

Top 10 Combat Rifles
#1
Posted 17 November 2006 - 21:40
10. M-14
9. STG-44
8. 1903 Springfield
7. Steyr AUG
6. Kar 98K
5. FN FAL
4. M-1 Garand
3. SMLE (short magazine lee-enfield)
2. M-16
1. AK-47
Feel free to dispute any of these as well as say your opinion on whwat should be on there that ain't, and what is on there that shouldn't be. BTW, the ones that ALMOST made the top ten according to the show were the FAMAS, L85, and Mosin Nagant. I'll add my opinions on there soon, but i will wait for others to post first.

#2
Posted 17 November 2006 - 22:16
Nothing could ever beat an AK.
Kalashnikov is a genius.

#3
Posted 17 November 2006 - 23:30

Ion Cannon in IRC said:
#4
Posted 18 November 2006 - 00:01

#6
Posted 18 November 2006 - 00:20
Now then, where's the G-36 and G-3?
#7
Posted 18 November 2006 - 01:30
AK-47 is the Overrated and Overused Assault Rifle ever.
Why not G-36?

#9
Posted 18 November 2006 - 01:50
The M16 excels in some situations where the AK fails. It all depends on the circumstances.
#10
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:05
TBA, on 18 Nov 2006, 12:50, said:
The M16 excels in some situations where the AK fails. It all depends on the circumstances.
The M16 excels at all situations except combat.
Whereas the AK, it is cheap, easy to reload, lighter... etc.
Edited by Alias, 18 November 2006 - 02:05.

#11
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:14
#12
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:24

#13
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:27

Ion Cannon in IRC said:
#14
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:30
But they both work. You know why? It depends on who's using them. The AK is an excellent weapon to arm thousands of conscripts and militia with, and some professional soldiers can use it skillfully too. But it isn't as elegant a weapon as the M-16 and M-4 which despite both being very sensitive to abuse, are excellent combat weapons in their own right.
Also the G36 is basically an improved M-16 and the G3 isn't much different from the FAL except for a roller delayed operation.
Edited by AllStarZ, 18 November 2006 - 02:31.
#15
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:34
G-36 was improved than M-16 or M4, US army would to replace old rifles to XM8 by G-36 design, also in Mexico replaced G-3 to FX-05 ( better than G-36) just wiki it, in Argentina, i don´t know, they still have FN FAL, and other countries.

#16
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:35
Edited by BillyChaka, 18 November 2006 - 02:35.

Ion Cannon in IRC said:
#17
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:40

#18
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:50

Ion Cannon in IRC said:
#19
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:59

Edited by Elezzzark, 18 November 2006 - 03:00.

#20
Posted 18 November 2006 - 02:59
#21
Posted 18 November 2006 - 03:25
Elezzzark, on 17 Nov 2006, 21:59, said:

Sorry to get down on you... but the G-3 doesn't have that much in commmon with the STG, the original G-3 was basically the Spanish CETME (which is SOMEWHAT based off of the STG, but then again, so is every assault rifle ever made lol), then they added roller delay other great stuff like that. And what do you know, it becomes the best selling european made rifle, outselling the FN FAL. Which for all you gun junkies should know is a huge irony since originally Germany wanted to copy the FAL, but Belgians still felt hatred from WWII, and they rejected, so Germans went to the Spanish CETME, and it turns out the G-3 did better than the FAL in sales. Anyways... soo many posts in so little time, so may posts to reply to at once... This is why the M-16 fails, it's inreliable, period. That's the main failing, even with all the iprovements and even on the A2 and A4 varients, they still jam more than most other assault rifles. It's also very hard to strip down and clean. THe 5.56 round also has some hatred from me, would you rather wound or kill, most people that are morally correct would say wound, as then they are incapacitated, but still alive, and comrades must take care of him. Now, change one factor, make the opposition drugged with muscle stimulants, so they don't really feel the pain, wound or kill, if you say wound your totally stupid, as they just keep on fighting as they can't really 'feel' the pain that much. Anyways, what makes the G-3 so awesome, it's obviously not because it just gave way to the G36, it pioneered roller DELAY blowback, in otherwords, it delays the recoil, making it pretty insanely accurate, especially for a full-auto assault rifle using a 7.62x51mm NATO round. Now... why should th eG-36 be on there? Because it's one of the best combat rifles today, the only problem is it hasn't really been 'proven', so maybe not. But even though it uses a gas system, it still can be fitted wtih roller delay IIRC (from the HKPRO.com site) for a little bit more money, and it can be mounted with dual optics (one red dot, and one zoom sight, the zoom is like 3.5x and red dot is like 1.5x magnification) which is great for longer ranges and CQC. Anyways... It is highly based off of the AR-18 (the L85 is too) the AR-15 is an improved M-16 in alike, as the commercial designation for the M-16 is the AR-15 (armalite-15). Ak-47 is obviously going to be on top. Why wouldn't it be... It's probably the most reliable rifle the world has seen, it's easy to clean too, It has OKAY accuracy (it's good enough to kill at 100 meters in other words) and is very deadly in the right hands, it also has a round with more stoppping power (although IIRC it is worse at penetrating armor than the NATO rounds). It also is the most widely produced Assault rifle EVER, and has caused the most deaths of any weapon or weapon system EVER. Anyways, I'm surprised so many people acknowledge th egreatness of the G-3, oh well, at least it means I have a sense of good weaponry lol.

#22
Posted 18 November 2006 - 06:58
#23
Posted 18 November 2006 - 07:44

And Yeah, The AK is a crude and heavy weapon but why did the vietnamese used and liked it? Its because its reliable...heck i once saw a show at discovery channel comparing the AK-47 and the M16 (M-4) the Vietnamese liked the AK-47 because its VERY Reliable...Hell they can even stash there AK-47's underwater and come back if needed and plus it totally pwned the US army because while the Soldiers can hide from trees, The vietnamese can just shoot the damn tree and hit the soldiers while the M16 (or m4) cant do shit, in the i was talking about (man thats was unforgettable


Sorry for talking shit again

Edited by Chris, 18 November 2006 - 07:53.
#25
Posted 18 November 2006 - 09:21

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users