324124 replies to this topic

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

Huh?

[CJ]

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

[General]

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

I've seen more retarded arguments than this of course but still what you just said deserves its own place among top retarded stuff list
Well, All FPS games basically same aswell, but only a dozen or so of them good and rest is shit. RTS games same aswell, you click to unit or press to hotkey button or fuckever you wish and they move somewhere or attack something. What differs them is the models, animations and sounds... And DOW2 suits to my tastes a lot better than same old WW2 crap.

[Alias]

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

It's a strategy game, you don't really remember it for the campaign, you remember it for the multiplayer.

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

[CJ]

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Would you say that CoH is shit just because it's missing the base building though?

BTW, the only CoH game I bothered to play in multiplayer was CoH Online, and that one did have base building in it D:

[Alias]

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:41, said:

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Would you say that CoH is shit just because it's missing the base building though?

BTW, the only CoH game I bothered to play in multiplayer was CoH Online, and that one did have base building in it D:

I'm talking about DOW2, you said it's exactly the same as COH, where in fact it is very different in several marked differences.


...

Edited by Alias, 20 April 2013 - 12:46.

[General]

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

It's a strategy game, you don't really remember it for the campaign, you remember it for the multiplayer.

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Yes, victory points works so good on DOW2 and suits to the gameplay style a lot better. Focusing on different parts of the map and trying to manage units instead of moving your unit spams to destroy enemy base is more interesting.

Edited by General, 20 April 2013 - 12:47.

[CJ]

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:45, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:41, said:

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Would you say that CoH is shit just because it's missing the base building though?

BTW, the only CoH game I bothered to play in multiplayer was CoH Online, and that one did have base building in it D:

I'm talking about DOW2, you said it's exactly the same as COH, where in fact it is very different in several marked differences.


...

Ah well, that explains a lot, I was confused when I read it as "CoH doesn't have base building"

[Alias]

General, on 20 April 2013 - 12:46, said:

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

It's a strategy game, you don't really remember it for the campaign, you remember it for the multiplayer.

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Yes, victory points works so good on DOW2 and suits to the gameplay style a lot better. Focusing on different parts of the map and trying to manage units instead of moving your unit spams to destroy enemy base is more interesting.

I don't think you quite understand how COH multiplayer (or gameplay in general) actually works. :|

Yes, you build a base. But very rarely will you ever assault it. There really isn't unit spam either, DOW/DOW2 both have a higher pop cap. COH is far more strategic and tactical for several reasons that you really only start to see when you spend a lot of time in it.

[General]

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:51, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 12:46, said:

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

It's a strategy game, you don't really remember it for the campaign, you remember it for the multiplayer.

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Yes, victory points works so good on DOW2 and suits to the gameplay style a lot better. Focusing on different parts of the map and trying to manage units instead of moving your unit spams to destroy enemy base is more interesting.

I don't think you quite understand how COH multiplayer (or gameplay in general) actually works. :|

Yes, you build a base. But very rarely will you ever assault it. There really isn't unit spam either, DOW/DOW2 both have a higher pop cap. COH is far more strategic and tactical for several reasons that you really only start to see when you spend a lot of time in it.

But still, I've certain dislike on WW2 themed games, perhaps playing lots of COD and Medal of Honor on PS1 bored me to death Instead of doing the same shit with improved graphics, if they done modern day story with COH2, it would be cool.

[Alias]

General, on 20 April 2013 - 13:15, said:

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:51, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 12:46, said:

Alias, on 20 April 2013 - 12:36, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

It's a strategy game, you don't really remember it for the campaign, you remember it for the multiplayer.

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 12:19, said:

General, on 20 April 2013 - 07:05, said:

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 05:24, said:

I didn't even bother to finish CoH and its expansions yet, but all I can say is that General went full retard indeed.

Care to explain why ?

Why would I bother explaining it when you're obviously very set on the idea that CoH is shit, even though you like a game that is basically the same as it, but with different unit models and names?

Not exactly, it has the best parts of the gameplay gone as well.

Like, you know, base building.

However, the stuff General mentioned he did like, particularly the whole Victory Point thing, is directly lifted from COH.

Yes, victory points works so good on DOW2 and suits to the gameplay style a lot better. Focusing on different parts of the map and trying to manage units instead of moving your unit spams to destroy enemy base is more interesting.

I don't think you quite understand how COH multiplayer (or gameplay in general) actually works. :|

Yes, you build a base. But very rarely will you ever assault it. There really isn't unit spam either, DOW/DOW2 both have a higher pop cap. COH is far more strategic and tactical for several reasons that you really only start to see when you spend a lot of time in it.

But still, I've certain dislike on WW2 themed games, perhaps playing lots of COD and Medal of Honor on PS1 bored me to death Instead of doing the same shit with improved graphics, if they done modern day story with COH2, it would be cool.

I dislike most WW2 games as well, but the gameplay of COH is good enough that you can just avoid the setting and focus on the game.

[Chyros]

Base building doesn't have to be in the game for it to be a good RTS, just look at Z .

[General]

Chyros, on 20 April 2013 - 13:35, said:

Base building doesn't have to be in the game for it to be a good RTS, just look at Dawn of War 2 .

Fixed

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

Game Discussion

Just throwing that out there.

[General]

Bob, on 20 April 2013 - 14:00, said:

Game Discussion

Just throwing that out there.

This is no place for such propositions.

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

|:

[Destiny]

XD

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

:@

[Destiny]

No!!

[CJ]

Bob, on 20 April 2013 - 14:00, said:

Game Discussion

Just throwing that out there.

Haven't given up hope yet, have ya? =o

[Slightly Wonky Robob]

:(

[TheDR]

It doesn't make much sense posting about CoH here when discussion elsewhere would still warrant comments and reply's.

[CJ]

It wouldn't really, just like any other topic outside LPTPW, It is likely to be posted in once or twice, with everyone realizing that everyone else is clinging to their own opinion, and it'll fall into in the "read posts abyss", 'til someone necroes it 2 years after to post about an update/mod/something else concerning the game D:!

SUCH IS LIFE IN FALLOUT

[General]

TheDR, on 20 April 2013 - 15:53, said:

It doesn't make much sense posting about CoH here when discussion elsewhere would still warrant comments and reply's.

[Chyros]

CJ, on 20 April 2013 - 16:01, said:

It wouldn't really, just like any other topic outside LPTPW, It is likely to be posted in once or twice, with everyone realizing that everyone else is clinging to their own opinion, and it'll fall into in the "read posts abyss", 'til someone necroes it 2 years after to post about an update/mod/something else concerning the game D:!

SUCH IS LIFE IN FALLOUT

THE HORROR