#220451
Posted 17 August 2012 - 16:10
#220452
Posted 17 August 2012 - 16:15
Kyle Carter said:
#220453
Posted 17 August 2012 - 16:32
F O R T H E N S
#220454
Posted 17 August 2012 - 16:35
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 16:10, said:
I doubt you'd be able to make a modern looking UI without images though (I'm thinking of diagonal gradients and glass/glow effects on buttons for example)
Thanks for the infos though, I didn't actually look into webdesign for about 4-5 years, and it was only basic stuff I've done back then. Now that I'm thinking about helping a few friends to make a site I'm kinda lost
#220455
Posted 17 August 2012 - 18:10
#220456
Posted 17 August 2012 - 18:18
Kyle Carter said:
#220457
Posted 17 August 2012 - 18:22
#220458
Posted 17 August 2012 - 18:33
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 15:47, said:
Ugh.
Illustrator is an awful bit of software for designing website. I think there are some modes for designing websites, but all the designs that have come to us in Illustrator have taken at least twice as long to make, because it's such a pain the arse to get any useful information from Illustrator. Nothing is in pixels, and no hex codes. D:
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 15:47, said:
Depends if you're supporting IE6 or not.
#220459
Posted 17 August 2012 - 18:46
Bob, on 17 August 2012 - 18:33, said:
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 15:47, said:
Ugh.
Illustrator is an awful bit of software for designing website. I think there are some modes for designing websites, but all the designs that have come to us in Illustrator have taken at least twice as long to make, because it's such a pain the arse to get any useful information from Illustrator. Nothing is in pixels, and no hex codes. D:
In Illustrator you can set dimensions to pixels, you can snap to pixels, you can tell it to render in pixels and you can also view colours perfectly fine in hex.
Just because you're uninformed and don't know how to do it doesn't mean the software is the problem. In most cases, especially these days with the great increase in resolutions, designing in Illustrator makes far more sense than Photoshop – Fireworks is a special case but really it does vector worse than Illustrator and raster worse than Photoshop, so I tend to prefer just using the packages that suit the purpose.
Fireworks was shoehorned in from the Macromedia era. It really should've just been killed off.
Bob, on 17 August 2012 - 18:33, said:
#220460
Posted 17 August 2012 - 19:04
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 18:46, said:
Bob, on 17 August 2012 - 18:33, said:
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 15:47, said:
Ugh.
Illustrator is an awful bit of software for designing website. I think there are some modes for designing websites, but all the designs that have come to us in Illustrator have taken at least twice as long to make, because it's such a pain the arse to get any useful information from Illustrator. Nothing is in pixels, and no hex codes. D:
In Illustrator you can set dimensions to pixels, you can snap to pixels, you can tell it to render in pixels and you can also view colours perfectly fine in hex.
Just because you're uninformed and don't know how to do it doesn't mean the software is the problem. In most cases, especially these days with the great increase in resolutions, designing in Illustrator makes far more sense than Photoshop – Fireworks is a special case but really it does vector worse than Illustrator and raster worse than Photoshop, so I tend to prefer just using the packages that suit the purpose.
Fireworks was shoehorned in from the Macromedia era. It really should've just been killed off.
Wait... I'm getting mixed up here. I'm thinking of InDesign, not Illustrator. Illustrator is fine, I used for a while when I was dabbling with making stock vector images. InDesign is the devils work.
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 18:46, said:
Bob, on 17 August 2012 - 18:33, said:
It depends who your target audience is. If it's a corporate website, then it's quite likely there will be IE6 users.
CJ, on 17 August 2012 - 16:35, said:
Alias, on 17 August 2012 - 16:10, said:
I doubt you'd be able to make a modern looking UI without images though (I'm thinking of diagonal gradients and glass/glow effects on buttons for example)
Thanks for the infos though, I didn't actually look into webdesign for about 4-5 years, and it was only basic stuff I've done back then. Now that I'm thinking about helping a few friends to make a site I'm kinda lost
You can do that through a combination of gradients, box-shadows, and some basic CSS.
#220461
Posted 17 August 2012 - 19:16
Kyle Carter said:
#220463
Posted 17 August 2012 - 22:00
F O R T H E N S
#220464
Posted 17 August 2012 - 22:45
#220465
Posted 17 August 2012 - 22:55
F O R T H E N S
#220466
Posted 17 August 2012 - 23:07
I question the general assumption that i am inherently deficient in the area of grammar and sentence structure
#220468
Posted 18 August 2012 - 00:12
F O R T H E N S
#220469
#220471
Posted 18 August 2012 - 02:58
#220472
Posted 18 August 2012 - 04:38
Sareen said:
#220473
#220474
Posted 18 August 2012 - 07:17
Edited by Alias, 18 August 2012 - 07:17.
#220475
Posted 18 August 2012 - 07:21
Okayyy
Kyle Carter said:
88 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 88 guests, 0 anonymous users