←  Serial Spammers

Fallout Studios Forums

»

Rate teh Siggy!

Vaughan's Photo Vaughan 03 Aug 2009

8/10

Nice color scheme, might need some more shoppy goodness. It relies on the render too much. :o

~V.
Quote

TheDR's Photo TheDR 04 Aug 2009

The depth and effects are cool, must of taken a lot of tweaking. Its a bit let down because the main image looks a bit pixelated around the edges, but that might just be because of where its from.

8.8/10
Quote

Dr.Schwarzk0pf's Photo Dr.Schwarzk0pf 04 Aug 2009

10/10 i love it
Quote

Vaughan's Photo Vaughan 04 Aug 2009

7/10

Ahhh, I love Godzilla!

~V.
Quote

Nem's Photo Nem 06 Aug 2009

Great style, Poor quality. 6/10
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 17 Aug 2009

*Brings back to life*
Good quality, the cut around the edges doesn't look messy enough to be random damage, but doesn't look neat enough to show it's supposed to be there. 8/10
Quote

Pav:3d's Photo Pav:3d 17 Aug 2009

Nice, i love the bg, where is it from? (or the brushes u made it with or w/e)
Quote

E-713 Aegis's Photo E-713 Aegis 18 Aug 2009

Absolutely awesome! I love how the green contrasts with the rest of it. 9/10
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 18 Aug 2009

A simple sig, little more than a tweaked screenie tbh. Simple is often effective though - 6/10
Quote

E-713 Aegis's Photo E-713 Aegis 18 Aug 2009

lol, mine isn't even tweaked, I just haven't had anyone work on it yet.

As for yours, I'd say 7/10, I like the muted colors and such.
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 18 Aug 2009

The muted colours are there for a reason - there's something about that image that would surprise you :sly:
Quote

TheDR's Photo TheDR 18 Aug 2009

I like it, but its a little too big for my preferences. Also, the image in your sig is amazingly overused, but thats not a problem :P
Also, maybe the render in your avatar could do with a bit of saturation, so it matches the sig.

So i like the overall design, text, placement ect. but its feels like its overly large when it doesn't need to be. 7.5/10
Quote

Dr.Schwarzk0pf's Photo Dr.Schwarzk0pf 18 Aug 2009

97/100
Quote

Admiral Wesley's Photo Admiral Wesley 21 Aug 2009

8/10
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 16 Sep 2009

Not bad, but the image doesn't quite lend itself to that effect, you've lost too much of his head into the BG.

And before anyone says anything: I KNOW IT'S BIG!
Quote

Brad's Photo Brad 16 Sep 2009

ITS HUGE
Still though, I think the style and colour suit the render nicely, and the font is nothing but the best for that render and concept.
Its also a little simple, it only being a rectangle coloured with a gradient with a popout.
Still, very nice. I'd say... 9/10
Quote

ΓΛPTΘΓ's Photo ΓΛPTΘΓ 16 Sep 2009

text/10
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 16 Sep 2009

Blue/10

I'd give it 7/10 - the hair is too sharply cut off, and the text is too small for me.
Quote

CJ's Photo CJ 16 Sep 2009

8.88/10
I won't talk about the good sides as that would include almost everything so the bad points are :
- Hair rendering is choppy
- Too big D:
- Text is not well placed, it's too close to the top
Quote

BeefJeRKy's Photo BeefJeRKy 16 Sep 2009

Build sig nao! :D Right now its a 3/10 for a good quote but no sig image
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 17 Sep 2009

8/10

The cut for the bloke was rather epic, but the sig's borders aren't quite right and over/underlap, sadly.

Variation of old sig, hair is sorted, text is lowered now, btw
Quote

TheDR's Photo TheDR 17 Sep 2009

Wait, did you just rate your own sig? :sly:

Cut is really nice and overall sig, text, colour ect. are done well.
The only bit i dislike is that the render seems to be slightly faded near the bottom.

7/10, its nice simple sig.
Quote

Nem's Photo Nem 11 Oct 2009

Zomg awesome 8/10
Quote

Libains's Photo Libains 11 Oct 2009

View PostNem, on 12 Oct 2009, 0:22, said:

Zomg awesome 8/10


Nice and simple, my kind of sig. Maybe a little too much black on the right, and lack of a name is a little meh, but still ace. 8.5/10
Quote

Warbz's Photo Warbz 11 Oct 2009

9/10 background is a tad bland. Awesome cut though.
Edited by W!, 11 October 2009 - 23:27.
Quote