Wanna play C&C 3 TW on highest graphics and screen resolution of your monitor? please be sure you really gonna need this for playing it on highest!
Minimal Req:
CPU: AMD/Intel 2.4Ghz
Video Card:
AGP: Geforce 6600GT 128MB
PCI-E: Geforce 6600GT 128MB
Memory: 1Gb
Direct-X: Version 10
Harddisk Space: 5.5Gb / 6.2Gb
Recomment Req:
CPU: AMD 64/ Intel 2.4Ghz
VideoCard:
AGP: Geforce 6800GT 256MB
PCI-E: Geforce 6800GT 256MB
Memory: 1Gb
Direct-X: Version 10
Harddisk Space: 5.5Gb / 6.2Gb
With videocards i rather a Geforce 6800GT 256MB to at Minimal Req
And Recomment i rather Geforce 7600GT or higher!
0
C&C 3 Tiberium Wars (System Requirements) "Unofficial"
Started By Chrizz, Jul 29 2006 23:28
82 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Gold Member
-
- 2012 posts
E-Studios™ 2012
-
Projects: C&C3: Tiberium Icestorm
Posted 29 July 2006 - 23:28
#2
-
- Member
-
- 8743 posts
<Custom title available>
Posted 29 July 2006 - 23:38
YES I match all recommended req!!!
#3
-
- Project Team
-
- 6796 posts
Divine Chaos
-
Projects: Sigma Invasion
Posted 29 July 2006 - 23:45
I'm not sure if I do though.
Insomniac!, on 16 Sep 2008, 20:12, said:
Soul you scare the hell out of me, more so than Lizzie.
I've been given a Bob coin from Mr. Bob, a life time supply of cookies from Blonde-Unknown, some Internet Chocolate from the Full Throttle mod team, and some Assorted Weapons from Høbbesy.
#4
-
- Member
-
- 284 posts
Semi-Pro
Posted 30 July 2006 - 13:33
i'm gonna get a new comp so it shouldn't be a problem. what does the title mean with the engine of bfme2?
Who enters my domain?
The dead do not suffer the living to pass.
The way is shut. It was made by those who are dead. And the dead keep it.
The dead do not suffer the living to pass.
The way is shut. It was made by those who are dead. And the dead keep it.
#5
-
- Administrator
-
- 9337 posts
Not a Wonky Gent.
Posted 30 July 2006 - 14:38
battle for middle earth 2 
F O R T H E N S
#6
-
- Member
-
- 62 posts
Casual
Posted 30 July 2006 - 21:32
It took this much for me to get a 7-Hard-AIs Skirmish Shockwave game at maximum detail in a not-very-detailed map to run, and at it's height it still slows down a lot...
AMD Athlon-64 3200+
MSI nForce 3 Motherboard
2GB DRR400 RAM
ATi Radeon X700 Pro AGP
Creative Labs X-fi
SATA-I 300GB HDD
My next machine plans for the future, with the idea of hopefully playing C&C3 at maximum with no slowdown...
Core 2 Duo E6600 or E6700
ASUS nForce 5 motherboard
4GB DDR-800
GeForce 8-series (high-end)
Creative Labs X-fi
SATA-II 600GB RAID-0 HDD
I pray I can afford that, and that it'll actually run C&C3 at full detail, max resolution, and no slowdown (with the maximum number of hard AIs in skirmish, and with a nicely detailed map). It's just a plan, so things may change.
AMD Athlon-64 3200+
MSI nForce 3 Motherboard
2GB DRR400 RAM
ATi Radeon X700 Pro AGP
Creative Labs X-fi
SATA-I 300GB HDD
My next machine plans for the future, with the idea of hopefully playing C&C3 at maximum with no slowdown...
Core 2 Duo E6600 or E6700
ASUS nForce 5 motherboard
4GB DDR-800
GeForce 8-series (high-end)
Creative Labs X-fi
SATA-II 600GB RAID-0 HDD
I pray I can afford that, and that it'll actually run C&C3 at full detail, max resolution, and no slowdown (with the maximum number of hard AIs in skirmish, and with a nicely detailed map). It's just a plan, so things may change.
Run for your lives, but let me go first!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
#7
-
- Gold Member
-
- 11369 posts
Masters of Booty Strike Force
-
Projects: ShockWave
Posted 30 July 2006 - 21:35
zero hour game engine is pretty crap and not optimised. CnC 3 will be much more refined so on high end machines it should run very very smoothly.
