Generals II speculation/discussion
Gilgamesh
31 Jul 2009
WOW Command & Conquer Generals 2 eh?
I hope my computer can handle that kind of game, because games nowadays requires a power computer and my computer is like Pentium III or like AMD Sempron 2400+ T_T
I can't wait to take a play on that game, so excited i can't wait to play it...
I hope my computer can handle that kind of game, because games nowadays requires a power computer and my computer is like Pentium III or like AMD Sempron 2400+ T_T
I can't wait to take a play on that game, so excited i can't wait to play it...
Gen.Kenobi
31 Jul 2009
Unfortunatly i belive will take long time to EA create C&C Generals II. They are fu***ing with C&C 4 first...I personaly don't belive that with Generals II will be different.
Gilgamesh
31 Jul 2009
Oh men, i thought they going to make first command and conquer generals 2 but instead they make C&C 4 so be it that way.
There's nothing we can do no matter how much they received many request about create command and conquer generals 2 first then C&C 4, well it is up to them. So let's just wait and see and besides there's some plenty of years or months to wait...
T_T
There's nothing we can do no matter how much they received many request about create command and conquer generals 2 first then C&C 4, well it is up to them. So let's just wait and see and besides there's some plenty of years or months to wait...
T_T
Ion Cannon!
31 Jul 2009
The speculation was that the announced CNC4 game would instead be generals 2, but it wasn't so there won't be any announcement anytime soon.
CJ
31 Jul 2009
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 15:10, said:
Unfortunatly i belive will take long time to EA create C&C Generals II. They are fu***ing with C&C 4 first...I personaly don't belive that with Generals II will be different.
Let's just hope they don't use RNA Engine if they plan to make Gens 2 someday, or else it sure will be different (and not mod-friendly...)
Gen.Kenobi
31 Jul 2009
Well, for what i'm seeign, RNA is far more friendly tham Updated SAGE(C&C3)
Golan
31 Jul 2009
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 16:02, said:
Well, for what i'm seeign, RNA is far more friendly tham Updated SAGE(C&C3)
It's pretty much the same in terms of modability.
BeefJeRKy
31 Jul 2009
Golan, on 31 Jul 2009, 19:14, said:
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 16:02, said:
Well, for what i'm seeign, RNA is far more friendly tham Updated SAGE(C&C3)
It's pretty much the same in terms of modability.
Harder to learn but better results/more potential?
CJ
31 Jul 2009
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 23:35, said:
I guess so...much TC mods that i don't see since Generals ZH...
Indeed, the only one that succeeded is MidEast Crisis for C&C, all the others doesn't change the universe
Gen.Kenobi
31 Jul 2009
Commander Carl, on 31 Jul 2009, 19:40, said:
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 23:35, said:
I guess so...much TC mods that i don't see since Generals ZH...
Indeed, the only one that succeeded is MidEast Crisis for C&C, all the others doesn't change the universe
And that one in my personal opinion wasn't that good...
Golan
01 Aug 2009
Scope, on 31 Jul 2009, 22:33, said:
Golan, on 31 Jul 2009, 19:14, said:
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 16:02, said:
Well, for what i'm seeign, RNA is far more friendly tham Updated SAGE(C&C3)
It's pretty much the same in terms of modability.
Harder to learn but better results/more potential?
Uh, no? Both use pretty much the same SDK, the only difference is basically the modules of each game - while RA3 gained some more, it also lost some essential ones from CNC3.
Gen.Kenobi
01 Aug 2009
Golan, on 31 Jul 2009, 21:38, said:
Scope, on 31 Jul 2009, 22:33, said:
Golan, on 31 Jul 2009, 19:14, said:
Gen.Kenobi, on 31 Jul 2009, 16:02, said:
Well, for what i'm seeign, RNA is far more friendly tham Updated SAGE(C&C3)
It's pretty much the same in terms of modability.
Harder to learn but better results/more potential?
Uh, no? Both use pretty much the same SDK, the only difference is basically the modules of each game - while RA3 gained some more, it also lost some essential ones from CNC3.
If Generals II were developed in RNA, what could we expect? C&C4 already is using and "updated" RNA [ http://gamesmodding....-design-updates ]. I don't think they'll create another engine for Generals II.
BTW C&C with pop cap limit, another EA Fail.
Edited by Gen.Kenobi, 01 August 2009 - 18:53.
