142 replies to this topic

[Sgt. Rho]

Well that looks fucking awesome.

[Alias]

Not a fan of the aircraft, but good to see that iconic parts of Generals like the technical (and the voice ) are staying.

[CJ]

As long as they keep the GLA worker lines, I'm fine with whatever futuristic vehicles they put in there

Can I have some shoes?

[Sgt. Rho]

What's wrong with the aircraft? DC helicopters have been arond since the 60s or 50s even.

[Chyros]

Sgt. Rho, on 03 April 2012 - 15:35, said:

What's wrong with the aircraft? DC helicopters have been arond since the 60s or 50s even.

And they still look like shit. I'm with Alias, it doesn't appeal to me at all.

[General]

CJ, on 03 April 2012 - 15:07, said:

As long as they keep the GLA worker lines, I'm fine with whatever futuristic vehicles they put in there

Can I have some shoes?

Let me build Palace & Black Market first
Ineed, I cannot see a Generals without GLA and some classic figures such as workers and scud launcher, or atleast something similiar if not exactly the same.

Hell, I will be happy with THE SAME Generals with new generation graphics...

[TheDR]

Well to be honest the aircraft doesn't look that interesting.

However, I take that as a good sign. USA in generals was always the generic high tech faction, I don't think it should be any different in the squeal. GLA and China (are they in?) can be the flavour and USA can be the benchmark of reality.

[Alias]

General, on 03 April 2012 - 16:50, said:

CJ, on 03 April 2012 - 15:07, said:

As long as they keep the GLA worker lines, I'm fine with whatever futuristic vehicles they put in there

Can I have some shoes?

Let me build Palace & Black Market first
Ineed, I cannot see a Generals without GLA and some classic figures such as workers and scud launcher, or atleast something similiar if not exactly the same.

Hell, I will be happy with THE SAME Generals with new generation graphics...

Well, the thing that made Generals truly a great game was the ease of modification - along with a selection of great modmakers creating content for it.

I would prefer if it was a remake with a few extra features, but unfortunately due to their current engine setup, it's going to be either extremely hard to mod or impossible.

[Raven]

I like the missile firing animation. It looks cool. I don't think US is a faction.Its more like EU I guess.

[Slye_Fox]

I'm going to wait till I see some gameplay footage before making any judgments.

[Soul]

If that CGI is anything to go by, the cutsences are going to be wicked at least

[General]

Soul, on 04 April 2012 - 13:57, said:

If that CGI is anything to go by, the cutsences are going to be wicked at least

We need plenty of CGI, at beginning, between each mission and at the end!

[Chyros]

General, on 04 April 2012 - 15:33, said:

Soul, on 04 April 2012 - 13:57, said:

If that CGI is anything to go by, the cutsences are going to be wicked at least

We need plenty of CGI, at beginning, between each mission and at the end!

Hopefully with real actors. IMO that was always one of the strengths of the CnC franchise.

[General]

Chyros, on 04 April 2012 - 16:37, said:

General, on 04 April 2012 - 15:33, said:

Soul, on 04 April 2012 - 13:57, said:

If that CGI is anything to go by, the cutsences are going to be wicked at least

We need plenty of CGI, at beginning, between each mission and at the end!

Hopefully with real actors. IMO that was always one of the strengths of the CnC franchise.

NOt if it is like Red Alert 3's, it was like a show prepared for children.

[Anubis]

I just hope they at least keep the secondary econ system. That was one of the coolest parts in generals that allowed for a much greater variety of strategies and not just rush rush rush like in every game that has a highly limited economy. I also wish they would not do the same shit they keep doing since dragon age 2 (and mass effect 3) - give the shitiest most genericaly retarded ending and decide to MAYBE put an actual ending in a DLC. If shit goes like this in 5 years at most we will start to buy games mission by mission. And i also wish they would stop using shity sexuality in all the cgi/game characters so much to attract pre-pubic hair kids with bags of hormons for balls. Im not interested in seeing huge ass/tits in cinematics but more action (i prefer to see those in real frekin life).

Edited by Anubis, 04 April 2012 - 19:01.

[n5p29]

Chyros, on 04 April 2012 - 16:37, said:

General, on 04 April 2012 - 15:33, said:

Soul, on 04 April 2012 - 13:57, said:

If that CGI is anything to go by, the cutsences are going to be wicked at least

We need plenty of CGI, at beginning, between each mission and at the end!

Hopefully with real actors. IMO that was always one of the strengths of the CnC franchise.

how about mix of both?
real actors with CGI environments maybe? or the CGI characters are 3D version of the real actors?

[Chyros]

n5p29, on 05 April 2012 - 10:05, said:

Chyros, on 04 April 2012 - 16:37, said:

General, on 04 April 2012 - 15:33, said:

Soul, on 04 April 2012 - 13:57, said:

If that CGI is anything to go by, the cutsences are going to be wicked at least

We need plenty of CGI, at beginning, between each mission and at the end!

Hopefully with real actors. IMO that was always one of the strengths of the CnC franchise.

how about mix of both?
real actors with CGI environments maybe?

IIRC all CnC clips were recorded on a bluescreen so that's kind of already the case.

[Sgt. Rho]

Greenscreen actually