

Rise of the Reds Recruitment Station N34
#101
Posted 17 February 2009 - 00:04
Well I will discuss some more with JB but we are prepared to perhaps level the field a bit to begin with at say 1-3 multipliers, however, isn't there roughly the same statistical advantages if you play 3 units types at 5 RP vs 2 unit types at 6RP each with a possible 1-5 multiplier as if you play it with 1-3? The margin would be how much you win or loose by not whether you win or loose? It really only makes a difference when you are, for example sending very large units numbers out against very low unit numbers. Ie with a max 5 multiplier 25RP total could loose to 10RP total if you gain a 1,1,1,1,1 vs 5,5,5,5,5 [25vs50] which is tactically unlikely.
@ Scope, that was exactly what I was aiming for when I came up with the rules. Something as close to Risk as we could get.
Essentially it will really be discovered in the game how likely it will be to happen. Bearing in mind that Commanders will be limited to spending what they are given to spend as Officers will want to keep back some RP for themselves etc. Let me talk to JB again. I see no harm in starting at say 3 max or trying a run out with 5 and perhaps updating as the skirmishes go off.
#102
Posted 17 February 2009 - 13:45

#103
Posted 20 February 2009 - 06:48

#104
Posted 23 February 2009 - 13:39


#105
Posted 28 February 2009 - 02:18
All other assets are just about in place and we should kick off in a day or two.
Quote


#106
Posted 28 February 2009 - 05:36
Edited by DerKrieger, 28 February 2009 - 05:39.




#107
Posted 28 February 2009 - 06:40
Quote


#108
Posted 06 March 2009 - 15:29
I hope another General can be found. I will be watching the topic.
Greetings, and my apologies. Leaders of the RP are already informed.

#109
Posted 06 March 2009 - 15:37
On a serious note, I am sorry to see you go Aftershock, it would have been fun matching wits with you mate. Best of luck with the exams, hope you ace them all. Hopefully, whoever takes the role shall be a good challenge.
#110
Posted 09 March 2009 - 22:12

#111
Posted 09 March 2009 - 22:33
Quote


#114
Posted 10 March 2009 - 07:57
My sincere apologies to everyone for the horrible delays that this roleplay has encountered. It was never intended to have such a thorough re-working, but when we get underway I think everyone will agree that it's for the better. Don't lose faith now, soldiers!
Quote


#115
Posted 18 March 2009 - 14:31
#116
Posted 18 March 2009 - 15:26
#117
Posted 19 March 2009 - 00:17
We are literally this close to being able to go. With any luck we can have the assets in place by the time I wake up tomorrow.
Quote


#118
Posted 19 March 2009 - 00:30




#119
Posted 26 March 2009 - 23:03

#120
Posted 10 April 2009 - 12:11
I'm sorry, guys. I really am. RL went completely and utterly insane; I had about five different major assignments and an absence for a long weekend which totally threw me off track, so this sort of dropped off the face of the planet. As a result I'm aware we'll have lost people, so I'm re-launching the application process. If you've already applied, then so long as you reply by the end of the week saying you're still able, then you're guaranteed your slot. This is just so I know who is still okay to participate (remember, you can take your turn any time within your rank's 12-hour phase, so we shouldn't have any time zone issues; if you don't go, your turn will default to a ranking officer in the next/final phase). This is my sincere promise: when re-applications close at the end of the week, we'll be ready to go. There is so little left to do that you have my word it will be done by the time we have a full set of players. Get ready, folks; you'll be in the thick of it in one week's time, no more.
Edited by CommanderJB, 10 April 2009 - 12:14.
Quote


#121
Posted 10 April 2009 - 12:13

Just so you know...


#122
Posted 10 April 2009 - 12:21
Also note we are still missing a Russian Third Officer, so at least one new applicant is guaranteed a position as well.
Edited by CommanderJB, 10 April 2009 - 12:22.
Quote


#123
Posted 10 April 2009 - 12:42

#124
Posted 10 April 2009 - 17:34




4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users