Edited by Prophet of the Pimps, 30 July 2006 - 21:35.
Never underestimate a Resourceful Idiot
#8
-
- Member
-
- 62 posts
Casual
Posted 30 July 2006 - 21:38
Prophet: I have my doubts about that, due to how much the engine seems to have changed. Don't get me wrong, though, I absolutely hope and pray that you're right. If my new machine, whatever the specs, runs the game like I want, I will be beyond happy. I will make happy people look depressed.
Run for your lives, but let me go first!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
#9
-
- Gold Member
-
- 8156 posts
.
Posted 30 July 2006 - 21:40
I think I should be able to run it all right without too much of a strain on resources, though I feel my video card is the weakest link so I'll be upgrading it when the time draws near.
#10
-
- Member
-
- 8743 posts
<Custom title available>
Posted 30 July 2006 - 21:41
I should probably upgrade just in case.
256 graphics sucks.
256 graphics sucks.
#11
-
- Gold Member
-
- 2012 posts
E-Studios™ 2012
-
Projects: C&C3: Tiberium Icestorm
Posted 31 July 2006 - 00:17
be sure u got 265Bit videocard interface C&C3 needs full power of there videocard(s)
#12
-
- Project Team
-
- 6796 posts
Divine Chaos
-
Projects: Sigma Invasion
Posted 31 July 2006 - 00:21
I'm not sure what my comp is atm I need to fined out but I'll more then likely have to upgrade pretty much everything I'm sure of that.
Insomniac!, on 16 Sep 2008, 20:12, said:
Soul you scare the hell out of me, more so than Lizzie.
I've been given a Bob coin from Mr. Bob, a life time supply of cookies from Blonde-Unknown, some Internet Chocolate from the Full Throttle mod team, and some Assorted Weapons from Høbbesy.
#13
-
- Member
-
- 284 posts
Semi-Pro
Posted 31 July 2006 - 15:28
Cystos, how much are you planning to pay for that?
Who enters my domain?
The dead do not suffer the living to pass.
The way is shut. It was made by those who are dead. And the dead keep it.
The dead do not suffer the living to pass.
The way is shut. It was made by those who are dead. And the dead keep it.
#14
-
- Banned
-
- 858 posts
Raining heavy metal!
Posted 31 July 2006 - 16:38
I have Radaeon 9800 it good?
I can run aow ht on med med low good
I can run aow ht on med med low good
#15
-
- Member
-
- 62 posts
Casual
Posted 03 August 2006 - 07:27
It'll probably run up near a couple grand. I'll start with just 2GB of RAM, and add more later. I'm planning on selling my old machine and a few other things to help raise a portion of the funding.
The Core 2 Duo E6600 isn't that expensive, but it'll still beat an FX-62! It's $320 or so for groups of $1000, expected per unit price is just over $400 (I think, not certain). Impressive! The motherboard will likely be around $150, if it's anything near the AMD nForce5 boards.
The X-fi and one of the SATA-II HDDs are already aquired. The PSU will likely run about $100, the case about $200. The RAM should be about $260 for 2GB. Graphics card, $400. The other HDD, $100.
So, that's roughly $1600, plus shipping. Hopefully the selling of stuff will net me at least $800, preferably $1000. If I manage to get $1100 in sales I'll get the 4GB of RAM right off the bat!
I also plan on adding a TV Tuner card, but that's in a separate budget and will also go into my current machine before I get the new one.
-------
The Radeon 9800 will run it, but not very quickly. You'll likely be at minimum settings. Also, I and several others I know have had 9800s fail on us. The fan siezes up. Be warned!
The Core 2 Duo E6600 isn't that expensive, but it'll still beat an FX-62! It's $320 or so for groups of $1000, expected per unit price is just over $400 (I think, not certain). Impressive! The motherboard will likely be around $150, if it's anything near the AMD nForce5 boards.
The X-fi and one of the SATA-II HDDs are already aquired. The PSU will likely run about $100, the case about $200. The RAM should be about $260 for 2GB. Graphics card, $400. The other HDD, $100.
So, that's roughly $1600, plus shipping. Hopefully the selling of stuff will net me at least $800, preferably $1000. If I manage to get $1100 in sales I'll get the 4GB of RAM right off the bat!
I also plan on adding a TV Tuner card, but that's in a separate budget and will also go into my current machine before I get the new one.
