Fallout Studios Forums

Vietnam? Korea? a bunch of other wars that aint in 21st century?

WORLD WAR FUCKING ONE.

There has never been a good FPS for this time.

Wouldnt that get incredibly repetetive?

*okay boys, the mission today is simple, go over the top and kill all the germans*

Followed by really REALLY bad tank driving levels.

Game ends when you get mustard gas in your face

Alias, on 29 Mar 2009, 16:56, said:

Everyone says that would be boring. I would like for someone to TRY an FPS in said setting. Battle of Gallipoli, Battle of Verdun, Battle of the Somme. There are quite a few scenarions to try. If even IW can't make a good WWI game then we can know for sure that there is no hope for that era of time.

Pav3d, on 29 Mar 2009, 23:00, said:

with the "infinite enemy respawn till you enter the house" system of COD i dont see the problem, in fact it will be pretty much the same, only different weapons and scenarios

First of all I would like to say how great the teaser was, it was very well done. And i'm sure that however they plan to make it and whatever scenario it is, the game will be made of win- Infinity Ward Win.

An Australian games show pointed out that this one actually doesn't have 'Call of Duty' attached to it. Seems Modern Warfare will become its own franchise.

TehKiller, on 30 Mar 2009, 6:19, said:

1. Wasn't there a lot of Vietnam FPSes already?
2. Korean War = WW2 equipment + early jet fighters + shitty helicopters. Not that much different from WW2 tbh.

Pav3d, on 30 Mar 2009, 6:30, said:

LOL

hmmm

"SIR, A7V at 12 o'clock!!!"

"our weapons can't hit it dammit! damn sponsons!"

(press up + down to disengage tank from muddy terrain with lever plank)

Modern warfare for the win. i'm interested in the actual factions

yea, there have been a lot of vietnam FPSs, none of em done right

I am hoping for lots of new weapons, and better weapon balance. I wanna see bullpup infinity ward! Dont be haters!

ultimentra, on 7 Apr 2009, 4:31, said:

MW had a bullpup too. Look at what came out of that.

(and bullpups look fugly )
Edited by Chyros, 07 April 2009 - 10:54.

what bullpup was in MW?

My memory is a bit hazy (haven't played COD4 for many months), but the P90 is, isn't it?

umm not dachamp, on 7 Apr 2009, 16:36, said:

Alias, on 7 Apr 2009, 16:42, said:

Yeah.

Well you ppl want bullpup assault rifles not PDW's that arent really counted as bullpup's

TehKiller, on 7 Apr 2009, 20:48, said:

A bullpup design places the trigger in front of the magazine, that's all. A PDW is a submachine gun with small, armour-piercing rounds. The two criteria have nothing to do with each other, let alone conflict .

That said, I'd really like to see an AUG in MW2. That weapon has lots of fun possibilities .
Edited by Chyros, 07 April 2009 - 19:56.

P90's mag isnt really that infront of the trigger... and I still imply ppl want bullpup rifles not OPed PDW's

i usually dont even like the guns that seem really OPed (P90, M16, and MP40 in WaW)

but i hope they fix them, cause im sick of people using the same 2 guns all the time

All this chat about COD4 is bringing back fine memories of cursing 6 year olds running around on COD 4 with Juggarnaut and M16's with Noob tubes as I was being gunned down by a P90 from across the map.

I really can't say i have seen much of the P90 on xbox live, usually its M4 red dot and stopping power.

ON the PC version there is a total bunch of noobs using either a silenced P90 (with all those stealth perks) or a ACOG with stopping power and deep impact

its been a while since ive played xbox live, but that is what i remember (all p90s and m16s)

i can say that i loved the m16, but i didnt overuse it, and i always hated the p90, just seemed like a weaker mp5 with a couple more bullets
Edited by umm not dachamp, 15 April 2009 - 17:06.

idk P90 to me looked like a stronger MP5 with (almost) twice as much ammo. M16 is a bit retardedly accurate seeing that you can land headshots like Arnie did in Terminator

They should also add in the H&K 416 to replace the M4.

The fact that this game will be set in the near future means that most armies should've wised up by then and started to phase in better weapons.

Proof that the M4 is a piece of turd:


Edited by deltaepsilon, 16 April 2009 - 03:40.