

Wow, Empire Earth II really does suck...
#1
Posted 01 August 2007 - 22:09
Probably the most average RTS game I've played of recent years. It looks bad. The interface is horrible. The 15 epochs are hardly different from each other. Seriously, there's absolutely no reason I'd want to play this game...
Steer away, gamers.
Masonicon, on 17 Oct 2009, 13:44, said:
#2
Posted 01 August 2007 - 22:24

#4
Posted 01 August 2007 - 23:33
I played it some time aswell, its quite nice.
- E.V.E.

#5
Posted 01 August 2007 - 23:52
#8
Posted 02 August 2007 - 00:59
Empire Earth II is basically generic gameplay done really poorly. Try Age of Empires without the tactics, and with 1990s 3d graphics and poor performance.
Masonicon, on 17 Oct 2009, 13:44, said:
#9
Posted 02 August 2007 - 04:08
Two games almost exactly like it:
Age of Empires III
Empire: Dawn of the Modern World
#10
Posted 02 August 2007 - 05:59
Grim Reaper, on 2 Aug 2007, 14:08, said:
Two games almost exactly like it:
Age of Empires III
Empire: Dawn of the Modern World
Apart from the fact Empires: DotMW is tenfold better than EE2.

#12
Posted 02 August 2007 - 06:41
I bought quite a lot of games in my time and EE2 is one of the only two games I hated. I regret having bought them. The other one is Rainbow Six Lockdown for the PC, shit graphics, ass gameplay and on top of that, it's Starforce infested. Now that I mention it, I think that I'll go out and throw it into the dustbin because I can't stand the look at this pathetic waste of 40€.
#13
Posted 02 August 2007 - 06:54

Oh and PotP, I'm still staring in disbelief at the reviews of 8 and 8.9 on Gamespot and IGN. What were those people on?
Edited by RaiDK, 02 August 2007 - 07:09.
Masonicon, on 17 Oct 2009, 13:44, said:
#14
Posted 02 August 2007 - 09:26
Alias, on 2 Aug 2007, 5:59, said:
Grim Reaper, on 2 Aug 2007, 14:08, said:
Two games almost exactly like it:
Age of Empires III
Empire: Dawn of the Modern World
Apart from the fact Empires: DotMW is tenfold better than EE2.
and its alot older than EE2

#15
Posted 02 August 2007 - 10:26
#16
Posted 02 August 2007 - 11:26
becease Sweden wasnt included!
that,s retarded
Sweden was a great power at that era,
Even though most off the game took place in america why would Ottomans be included?
Sweden had a colony
Ottonams had none
The expansion just made the indian factions playable
Im realy pissed off by this game
Seriously
WHY Does everybody hate Sweden!!
Same thing with total war meievial 2
They put in Denmark bt not Sweden!
It,s like the cold war without USA!
Denmark and Sweden are The CLASSIC Enimes at that era!
Sweden wasnt even in the expansion!
better hope thay put in Sweden in a Renissance Total war
if they ever do one
#17
Posted 02 August 2007 - 12:29

#18
Posted 02 August 2007 - 12:45
Edited by Rayburn, 02 August 2007 - 12:46.
#19
Posted 02 August 2007 - 13:17

#20
Posted 02 August 2007 - 16:18
im not an expert on that period
but
http://en.wikipedia....story_of_Sweden
#21
Posted 02 August 2007 - 17:41
#22
Posted 02 August 2007 - 17:57

#24
Posted 02 August 2007 - 18:08
Nightshadow, on 2 Aug 2007, 19:41, said:
I've played a wide variety of different RTSes, from the CnC series to EEI and II, AoE and AoEII, AoM, Outpost2, Anno 1503, the Settlers series..... And I say EEII sucks ballz. Heck, they didn't even name the friggin' epochs like they did in the prequel.
#25
Posted 02 August 2007 - 18:21
Edited by Rayburn, 02 August 2007 - 20:37.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users