Pics of yourself
#3304
Posted 09 September 2010 - 09:33
Umbrella Secrets, on 9 Sep 2010, 7:22, said:
You also might see a giant hand on the camera and chaos in the classroom.
It looks like your about to get back handed.
I question the general assumption that i am inherently deficient in the area of grammar and sentence structure
#3305
Posted 09 September 2010 - 11:33
Chyros, on 9 Sep 2010, 5:23, said:
My hair's never been that long, ever oO .
If my hair was straight (which thankfully it isn't) my fringe would be probably reach my collarbone.
Edited by Alias, 09 September 2010 - 11:34.
#3306
Posted 10 September 2010 - 23:15
Don't ask.
#3308
Posted 10 September 2010 - 23:58
Also, Wiz, I think it may be either the camera angle or hypermobility syndrome .
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#3309
Posted 11 September 2010 - 00:11
#3310
Posted 11 September 2010 - 10:30
Sitting in my cab waiting for two Woolworth's trucks to get off the the one dock and i had just finished reading a Hustler and got bored so i decided to take a photo.
I question the general assumption that i am inherently deficient in the area of grammar and sentence structure
#3311
Posted 12 September 2010 - 21:11
Wizard, on 11 Sep 2010, 2:28, said:
I can do the same thing he's doing. It isn't that difficult.
also not exactly s picture of me but this happened yesterday. no injuries thankfully
thankfully we have all risk insurance. not to mention that the guy who hit me had no license yet :S
also his Toyota Yaris was in far worse condition.
#3312
Posted 12 September 2010 - 22:00
scope, on 12 Sep 2010, 22:11, said:
Glad to see that the incident isn't serious, but do you mind if I can be pedantic for a moment? When you say "risk insurance", is it a local phrase for description of an "all risks" or "comprehensive" form of car insurance, because otherwise it's a rather pointless waste of a word because insurance IS risk, it's sorta of implicit in the definition. /work geek
#3313
Posted 12 September 2010 - 22:23
And well, glad you're okay Scope
#3314
Posted 12 September 2010 - 22:38
Wizard, on 13 Sep 2010, 1:00, said:
scope, on 12 Sep 2010, 22:11, said:
Glad to see that the incident isn't serious, but do you mind if I can be pedantic for a moment? When you say "risk insurance", is it a local phrase for description of an "all risks" or "comprehensive" form of car insurance, because otherwise it's a rather pointless waste of a word because insurance IS risk, it's sorta of implicit in the definition. /work geek
all insurance companies use french terms so i didnt give much thought into translating that bit
I guess comprehensive fits better
#3317
Posted 18 September 2010 - 12:53
F O R T H E N S
#3318
Posted 19 September 2010 - 19:40
I heard you liek close-ups?
Took this with my Lumix G1 and its kit lens attached. ISO 400, f-stop 5.6, and shutter speed of 1/10s (my brother's hand is pretty steady plus OIS helps). In Lightroom I did a bit of sharpening, tweaked exposure, B&W filter and some minor vignetting and film grain.
#3319
Posted 19 September 2010 - 20:30
The brave hide behind technology. The stupid hide from it. The clever have technology, and hide it.
—The Book of Cataclysm
#3321
Posted 19 September 2010 - 21:41
scope, on 19 Sep 2010, 19:40, said:
I heard you liek close-ups?
Took this with my Lumix G1 and its kit lens attached. ISO 400, f-stop 5.6, and shutter speed of 1/10s (my brother's hand is pretty steady plus OIS helps). In Lightroom I did a bit of sharpening, tweaked exposure, B&W filter and some minor vignetting and film grain.
it's still a shaky picture though...
#3323
Posted 19 September 2010 - 22:13
scope, on 19 Sep 2010, 21:46, said:
and quadrupled your dirty digital grain...
unless your resolution is so high that you can shrink the image back so no one will notice.
#3324
Posted 19 September 2010 - 22:23
Camille, on 20 Sep 2010, 1:13, said:
scope, on 19 Sep 2010, 21:46, said:
and quadrupled your dirty digital grain...
unless your resolution is so high that you can shrink the image back so no one will notice.
12mp and some denoize algorithms can help. not to mention in B&W, it wouldn't be too bad
#3325
Posted 19 September 2010 - 23:14
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users