-------
The Radeon 9800 will run it, but not very quickly. You'll likely be at minimum settings. Also, I and several others I know have had 9800s fail on us. The fan siezes up. Be warned!
Edited by Cvstos, 03 August 2006 - 07:28.
Run for your lives, but let me go first!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
#16
-
- Member
-
- 965 posts
Death Before Dishonour!
-
Projects: Warboss Nooka's personal Wartrukk.
Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:49
Since my graphics card is getting up there and showing my slight lack of computer lingo...what do AGP and PCI-E mean?
#17
-
- Member
-
- 62 posts
Casual
Posted 03 August 2006 - 18:48
OK, when you install a new card into your system, there's a slot it goes into. Graphics cards can use one of the following:
PCI
AGP
PCI-Express x16
If all you have are PCI slots (no AGP or PCI-E), give up now and get a new computer. They simply lack the bandwidth to process modern graphics, and graphics cards are no longer made for these slots. They are still useful for sound cards, physics cards, wireless cards, TV tuners, etc. In other words, they've still got a lot of useful things for them, just not graphics.
AGP is still servicable, but barely. What cards you will find will be overpriced compared to PCI-E cards, and significantly underpowered, too. Consider upgrading or getting a new computer soon, as AGP won't be around that much longer, and for good reason. It was great in it's time, but is quite slow compared to PCI-E.
PCI-E x16 is the way to go. (Note that PCI-X is something different and only really found on servers and high-end workstations. Avoid these if you're a gamer, there's no point to them.) By far, PCI-E x16 offers the best bandwidth and is the best solution for gaming graphics on the market today. Some systems even have twin x16 slots for running two cards at once. For nVIDIA cards, this is known as SLI. For ATi, it's called Crossfire. Motherboards will only support one or the other (or neither). Be certain to read up on which if you want to use this feature.
With current graphics cards, an nVIDIA GeForce 7600 or ATi Radeon X1600 (PCI-Express x16, naturally) is recommended. They aren't too horribly expensive, but are still plenty powerful and will run any of today's games.
PCI
AGP
PCI-Express x16
If all you have are PCI slots (no AGP or PCI-E), give up now and get a new computer. They simply lack the bandwidth to process modern graphics, and graphics cards are no longer made for these slots. They are still useful for sound cards, physics cards, wireless cards, TV tuners, etc. In other words, they've still got a lot of useful things for them, just not graphics.
AGP is still servicable, but barely. What cards you will find will be overpriced compared to PCI-E cards, and significantly underpowered, too. Consider upgrading or getting a new computer soon, as AGP won't be around that much longer, and for good reason. It was great in it's time, but is quite slow compared to PCI-E.
PCI-E x16 is the way to go. (Note that PCI-X is something different and only really found on servers and high-end workstations. Avoid these if you're a gamer, there's no point to them.) By far, PCI-E x16 offers the best bandwidth and is the best solution for gaming graphics on the market today. Some systems even have twin x16 slots for running two cards at once. For nVIDIA cards, this is known as SLI. For ATi, it's called Crossfire. Motherboards will only support one or the other (or neither). Be certain to read up on which if you want to use this feature.
With current graphics cards, an nVIDIA GeForce 7600 or ATi Radeon X1600 (PCI-Express x16, naturally) is recommended. They aren't too horribly expensive, but are still plenty powerful and will run any of today's games.
Edited by Cvstos, 03 August 2006 - 22:57.
Run for your lives, but let me go first!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
Oh great, in lieu of a parachute, here's a hanky!
#18
-
- Member
-
- 965 posts
Death Before Dishonour!
-
Projects: Warboss Nooka's personal Wartrukk.
Posted 03 August 2006 - 21:22
Woohoo, now I'm edjumacated! 
All kidding aside, Cvstos thanks for explaining my dilema, in detail might I add.
All kidding aside, Cvstos thanks for explaining my dilema, in detail might I add.
#19
-
- Gold Member
-
- 2012 posts
E-Studios™ 2012
-
Projects: C&C3: Tiberium Icestorm
Posted 03 August 2006 - 22:39
I get my new system soon. hehe :drunk:
2x XFX GeForce 7900GT PCIe x16
2x OCZ DIMM 1 GB
Asus M2N32WS WS Professional AM2 Socked Motherboard
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 5000+ AM2 Socked
1x Zalman CNPS 9500 AM2 AM2 Cooler
1x Asus Nvidia Ageia PhysX P1
2x XFX GeForce 7900GT PCIe x16
2x OCZ DIMM 1 GB
Asus M2N32WS WS Professional AM2 Socked Motherboard
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 5000+ AM2 Socked
1x Zalman CNPS 9500 AM2 AM2 Cooler
1x Asus Nvidia Ageia PhysX P1
#20
-
- Banned
-
- 858 posts
Raining heavy metal!
