Chinese Artillery Cannon?
#1
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:22
Is this real? It looks too militaristic to be a ShW-created diagram.
48 65 6c 6c 6f 2c 20 77 6f 72 6c 64 21
#2
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:25
#5
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:28
@Mark: I have no idea what they call them but I can confirm it's real.
Edited by Zhen Ji, 30 May 2008 - 19:30.
#6
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:28
(Sig by The DR)
True beauty comes from heart and mind.
(but perfection has also big boobs)
#8
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:31
#9
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:38
Waris, on 30 May 2008, 20:31, said:
Contra uses this too unless that's what ShW's is based on since Creator/Hunter help in each others mods.
Does it really matter?I don't have a reason to lie also if you want to spend weaks clicking links that are in Chinese then well..You'll have a headache.
Edited by Zhen Ji, 30 May 2008 - 19:38.
#10
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:40
#11
Posted 30 May 2008 - 19:44
If it's real, it has to be one nasty piece of work. Kind of reminds me of those old railway-guns.
#13
Posted 31 May 2008 - 01:48
I do not intend to call anyone a liar, but given that the options are that this is actually a PLA document, in which case it would be top secret, or that it was a piece of non-military art, I'd go for the latter.
Quote
#14
Posted 31 May 2008 - 01:59
#15
Posted 31 May 2008 - 10:39
#16
Posted 31 May 2008 - 12:58
Edit - a quick search turned this up:
http://forum.cncreneclips.com/index.php?sh...\Evidently it wasn't done by the ShockWave team (I didn't think it was) but that still doesn't explain how a weapon concept with 'TOP SECRET' emblazoned across it in big letters ends up on a gaming forum if it's real.
Also, here's a quick translation of the page from the above thread:
"It uses a smooth barrel to fire a shell which flies at 1500m/s which triggers the pressure engine in the shell, the shell is propelled by several explosions inside the same barrel, going off in sequence as the projectile travels the length of the barrel. The principle for the subsequent explosions is the same as a ram jet engine, compression of air and an injection of flammable liquid. The shell is then propelled into the higher and less dense regions of the atmosphere. It has an accuracy of 250m. And the barrel corrects itself, due to the recoil, to the target after each shot.
Barrel size: 400mm
Shell size: 300mm
Warhead weight: 250 kg
Reload/Firing delay: 2 rounds/min
Range: 600 km
On the diagram besides the text on the top right hand corner:
It says in the first text box: "Enters flying course, glides/flies automatically and engages target."
Second: "Enters terminal velocity and the inner region of the atmosphere or something of that rather, engages air-compression engine, and adjusts course."
Third: "Enters the higher region of the atmosphere and the shell changes course."
Fourth: "Shell's re-entry prevents any loss of momentum and ensures the shell gains high velocity (as you can see the angle at which the shell enters)."
Cross-section of the shell:
Warhead: 1500~2000mm
Engine part of the shell which includes solid fuel and guidance system: 1000mm
Explosive charges which sets off inside the barrel to propel the projectile.
Warhead types:
HE
Bunker buster
Anti-ship
Nuclear
and under the heading of Nuclear: Shockwave, Radiation and Pressure?
Shell type:
Cluster missiles:
Anti-armour seekers
HEAT rounds
Napalm
Small low-Earth orbit satellite
Anti-satellite rounds?
Positions:
One with the shell visible: reloading
One with the barrel to the ground: firing."
Also, did you notice the cargo ship in the bottom left corner? I only just did. That thing looks like the container ship from hell!
Edited by CommanderJB, 31 May 2008 - 13:13.
Quote
#17
Posted 31 May 2008 - 21:00
#18
Posted 31 May 2008 - 21:44
#19
Posted 31 May 2008 - 22:29
FHSSFCS, on 31 May 2008, 17:44, said:
You wouldn't need this thing to hit Taiwan from China, I'm fairly sure more conventional artillery has that range.
#20
Posted 31 May 2008 - 23:21
Sharpnessism, on 31 May 2008, 15:29, said:
FHSSFCS, on 31 May 2008, 17:44, said:
You wouldn't need this thing to hit Taiwan from China, I'm fairly sure more conventional artillery has that range.
I know, but they'd become a propaganda tool since it's bigass and powerful. It can also attack other side of Taiwan without wasting BMs to attack it.
#22
Posted 31 May 2008 - 23:49
#23
Posted 04 June 2008 - 01:39
As for FHSSFCS, what is your problem with taiwan? You sound like you want China to completely obliterate the entire country.
Bored? Need something to occupy yourself? Well then visit this website for a good time.
My Favorite Suggestion for Shockwave from Soho
Thanks to -Drag- for my sig!
#24
Posted 04 June 2008 - 04:50
Evilgmk, on 4 Jun 2008, 2:39, said:
That matter has been dealt with by the staff, please continue without drawing politics onto the forum.
Taiwan is a hot topic and something that's not fit for a gamer's board, let alone the warfare section thereof.
#25
Posted 04 June 2008 - 06:36
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users