885 replies to this topic

[Sgt. Rho]

Yep. The Nod sniper will be stealthed however.

[Destiny]

Hmm I see, I hope they'd have a long enough range/high enough ROF to keep them out of trouble. Also:

Sargeant Rho, on 17 Oct 2010, 20:23, said:

I don't know how to make the beam fade, since it's a model

Maybe you could add the stealth effect to it like how units slowly fade away in the presence of a Disruption tower.

[Sgt. Rho]

that isn't an FX, the stealth update does that.

[Raven]

A Nod sniper. I like the sound of it. I always thought that a sniper would fit the Nods style of play much more than GDI's.

Grenadiers can still clear garrisoned buildings right?

[Sgt. Rho]

Yes, a grenade clears all garrisoned infantry, while a round of the sniper only clears out one unit/one squad member.

[Admiral FCS]

Wait......why are grenadiers more effective against vehicles now? Shouldn't grenade actually do more damage to infantry instead of vehicles and buildings?

[Sgt. Rho]

Because of TS. I'm trying to get the unit values closer to TS.

Also the grenades are getting replaced with discs, eventually.

[Raven]

Diskies were one of my fav infantry units from TS. I usually take 10-15 of em when playing the campaign .

[BeefJeRKy]

Sgt. Rho, on 8 Jan 2011, 2:34, said:

Because of TS. I'm trying to get the unit values closer to TS.

Also the grenades are getting replaced with discs, eventually.

Aww but the Rugby grenades was one of the cooler TW ideas

[Sgt. Rho]

Nod's newest Toy: The "Hammer of Mercy" Heavy Artillery. The name is supposed to be kind of ironic btw.

Edited by Sgt. Rho, 10 January 2011 - 05:43.

[Pav:3d]

Looks great, tho shouldnt it have more support leg things?

[Wizard]

I like the unit, but it doesn't seem very "Nod-ish" to me.

[Sgt. Rho]

Pav:3d, on 10 Jan 2011, 14:25, said:

Looks great, tho shouldnt it have more support leg things?

It has 2 Pylons on the rear, 2 on the sides, and a huge pylon in front...what more could I add?

Wizard, on 10 Jan 2011, 14:28, said:

I like the unit, but it doesn't seem very "Nod-ish" to me.

Sticking to TS-Nod style, not TW Nod.

[Wizard]

Sgt. Rho, on 10 Jan 2011, 14:29, said:

Wizard, on 10 Jan 2011, 14:28, said:

I like the unit, but it doesn't seem very "Nod-ish" to me.

Sticking to TS-Nod style, not TW Nod.

Furry Muff

[Destiny]

Does the barrel recoil after shooting?

[Sgt. Rho]

All the length of the Springs in fact.

[Camille]

Sgt. Rho, on 10 Jan 2011, 17:05, said:

All the length of the Springs in fact.

it's that rad!

the unit looks good though a bit unbalanced in my opinion.

[Raven]

Does it function similar to the specter in KW?

[Sgt. Rho]

No, it functions like Nod's artillery in TS.

[Sgt. Rho]

[Raven]

That's bloody awesome . Why the green paint flick at the back? It does not match IMO.

[Sgt. Rho]

That was supposed to be the glow from the Tiberium powecores...

[Destiny]

Hmm, think it's possible to make them fire actual shells instead of...well...energy balls?

[Sgt. Rho]

fireballs look more fancy and futurey

[Sgt. Rho]

I've redesigned most of the Buggy's front now, and made the Turret larger.