Posted 06 August 2006 - 22:16
Ya my comp is so fucking loud. Need to get a new fan/card. Probably just a bigger centreal CPU fan.
#21
-
- Member
-
- 11705 posts
Member Title Goes Here
Posted 07 August 2006 - 00:19
I bet you guys it will run on my shiz 
It ran Generals with it below the rec requirements... I can run HL2 on it with 50-55 fps
Something is supernatural about my 933mhz processor
The thing I don't have is the hard disk space
It ran Generals with it below the rec requirements... I can run HL2 on it with 50-55 fps
Something is supernatural about my 933mhz processor
The thing I don't have is the hard disk space
#22
-
- Member
-
- 3078 posts
The Hated
Posted 11 August 2006 - 09:24
You guys check my shizzle, it's so crap that my friend laughed at me!
CPU: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Video Card:
AGP: -
PCI-E: RADEON X300/X550 Series
Memory: 510MB RAM
Direct-X: DirectX 9.0c
Harddisk Space: I've used a little over a quarter of a 229GB Hard-Disk, you tell me.
Lmao, teh sux0r, I know.
But it played ZH and F.E.A.R., so I was happy.
CPU: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Video Card:
AGP: -
PCI-E: RADEON X300/X550 Series
Memory: 510MB RAM
Direct-X: DirectX 9.0c
Harddisk Space: I've used a little over a quarter of a 229GB Hard-Disk, you tell me.
Lmao, teh sux0r, I know.
But it played ZH and F.E.A.R., so I was happy.
You'll only notice me when it's too late.
#23
-
- Gold Member
-
- 11369 posts
Masters of Booty Strike Force
-
Projects: ShockWave
Posted 11 August 2006 - 09:48
P4-1.7 mhz,
256mb 266mhz DDR ram that cant updated because i cant find an older module compatible with my motherboard
Geforce FX5200 128mb which is a budget card and just barely lets you run stuff.
a 40 and one 80 GB hard drive.
Well this is my crap comp.
Just waiting for my acer Ferrari Laptop to arrive soon. Sure it wont run everything on high specs bit it will be a vast improvement over my current specs.
256mb 266mhz DDR ram that cant updated because i cant find an older module compatible with my motherboard
Geforce FX5200 128mb which is a budget card and just barely lets you run stuff.
a 40 and one 80 GB hard drive.
Well this is my crap comp.
Just waiting for my acer Ferrari Laptop to arrive soon. Sure it wont run everything on high specs bit it will be a vast improvement over my current specs.
Never underestimate a Resourceful Idiot
#24
-
- Member
-
- 3078 posts
The Hated
Posted 11 August 2006 - 09:51
Prophet of the Pimps, on 11 Aug 2006, 10:48, said:
Just waiting for my acer Ferrari Laptop to arrive soon. Sure it wont run everything on high specs bit it will be a vast improvement over my current specs.
Cool man, hope it impresses. ^-^
You'll only notice me when it's too late.
#25
-
- Member
-
- 1293 posts
Needled 24/7
Posted 15 August 2006 - 22:24
I don't think my system will be able to run it on high detail, but it may have a fighting chance to run it.
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 at 2.40GHz
RAM: 1,536MB DDR SDRAM PC2100
Video: Sapphire ATi Radeon 9600 Pro 256MB AGP
Oh, and an 80GB hard drive. Space isn't an issue for that. I know Zero Hour isn't the greatest looking game but I can run it on high detail, with everything enabled, full particles and all. Also my card is set to have AA and AF on. So for as crappy as the Sage engine is for Zero Hour, it doesn't look half bad.
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 at 2.40GHz
RAM: 1,536MB DDR SDRAM PC2100
Video: Sapphire ATi Radeon 9600 Pro 256MB AGP
Oh, and an 80GB hard drive. Space isn't an issue for that. I know Zero Hour isn't the greatest looking game but I can run it on high detail, with everything enabled, full particles and all. Also my card is set to have AA and AF on. So for as crappy as the Sage engine is for Zero Hour, it doesn't look half bad.
Thanks to that awesome signature maker, Cattman2236.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
