

Generals II speculation/discussion
#176
Posted 31 July 2009 - 14:01
I hope my computer can handle that kind of game, because games nowadays requires a power computer and my computer is like Pentium III or like AMD Sempron 2400+ T_T
I can't wait to take a play on that game, so excited i can't wait to play it...

If revenge is called justice, then that justice breeds yet more revenge
#177
Posted 31 July 2009 - 14:10

kudos to Pasidon for this awesome avvy and siggy!
#178
Posted 31 July 2009 - 14:15
There's nothing we can do no matter how much they received many request about create command and conquer generals 2 first then C&C 4, well it is up to them. So let's just wait and see and besides there's some plenty of years or months to wait...
T_T

If revenge is called justice, then that justice breeds yet more revenge
#180
Posted 31 July 2009 - 14:23

kudos to Pasidon for this awesome avvy and siggy!
#181
Posted 31 July 2009 - 14:55
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 15:10, said:
Let's just hope they don't use RNA Engine if they plan to make Gens 2 someday, or else it sure will be different (and not mod-friendly...)
#182
Posted 31 July 2009 - 15:02

kudos to Pasidon for this awesome avvy and siggy!
#186
Posted 31 July 2009 - 22:35

kudos to Pasidon for this awesome avvy and siggy!
#187
#188
Posted 31 July 2009 - 22:42
Commander Carl, on 31 Jul 2009, 19:40, said:
And that one in my personal opinion wasn't that good...

kudos to Pasidon for this awesome avvy and siggy!
#189
#192
Posted 01 August 2009 - 18:52
Golan, on 31 Jul 2009, 21:38, said:
If Generals II were developed in RNA, what could we expect? C&C4 already is using and "updated" RNA [ http://gamesmodding....-design-updates ]. I don't think they'll create another engine for Generals II.
BTW C&C with pop cap limit, another EA Fail.
Edited by Gen.Kenobi, 01 August 2009 - 18:53.

kudos to Pasidon for this awesome avvy and siggy!
#193
Posted 01 August 2009 - 19:34
By the way it doesnt seem so bad because in a screenshot we see it being 600 which is upgradeable.

#195
Posted 05 August 2009 - 18:24
#196
Posted 06 August 2009 - 07:17
Rich19, on 9 Jul 2009, 13:11, said:
Oh, how I missed that, so true, although I think Kane is a fine character but still he is not cool enough for necromancing a million times, as it contains a bit of religious terms, it could be better if they do him Anti-Christ like, a dictator but people love him still since his charisma and wisdom.
GLA is just very cool side and it brings too much possibilities, instead of only seeing two country declaring war againist each other and you play to destroy that country, but GLA wants to destroy every other fuking country, which makes them so cool

#198
Posted 06 August 2009 - 10:18
su8perkillr, on 6 Aug 2009, 18:07, said:

Umm what...?
Indeed GLA is quite cool, just that they use junk that are too old to be called junk, they are more like antiques. GLA should get late cold war-era tecnology, I reckon, and add some terrorism and militants into it and you get a nice faction.
#199
Posted 06 August 2009 - 10:28
#200
Posted 06 August 2009 - 10:31
Turian, on 6 Aug 2009, 8:17, said:
Rich19, on 9 Jul 2009, 13:11, said:
Oh, how I missed that, so true, although I think Kane is a fine character but still he is not cool enough for necromancing a million times, as it contains a bit of religious terms, it could be better if they do him Anti-Christ like, a dictator but people love him still since his charisma and wisdom.
GLA is just very cool side and it brings too much possibilities, instead of only seeing two country declaring war againist each other and you play to destroy that country, but GLA wants to destroy every other fuking country, which makes them so cool

Just throwing this out here but Kane and Nod ARE Religious (sort of) Remember Cain, Seth and Lazarus (sp?) Infact Kane quotes a piece out of the Bible in C&C3.
Back on topic though, Junk weapons might be old but they can be improved/effective.

2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users