, while doing at the body will do good and take less time and focus. Or trying to run around and knife people

[Liten]

You gotta shot from the head!

[CJ]

Boot to the head!

[General]

Liten, on 31 October 2013 - 22:51, said:

You gotta shot from the head!

BOOM!

[CJ]

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

[TheDR]

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

[Krieger22]

TheDR, on 01 November 2013 - 09:10, said:

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

Is Hanlon's Razor another name for that?

[General]

TheDR, on 01 November 2013 - 09:10, said:

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

Perhaps single player looks more appealing than playing with retards

[Krieger22]

General, on 01 November 2013 - 09:23, said:

TheDR, on 01 November 2013 - 09:10, said:

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

Perhaps single player looks more appealing than playing with retards

No idea why, even John Riccitiello admits that most players of CoD AND BF go straight to MP...

[Chyros]

Krieger22, on 01 November 2013 - 12:44, said:

General, on 01 November 2013 - 09:23, said:

TheDR, on 01 November 2013 - 09:10, said:

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

Perhaps single player looks more appealing than playing with retards

No idea why, even John Riccitiello admits that most players of CoD AND BF go straight to MP...

Hmmm, as I recall actually the amount of SP players is still more than the amount of MP players for CoD, but the MP players put in the vast majority of playtime. I imagine it'd be something similar for BF, but can't be sure.

[Krieger22]

Chyros, on 01 November 2013 - 12:55, said:

Krieger22, on 01 November 2013 - 12:44, said:

General, on 01 November 2013 - 09:23, said:

TheDR, on 01 November 2013 - 09:10, said:

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

Perhaps single player looks more appealing than playing with retards

No idea why, even John Riccitiello admits that most players of CoD AND BF go straight to MP...

Hmmm, as I recall actually the amount of SP players is still more than the amount of MP players for CoD, but the MP players put in the vast majority of playtime. I imagine it'd be something similar for BF, but can't be sure.

IIRC most BF players play MP or at least do so more than SP, prior to the first Bad Company even the SP was just MP with AI bots instead of other players

[CJ]

Chyros, on 01 November 2013 - 12:55, said:

Krieger22, on 01 November 2013 - 12:44, said:

General, on 01 November 2013 - 09:23, said:

TheDR, on 01 November 2013 - 09:10, said:

CJ, on 01 November 2013 - 08:36, said:

Well, turns out Battlefield 4's campaign was crap /feigns surprise.
Seriously, I don't know why they bother making SP when they know only idiots play BF games for the story. Oh wait, right, that's cause the majority of the planet's population is retarded!

I call that "The Idiot Rule". Meaning that if you suspect someone is doing something odd, it's probably because they are stupid.

Perhaps single player looks more appealing than playing with retards

No idea why, even John Riccitiello admits that most players of CoD AND BF go straight to MP...

Hmmm, as I recall actually the amount of SP players is still more than the amount of MP players for CoD, but the MP players put in the vast majority of playtime. I imagine it'd be something similar for BF, but can't be sure.

The only reason to play the BF4 single player is to get the unlocks that can't be gotten in the MP
BF3's campaign however was enjoyable at least. Especially the jet mission.

[TheDR]

BF3 was pants because it doesn't run very well and disconnect from everything!

[General]

No problem, since my PC can't run it at all And I have no clue why, something wrong with the making of these games... Dead Space 2 at max settings runs without an observable fps drop but can't run that shit BF3 on medium, it actually runs but there is no meaning to play a game if it will be like slideshow

[TheDR]

Dead Space is quite corridory while BF3 is large open spaces. That's why

[Major Fuckup]

My heart is like an open highway.

[TheDR]

Does that mean someone should speed down it in a ute and then bash your ribcage with their bullbars?

[Liten]

Yes.

[Chyros]

Major Fuckup, on 01 November 2013 - 22:36, said:

My heart is like an open highway.

OH-HO, WE'RE HALFWAY THERE