Kichō
01 Aug 2009
C&C always had a population cap, you just havent noticed it.
By the way it doesnt seem so bad because in a screenshot we see it being 600 which is upgradeable.
By the way it doesnt seem so bad because in a screenshot we see it being 600 which is upgradeable.
Su8perkillr
05 Aug 2009
it would be lol when, in a week/month or 2, generals 2 is released without any PR shit or any announcing screenshots or stuff, and that EA is developing it in a bunker, without internet, TV, telephone or radio, so nothing can leak. and then one day they walk out and tell here sir. we have the 5 million copys of generals 2 u asked us for.
General
06 Aug 2009
Rich19, on 9 Jul 2009, 13:11, said:
Am I the only one that finds the attitude of all the C&C media towards Kane really, really annoying? They keep on bullshitting with stuff like "Kane lives!" as if the man is a bloody religion. I don't give a toss that they have the same actor to do FMV sequences, I want to find out more about the damn game, and it would be better if I could do that without having role play crap rammed down my throat. It's a ridiculous character for a villain anyway - I'd much rather something more plausible like a general of a world superpower or renegade military group, rather than a bunch of religious terrorists who somehow have the power to take on the entire world's armies in open warfare.
Oh, how I missed that, so true, although I think Kane is a fine character but still he is not cool enough for necromancing a million times, as it contains a bit of religious terms, it could be better if they do him Anti-Christ like, a dictator but people love him still since his charisma and wisdom.
GLA is just very cool side and it brings too much possibilities, instead of only seeing two country declaring war againist each other and you play to destroy that country, but GLA wants to destroy every other fuking country, which makes them so cool
Su8perkillr
06 Aug 2009
true 
GLA is to cool! and then... on one day china and US are fighting somewhere in iran, and then... SCUDSTORM SPAM U STUPID AMERICANS! (o and ofcourse stupid chinese:P)
GLA is to cool! and then... on one day china and US are fighting somewhere in iran, and then... SCUDSTORM SPAM U STUPID AMERICANS! (o and ofcourse stupid chinese:P)
JJ
06 Aug 2009
su8perkillr, on 6 Aug 2009, 18:07, said:
true GLA is to cool! and then... on one day china and US are fighting somewhere in iran, and then... SCUDSTORM SPAM U STUPID AMERICANS! (o and ofcourse stupid chinese:P)
GLA is to cool! and then... on one day china and US are fighting somewhere in iran, and then... SCUDSTORM SPAM U STUPID AMERICANS! (o and ofcourse stupid chinese:P) Umm what...?
Indeed GLA is quite cool, just that they use junk that are too old to be called junk, they are more like antiques. GLA should get late cold war-era tecnology, I reckon, and add some terrorism and militants into it and you get a nice faction.
Wizard
06 Aug 2009
TBH I think it's interesting why EA have never dealt with GenII. It was a popular game and has a life much longer than most others. They are a business and businesses do not pass up opportunities to make money, which is something that GensII would most certainly do. There must be a reason for it having not been made already....
Kichō
06 Aug 2009
Turian, on 6 Aug 2009, 8:17, said:
Rich19, on 9 Jul 2009, 13:11, said:
Am I the only one that finds the attitude of all the C&C media towards Kane really, really annoying? They keep on bullshitting with stuff like "Kane lives!" as if the man is a bloody religion. I don't give a toss that they have the same actor to do FMV sequences, I want to find out more about the damn game, and it would be better if I could do that without having role play crap rammed down my throat. It's a ridiculous character for a villain anyway - I'd much rather something more plausible like a general of a world superpower or renegade military group, rather than a bunch of religious terrorists who somehow have the power to take on the entire world's armies in open warfare.
Oh, how I missed that, so true, although I think Kane is a fine character but still he is not cool enough for necromancing a million times, as it contains a bit of religious terms, it could be better if they do him Anti-Christ like, a dictator but people love him still since his charisma and wisdom.
GLA is just very cool side and it brings too much possibilities, instead of only seeing two country declaring war againist each other and you play to destroy that country, but GLA wants to destroy every other fuking country, which makes them so cool
Just throwing this out here but Kane and Nod ARE Religious (sort of) Remember Cain, Seth and Lazarus (sp?) Infact Kane quotes a piece out of the Bible in C&C3.
Back on topic though, Junk weapons might be old but they can be improved/effective.
